.
[1] Yeah - so what if it hasn't been supported in years?
-Original Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Agreed. As Linux tries to become more and more
: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
That's long since happened, my friend.
The particular distro I was installing was Redhat 7.1[1], which is required
for one of our soon to be legacy products...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE
10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Of course that does tend to be distribution specific ;)
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 09:40, Roger Seielstad wrote:
Actually, close.
Apparently, a base install of Linux doesn't include things like
ping, traceroute
Class
Driver error. Recompile kernel snicker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Roger Seielstad
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
.
-Original Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Driver error. Recompile kernel snicker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
joe...
Heh. Yeah right.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Or Universal Groups!
Apparently
Driver error. Recompile kernel snicker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Um, yeah. That's right.
If I
Sent: 21 April 2004 02:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Using pure ldap logic, One would assume that is the case. I guess I
was hoping someone had stumbled across a kb article so that once this
is done in production, I have an endorsed
-Original Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
We aren't even considering converting or making our 200k+ user objects
inetorgperson objects. We have had no requirement
, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
GO JOE !!
Jerry Welch
CPS Systems
US/Canada: 888-666-0277
International: +1 703 827 0919 (-5 GMT)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of joe
Sent
And you didn't even mention the E word! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
We aren't even considering converting
to InetOrgPerson Class
And you didn't even mention the E word! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
We aren't even
, April 22, 2004 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Please - we're trying to not encourage him... ;)
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc
, April 22, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
And you didn't even mention the E word! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL
Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Roger, you are just mad because you were typing up the same
note and I typed
it and sent it out faster...
Oh well I have
Hello Brent,
this is very easy to accomblish: you just need to add the inetOrgPerson
class to the objectClass attribute of the user using adsiedit or a script.
Ulf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Westmoreland
Sent: Dienstag, 20.
Using pure ldap logic, One would assume that is the case. I guess I
was hoping someone had stumbled across a kb article so that once this
is done in production, I have an endorsed Microsoft methodology to take
to management.
On Apr 21, 2004, at 8:12 AM, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner wrote:
Hello
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent
Westmoreland
Sent: 21 April 2004 02:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Using pure ldap logic, One would assume that is the case. I guess I
was hoping someone had stumbled across a kb article so that once
inetorgPerson
better than the user class.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent
Westmoreland
Sent: 21 April 2004 02:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Using pure ldap logic, One would assume
2004 02:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
Using pure ldap logic, One would assume that is the case. I guess I
was hoping someone had stumbled across a kb article so that once this
is done in production, I have an endorsed Microsoft methodology
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 4/21/2004 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User to InetOrgPerson Class
This thread has gotten my interest. We had IBM in here a couple of years ago talking
about their LDAP and that Active Directory was inferior because of it's implementation
21 matches
Mail list logo
