32 and 64-bit DCs don't have a problem being in the same environment. Is your schema up to date with the latest revisions (R2 I believe)?
hardware to throw at it.
Can 32 and 64 bit ADs comingle?
Thanks!
Josh
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:44:46 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.DIT Size> > > Someone said this:> > Whatever needs to be loaded should
3132
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
> Guido
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:53 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.DIT Size
>
>
>
> 1.7GB for 250.000 users is pretty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
Guido
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:53 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.DIT Size
1.7GB for 250.000 users is pretty small
AD (unless
you're replacing old server HW with new HW at the same
time...).
/Guido
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-WeidnerSent: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 23:47To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.DIT
Size
Hello
Joshu
;>
Weblog: http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joshua Coffman
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:59 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] NTDS.DIT Size
Our
Our AD (NTDS.dit) is at 1.7GB (approx. 250,000 users).
Should an offline defrag be performed at a regular interval?
Some articles I read only say it is only worthwhile if you are running low on space. We have plenty of drive space and RAM.
At what point should the AD be moved to 64 bit?
T
yep, that's what I meant - but I was too lazy to add these details ;-)
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Freitag, 15. April 2005 17:56
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:02 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Just to clarify, it is the parts that change and are tagged to replicate
that replicate. You could
, 2005 11:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Trick question? The parts of the 100gb that will replicate are the parts
that change. (not counting dcpromo of new boxes) How much is changing? Who
knows. Different for everyone.
~Eric
-Original Message
eally state it,
so I wanted to clarify.
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos
Magalhaes
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:23 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Well Francis,
How is your DNS ser
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 2:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Eric,
Granted but how much of that actual 100gb will be replicated over that
64k line? I can see the issue if you do a DC promo on a W2k3 server on
the other size and it's the first bo
itions" this will
create two APP partitions:
1. ForestDNS
2. DomainDNS
HTH
Carlos Magalhaes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Ouellet
Sent: 15 April 2005 02:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
It's also worth to point out, that you have to distinguish heavily
between the OS version and the DIT size to expect. Other cleanup tasks
can also strongly impact DIT size.
At HP our Win2000 GCs had an average DIT size of 18GB - we then disable
riday, April 15, 2005 4:00 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
It's also worth to point out, that you have to distinguish heavily between
the OS version and the DIT size to expect. Other cleanup tasks can also
strongly impact DIT size.
At HP our Win200
Braggert. ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Well I've seen very very large in test on many occasions
x27;
That said it is also environment dependant :P
Carlos Magalhaes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: 15 April 2005 06:00 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Oops, I typo
s impact is not as dramatic (will mostly impact DIT on those DCs
which aren't DNS servers...)
/Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: Freitag, 15. April 2005 05:43
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveD
case.
:)
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fleischman
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:56 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
It's hard to characterize how "much" connectivity you need vs. how big
your db is. A huge db of
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:43 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
Eric/Joe,
Thanks for the great input! My test lab is VM ware running on 20
GB TB SAN that you can use
ECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:58 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
>
> See I almost cc'ed you on the response to get your input on this too as
> I
> knew you had played wi
n I have nearby. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
See I almost cc'ed you on the response to get your input on this too as
I
D] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:35 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
I've seen larger.
I've seen 15GB+ on MANY occasions, 30GB+ on quite a few occasions, and
100GB+ on a few occasions.
~Eric
-Original
ivedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
The largest production DIT I have personally seen was on the order of
8GB
for the GC DIT for a Fortune 5 company running about 250k users of which
about 180k were Exchange enabled. Also had some 250k contacts, 200k or
so
computer objects, 100k or so gro
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:53 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] NTDS.dit size
I know that AD can have millions of objects, just trying to see what the
real world size
I know that AD can have millions of objects, just trying to see what
the real world size of some your AD databases are. Do any of you have
databases greater than 20GB+... or more?
Thanks
Mike
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
26 matches
Mail list logo
