an NT4 machine as I have not really dug into it.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky
HabeebSent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:33 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm
a behavior in AD Sites as it pertains to authenti cation
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to
confirm a behavior in AD Sites as it pertains to authenti
cation.
A few things Joe didn’t mention that I
bet are very related or that I’d slightly
correct:
0) Once a domain is upgraded from NT4 to
Windows 200X (0 or 3
Eric
FleischmanSent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:52 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm
a behavior in AD Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
A few things Joe didn’t mention that I bet
are very related or that I’d slightly correct:
0) Once a domain is upgraded from NT4
documented in KB,
somewhere.
~Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to
confirm a behavior in AD Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
I see it
ve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CIT)
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LIKELY ADV: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm a behavior in
AD Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
Do you know of a w
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LIKELY ADV: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm a behavior in AD
Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
If the DC
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LIKELY ADV: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm a behavior in AD
Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
If the DC locator process used the site link
ymaids.com - we know ITwww.akomolafe.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Darren Mar-EliaSent: Fri 5/7/2004 7:12 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Need to confirm a behavior in AD Sites as it pertains to authenti cation.
T
Todd-Not sure if this will get to your specific issue
here, but Gil wrote a great article about the DC discovery process on Windows
& .Net magazine here: http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/37935/37935.html
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
If the DC locator process used the site link costs it would actually make things
easier, but it doesn't, it uses the DC's SRV record in DNS.
Depending on your subnet that you have defined in Sites & Services, the DC's record
will be added into a site specific SRV record and also a domain wide S
10 matches
Mail list logo
