Re: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-11-11 Thread Roger Seielstad
I'd think a single domain forest is plenty for an extranet solution. My current employer runs an extranet (so to speak) of over 1 machines in a single domain environment. Roger On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 08:57:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are looking at redesigning our extranet

RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-10-26 Thread Justin_Leney
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's document

RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-10-25 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
. Less infrastructure requirements. Remember to patch, patch, patch. Good Luck. Todd From: Grillenmeier, Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's yep, done it several times this way

RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-10-25 Thread Renouf, Phil
TS that gives a user a full desktop. Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's Here are some sources to reference in your

RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-10-25 Thread Rodney Gardiner
and giving them only access to the application required. Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Renouf, Phil Sent: Tuesday, 26 October 2004 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's Good points, although for giving

RE: [ActiveDir] Extranet's

2004-10-24 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
Title: [ActiveDir] Trusting Domain SIDs yep, done it several times this way - at least for the users. Depending on how your machines need to talk to the internal servers, you might not even need to setup a trust. But if you don't get around it, you could still limit it's reach using