e
to beef up the box to handle the load that would normally be distributed
across multiple boxes, but it's something you can do today.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: David Adner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Act
tp://www.joeware.net (download joeware)
http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet (wear joeware)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DEC Chatter
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DEC Chatter - Was something else...
1. I don't think so... Not if it were a TRUE caching mechanism... I.E.
You don't drag all of the account info for all objects in a single
domain to the caching device, yo
ol?
-
http://www.joeware.net (download joeware)
http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet (wear joeware)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DE
TECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard,
AricSent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:44 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DEC Chatter -
Was something else...
Seems that there was a
little talk about Longhorn. Was anything said about an interim version of
Windows before Longhorn? i.e. Windows
Seems that there was a little talk about
Longhorn. Was anything said about an interim version of Windows before
Longhorn? i.e. Windows 2005..6..7…
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004
6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
> 1. Caching Domain Controllers - basically a DC that did
> 2. Multiple domain hosting from a single DC.
In combination, these would definitely be nice for larger environments that
have multiple Domain's with cutting down on hardware costs. Although I
suppose individual DC's would need to be a b
