Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server 2005
Hi Glenn:
I have been building a configuration similar to what you recommend, but using RRAS (I don't own ISA).
I have RRAS running on the physical host. This has two physical NICs (ipconfig at the end of this post): ProductionLAN and TestLAN
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server 2005
The answer is that you should have nothing
entered in the default gateway field for the internal (TestLAN) interface. Traffic
is flowing now.
Sorry to waste the bandwidth.
-- nme
From: Noah
Eiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server 2005
Thanks.
From your descriptions, I think I would want to use NAT only on the NIC
connected to the production network. That is, have all of the traffic from
the virtual network appearing as a single address on the production network.
Since
configuration should
not negatively impact anything
HTH
Aric Bernard
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004
9:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Virtual Server 2005
Thanks, Glenn
Thanks.
From your descriptions, I think I would want to use NAT only on the NIC
connected to the production network. That is, have all of the traffic
from the virtual network appearing as a single address on the
production network.
Since I want everything on the test network (virtual and
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Your Name
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server 2005
Thanks.
From your descriptions, I think I would want to use NAT only on the NIC
connected to the production network. That is, have all
ry to each VS to speed up performance, but hey, money can
fix that *grin*.
Glenn
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Saturday, 20 November 2004 5:27 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual
Server 2005
Ok. Lets just say that
Hi Noah,
I prefer the sysprep/copy method; although using the differencing disks option
is attractive.
The oringinal system I'm going to SYSPREP is always mutli-homed. The first NIC
I put into Host Only mode so it talk to other Hosts on my system. The second
NIC I NAT/Bridge to the external
Desmond[EMAIL PROTECTED]Payton on the web!
www.wpcp.orgv - 773.534.0034 x135f -
773.534.8101
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Fri
11/19/2004 3:16 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual
Server 2005
I don't use sysprep. I just use newsid from sysinternals. T
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server
2005
Thanks all. I will play
around with the various methods of duplicating servers (Al, I assume by PXE you
mean in combination with RIS? Do you use a virtual RIS
server?)
As for the networking
portion, I find that when I add
An internal virtual network
can be configured to allow all Virtual hosts to communicate together without
interacting with other physical hosts on the VS2005 servers real
network.
VMs can be connected to the real network
of the VS2005 server allowing them to interact with all hosts on the
Networking outside the box is usually done by adding the
virtual host to the phys host network card. The phys NIC acts as a router
in this case and everything is NAT'd off to the external
network.
That's the same for letting the hosted OS access anything
off the host server whether internet
RIS is just one way of doing it. Any PXE system could
be used I would imagine ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:21 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual
Server 2005
Thanks all. I will play
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Virtual Server 2005
Thanks all. I will play around with the
various methods of duplicating servers (Al, I assume by PXE you mean in combination
with RIS? Do you use a virtual RIS server?)
As for the networking portion, I find that
when I add a virtual host
! www.wpcp.orgv - 773.534.0034 x135f - 773.534.8101
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Fri 11/19/2004 3:16 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Virtual Server 2005
I don't use sysprep. I just use newsid from sysinternals. Then I edit the
.vmc to reflect the new VS name/location. I'm that lazy
Ok. Lets just say that was
scary-easy (i.e., deploying new machines). Thanks! Wow, if only real life could
run in RAM.
Someone asked me to describe generally
what I was looking to do. I want to setup a test environment that contains:
2 DCs
1 Exchange box
1 database server
1+ XP Pro
16 matches
Mail list logo
