Good
morning,
Can anybody explain
the purpose of the site folder server in an Exchange 2003 native mode
organization. The reason I am asking is becauseI recently ran the Exchange
Best Practices Analyzer and the only critical issue it found was the Admin Group
Site Folder Server deleted. My
elsewhere and the updates didn't occur
correctly. Where's the server that's missing and what were you planning to
do to correct the issue?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Rittenhouse, Cindy (Police)Sent: Tue 8/23/2005 9:21
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir]
OT-Exchange
e replicas in place.
Al
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Rittenhouse, Cindy (Police)Sent: Tue 8/23/2005 10:51
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server
During the Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003 migration, all
public folders and system fo
Our agency recently
adopted a new security policy that required changes to thedefault domain
policy security settings, specifically the password policy and account lockout
policy. I have change the policy several times, but it keeps reverting back to
the previous policy. We have 4 DCs,
Hi,
I have a permissions issue. We recently moved a Novell 5.1 server to a
Windows 2000 server in a Windows 2000 AD. We backed up the files from the
NetWare server to tape (Backup Exec) and restored to the W2K server. We gave
a user full control to a folder, there are no deny permissions set. When
permissions
Have you tried to reset the permissions on the files in that folder?
Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Jeff,
If you are sure you don't want to go the DNS route (which would be my first
choice), we have done this by creating the host file, placing it in the
sysvol\domain\scripts folder, creating a .bat file in the scripts folder to
copy \\dcxx\sysvol\yourdomain\scripts\hosts
A consultant at a remote site attempted to DCPROMO a W2K server with the
authoritative domain DNS server listed as secondary and an external ISP DNS
server as primary. I am amazed that Active Directory actually installed,
even in the correct site, but now he can't logon to the server. In
site BTw.
Jef
Original Message:
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] cleanup AD connections after move server to different
site
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:50:01 -0500
A computer consultant in a remote dept decided to promote his member server
to a DC
A computer consultant in a remote dept decided to promote his member server
to a DC without telling anyone in advance. Since the dept was part of the
default first site, that is where the DC was placed. Not good. Users started
authenticating across the WAN. I created a site for that dept, linked
.
Rename the .txt extension to .zip
Regards,
Dennis Schut
Technical Consultant
MCP, MCSE, MCSA2K 2K3, MCSAS MCSES, MCSE2K MCSE2K3
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] sysvol not replicating
I read
the article, but there is currently 1.87 GB of free space on volume C, the
pagefile is located on volume D. I just got Sonar installed and running. Maybe
it will shed a brighter light on the problem. I've been up to my eyeballs in FRS
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 7:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] sysvol not replicating
Yes, the GUID._MSDCS.domain name is present in the Lancco.root zone. The
Replica Set Parent is PSDC1
,
we did it once to the PDC for each of our domains to get the users and
groups and then we quickly promoed a pure W2K machine and moved the
fsmo's and wiped out the upgraded machine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Title: Message
Joe,
I got terminal services installed, also the support
tools and the resource kit. As for the travel, Orlando in Nov. for an Exchange
conference will be nice, if I survive FRS.I'm beginning to think a
demotion and reformat my be the final outcome.
[Rittenhouse,
Cindy
the topology to correct itself.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] sysvol not replicating
results from repadmin look fine, server
Cindy,
Is this DC in the same site as your FSMO holders?
BR,
Rob
Robert Rutherford
+44 (0)1305 208232
+44 (0)7970 122362
Rittenhouse, Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ster.pa.us
with it's partners.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 7:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
results from repadmin look fine, server is running SP4
C:\Documents and Settings
. If the
FRS problem can't be resolved, dcpromo back to a member server, double
check
DNS settings and then attempt the promotion again.
Simon Geary
MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: 29 August 2003 16:33
Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] sysvol not replicating
Two days ago a consulting firm upgraded a BDC at a remote location to
Windows 2000. After the upgrade users had all types of trouble
connecting. It seems the sysvol
Two days ago a consulting firm upgraded a BDC at a remote location to
Windows 2000. After the upgrade users had all types of trouble connecting.
It seems the sysvol is not replicating because the
Do_Not_Remove_NtFrs_PreInstall_Directory, Policies directory, and Scripts
directory do not exist on
(0)7970 122362
Rittenhouse, Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ster.pa.us cc:
Sent by:Subject: [ActiveDir]
sysvol not replicating
Script
R/Bill
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] sysvol not replicating
results from dcdiag
Domain Controller Diagnosis
Performing initial
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse, Cindy
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Anonymous Logon
I successfully upgraded my NT domain to AD yesterday. I now find my DC
security log on the PDC
: Re: [ActiveDir] Anonymous Logon
If web services or ftp are running on those, both those services allow anon
to access the main page,
- Original Message -
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
.
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse,
Cindy
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 PM
!
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rittenhouse, Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:03 PM
To: '[EMAIL
I successfully upgraded my NT domain to AD yesterday. I now find my DC
security log on the PDC emulator filling up twice a day. It is set to 2048
KB, do not overwrite (I have to save them for 3 years). The majority of
events are Anonymous logons. Is it normal to have this quantity of Anonymous
Information Services
310 604-2030
310 604-2022 fax
www.belkin.com
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade
I finally have a date set for my AD upgrade
I finally have a date set for my AD upgrade. It will be in in place upgrade
of our NT domain. I've done this procedure 3 times in my test lab and I'm
95% confident. What I don't know is what impact the upgrade process will
have on our end users accessing network resources during the upgrade
Please help. I have 3 servers, in 2 different domains that keep showing up
in DNS with both their correct ip address and an entry with ip address
192.168.234.235. I keep deleting these entries, but they keep reappearing.
There must be some significance to this ip address. Does anyone have an idea
, can you
ping the number?
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
Please help. I have 3 servers, in 2 different domains that keep showing
up in DNS with both
in the article solves
the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
No, I can not ping it and nbtstat results host not found.
-Original Message
fix available from Microsoft. The article is Q292822.
Downloading the fix and implementing the steps in the article solves
the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
In our organization, our internal DNS server does not maintain reverse
lookup zones. It has always been that way and since we have never had any
issues, my manager see no need to change. We are preparing to upgrade our NT
domain to AD. Are there any specific reason requiring reverse lookup zones
This may be a little simplistic and naive, but if you didn't maintain
reverse lookup zones, the problem would be eliminated. What would the
repercussions be to maintaining only forward lookup zones on a internally
used DNS?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
Exchange Server 5.5.
Good luck and have fun!
LCD
-Original Message- From: Rittenhouse,
Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wed
6/5/2002 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:
Subject: [ActiveDir] Forest Prep and ADC
I am wor
home and rest while replication is going on...
6. Run Exchange 2000 setup.
When using the guide, use the section dedicated to Integrating with
Exchange Server 5.5.
Good luck and have fun!
LCD
-Original Message- From: Rittenhouse,
Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] setting up DNS
We don't want to use our ISP's DNS servers because they are unreliable and
we have had problems with them in the past. Why can't my
on the client you are using for testing (this might be the server
itself) and type ipconfig /flushdns. Try resolving again.
HTH,
Linton
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:12 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] setting up DNS
You may be onto something here, I noticed that the Cache listing on my old
NT DNS server contains many more entries than the new 2000
I am trying to setup a Windows 2000 DNS server to prepare for active
directory. We are still an NT4.0 domain. I followed the guidelines in
Q300202 How to Configure DNS for Internet Access. I created a forward lookup
zone for what will be our active directory domain (an internal domain name).
It
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] setting up DNS
You need to enable that and then add your ISP's DNS servers to the field.
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
My question is a little basic for this site, but I am hoping all your
expertise will help me design the most efficient active directory structure.
I currently have 2 NT domains, one for county government, the other for
county police agencies. We plan to create a single forest with 3 trees; an
44 matches
Mail list logo
