Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADAM-ADSIEDIT and adam-user-based
administration.. (ADAM SP1)
Thanks for the tip...
It's much more user-friendly than ldp (thatÂ’s not saying much, I know :)
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Ansar Mohammed
Enviado el
(I'm interested in
using ADAM to store security-related data, so
I'd love to be able to have a
securuty admin that is not an AD admin, but I digress)..
Someone doesn't need to be an AD Admin to admin ADAM. They can be a normal
user in either AD or on local machines. Though local machine IDs
: October 24, 2006 3:28 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADAM-ADSIEDIT and adam-user-based
administration.. (ADAM SP1)
Until Longhorn, ADAM-ADSIEdit will not support simple binds, sorry. LDP
is your only option.
Second -- you cannot protect *anything* on a joined
] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitri Gavrilov
Sent: October 24, 2006 3:28 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADAM-ADSIEDIT and adam-user-based
administration.. (ADAM SP1)
Until Longhorn, ADAM-ADSIEdit will not support simple binds, sorry. LDP
Until Longhorn, ADAM-ADSIEdit will not support simple binds, sorry. LDP
is your only option.
Second -- you cannot protect *anything* on a joined machine from an AD
admin. If you don't trust them, leave the domain. That's the only way.
For example, a builtin admin on the machine can bind to ADAM
