What does all this have to do with the hidden administrative share on the M:
drive?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura E. Hunter
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT:
You can get a list of all the servers and SG's and stores from my blog
post sample here:
http://blogs.brnets.com/michael/archive/2006/07/11/2518.aspx
Once you have that, search on homeMDB equal to the DN for each store and
count the number of results you get.
About a 5 minute job to add these
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
Hi everyone
Is there a way to use group policy to disable the CD rom, floppy and USB drives?
Thanks
Russ
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
HOWTO: Use Group Policy to disable USB, CD-ROM, Floppy Disk and
LS-120 drivers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555324
Ryan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Group, Russ
Sent: Friday, November
Actually since homeMDB is linked you can use homeMDBBL which is an attribute
of the msExchPrivateMDB objects[1]. There will be an entry for every
connected mailbox for that store. Certainly that is about the fastest way to
gather the info[2]. You should be able to dump the counts for even large
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir]event log monitoring.
document:
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
Depends on your exact requirements as the
standard settings arent too flexible youll probably find
out you need a 3rd party tool, such as :- http://www.gfi.com/endpointsecurity/
Rob
Robert Rutherford
QuoStar Solutions
Limited
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
Ahhh
I bow to your search foo.
Thank you very much!
Russ
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
ConradSent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:40 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
Sorry if I sound ignorant, will this work in a Windows 2000
environment?
ThanksRuss
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
ConradSent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:40 AMTo:
I certainly support joes second solution: dont
delegate this. As with some other suggestions described in the Delegation
Guide (which overall is very useful), you shouldnt implement every role
just because you can.
Your AD infrastructure will not be in any danger if the Schema FSMO
Nope, there weren't any updates on hypervisor during WinConnections - at least
none I heard of. So this info is actually quite useful. Did they actually demo
it at VMworld? Or just talk about it?
Thanks Mark for sharing.
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XP sp2 is when that GP was put in there. The xp sp2 policy only
controls Microsoft drivers.
Group, Russ wrote:
Sorry if I sound ignorant, will this work in a Windows 2000 environment?
Thanks
Russ
*From:* [EMAIL
Title: Restrict CD rom, floppy and USB via group policy?
If you read the article, at the bottom it states
that it applies to Win 2003. I'd have to infer that the policy settings are not
present for 2000.
- Original Message -
From:
Group, Russ
To:
I
highly doubt that any MS employee takes offence at what is surely as tongue in
cheek _expression_.
Let's not get _too_ PC please :/
neil
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Laura A.
RobinsonSent: Thursday, November 09, 2006
Hi
Several months ago, I upgraded a small, multi-site domain from
W2k to W2k3. Or so I thought. The various markings in the schema indicate that
the upgrade was successful. But when I run, for example, gpresult, it reports a
Windows 2000 domain. Is this just some flag or string that
What does it say under: AD Users Computers | [right click domain
name] | Raise Domain Functional Level...
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:12 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject:
It was demo'd (or should I say in was installed and running with a few tasks
constantly repeated to show it off) and looks - just like Windows on Windows!
and very seemless - no splash screens or the like.
They were showing off the whole suite Softgrid and VSR2SP1 and something else
too.
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir]event log monitoring.
document:
I'm currently getting the following error on my domain
controller. I'm receiving this on a server that runs, DC; DNS; DHCP
services
(it's showing onEventViewer\application every 5 minutes, after
trying to refresh a GPO)
++ Event Type:
Return Receipt
Your [ActiveDir] GPO Error on Domain Controller
document:
Return Receipt
Your [ActiveDir] GPO Error on Domain Controller
document:
I noticed the same thing yesterday with gpresult in 2 different forests
and I can assure you they are both at 2003 FFL, I wrote it off to a bug
in gpresult.
Also noticed the same thing with netdiag- duh- how can 2K server have a
build number from 2K3?
Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C)
Good question. DFL = 2003 and FFL = 2003. So it must just be some lingering
text string. Does anyone think there is more it?
Thanks.
-- nme
-Original Message-
From: Clingaman, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:39 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Return Receipt
Your [ActiveDir] GPO Error on Domain Controller
document
:
Return Receipt
Your [ActiveDir] GPO Error on Domain Controller
document:
Ah - now I see - that must be their back-door to access every system Windows is
running on ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:36 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
The problem is not that the WMI script
does not work, it is that I can not even CREATE one from my desktop. When I
right click on the WMI Filters section in GPMC and click on NEW or IMPORT I get
a Generic Failure message box and that is it
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
I just tried to deploy the package by
assigning it to a user who is an administrator of the test workstation and it
deployed fine. However, this is undesirable since the users of the domain are
not given administrative privileges on their workstations.
I believe that when assigning it
Here is my SMTPDiag results attached.
And these are results from other end domain
I just received.
220-tx-node2.otherdomain.com ESMTP
220 You've connected to Ironport 02 via mailhost.otherdomain.com from the
hostname: da
l1mspmx02.otherdomain.domain.corp, IP address of:
Hi -
I am trying to sort out a long-standing replication mess.
The configuration is three sites (W2k3 FL as per earlier email) connected over
T1 lines in series (A-B-C). The layout is:
Site A:
- DCA1 (bridgehead)
- DCA2
Site B:
- DCB1 (self for DNS)
- DCB2 (bridgehead; DCA1
That indicates that something is preventing Admi. Template policy from running.
Posting the relevants part of userenv.log would be helpful.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: Paul G. DaSilva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 11/10/2006 10:43 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir]
You
may doubt it, but I don't. It's a moniker that implies (aside from childishness
on the part of the person who uses it) that Microsoft is a company that is all
about corporate greed. That's an unfair characterization and IMO, is insulting
to the 75%+ of Microsoft employees who spend a
That's the secret share we use for the man. It's where we keep the
collective intelligence that allows us to represent our single self as
multiple entities.
Laura
I am Dsylexia of Borg. Your a$$ will be laminated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's friday, can't we all just get along?
-- Original message -- From: "Laura A. Robinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You may doubt it, but I don't. It's a moniker that implies (aside from childishness on the part of the person who uses it) that Microsoft is a company that is
Whats repadmin.exe
/showrepl * show? Quite possibly the site B DCs will need to be
forcibly demoted based on your description.
- Roger
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 2:40 PM
To:
Its a firewall issue alright - lol -
theirs! They are using an appliance called IronPort and because you don't
have the required, in this case by the IronPort appliance, a PTR record
its not putting you into the allowed relay list. They may also require
ICMP (ping) to accept mail first. Some
Thanks, Roger. When I sent the original
message, I had just run /showreps and gotten complaints on DCB1 that it could
not find DCB2. However, when I run /showrepl *, everything comes up clean. (BTW:
the use of * just made my life a lot simpler thanks.) I am going to brush up
on the force
I cant say what could
be happening without seeing lots more data. Just because repadmin.exe
/showrepl shows no apparent errors doesnt definitively mean there arent
any. Its conceivable the DC(s) failing to replicate has no inbound
and/or outbound replication partners in which case
There's no anger or distress on my end (and I doubt there's any on
anybody else's part, either). I'm simply pointing out that yes, there are
Microsoft employees who don't find the slur amusing. No emotional investment, I
assure you. :-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go to dyndns.com. They'll set up a PTR for you
immediately and cheaply.
Provided you own your domain, that is.
- Original Message -
From:
Technical Support
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:47
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
40 matches
Mail list logo
