RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server?

2004-03-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
: RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server? In our environment (60+ sites, 130 DCs, 25k+ users) I've not yet chosen a bridegehead, and am successful at controlling where my replication takes place by carefully choosing through AD Sites and Services the site that a specific set of servers

RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server?

2004-03-06 Thread Rick Kingslan
/willhack4food -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M. Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server? Hi Rick, Thanks for the reply! Unless the KCC

RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server?

2004-03-05 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server? My take on it has always been unless the Knowledge Consistency Checker can't figure it out, don't set a Bridgehead - this is going to prevent the KCC from

RE: [ActiveDir] recommendation for bridgehead server?

2004-03-04 Thread Rick Kingslan
My take on it has always been unless the Knowledge Consistency Checker can't figure it out, don't set a Bridgehead - this is going to prevent the KCC from doing some good things for you. Along the lines of creating new links and reassigning the Bridgehead in the event of the preferred