RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-22 Thread George Arezina
we allow and cache web pages. George From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yann Kristofic Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 14:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback Standard Edition. Does not allow array configurations

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-20 Thread Marcus.Oh
SE? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 12:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback That might be true for 2000 and 2004 SE. ;-) -rtk From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-20 Thread Yann Kristofic
Standard Edition. Does not allow array configurations... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Fri 8/20/2004 14:55To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback SE? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Robert Rutherford
:O) It depends what you are using for I guess? I take it that you are using it for caching only? If this is the case then its fine to install it on your main production network and will make your life easier too, i.e. user auth, etc. Rob From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Yann Kristofic
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rutherford Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 18:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback :O) It depends what you are using for I guess? I take it that you are using it for caching only? If this is the case then its

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Cotter, Paul M.
I'll only speak WRT ISA 2004, since that's what I'm using right now. We havea similar config to the one you describe, with ISA sitting in a DMZ isolated between PIX firewalls. I would think that a major con with having it part of your production AD domain is that you would have to open a

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Rick Kingslan
I'm not a big fan of DMZ firewalls being a member of the domain. Tome, it's counter-intuitive. We, too, have a two-layer DMZ (Public, Private, then Internal) and I would advocate an ISA on the internal being your'traffic goes this way' gateway system, if you will. This system would be a

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Marcus.Oh
you're going to run into a problem with a stand-alone ISAserver if you intend to build it in an array configuration of some sort. for an array, ideally, the ISA servers would be in their own domain. if it's stand-alone, simplify ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback

2004-08-19 Thread Rick Kingslan
That might be true for 2000 and 2004 SE. ;-) -rtk _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ISA Feedback you're going to run into a problem