]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Yes Exchange is a resource hog. If I run Exchange (virtualized) on it
own set of hardware? This should provide sufficient
resources (assuming
you have high quality hardware) and also give you
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 5:29 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I could not have worded that better
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy HARTONO
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
What about virtualizing DCs - say ESX farm with DCs - whats the downside and
things to watch
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy HARTONO
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
What about virtualizing DCs - say ESX farm with DCs - whats the downside and
things to watch out
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware [okay so
now we're REALLY OT]
So Sorry one more really OT but since it's Exchange hopefully you will
indulge me? Yeah and I suck at lurking I know
The Pop connector also does not drop the email into the Exchange in a place
)
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Hi Tony,
I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can
just virtualize any application because of all the marketing
hype. Be very careful, I/O is critical to Exchange and any
other database application which
-0800Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Perhaps some day I'll have time to run JetStress on an clustered Exchange
server on ESX attached to a SAN to see how it performs.
Which is a good thing to do before concluding that virtualizing exchange is a
"no-no&
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Of course it's always best, but I have to wonder what
It may make sense for smaller environments -I'm usually dealing with
the 1000 user-plus environments on most occasions. In everything testing
is key.
Thanks for the good points,
Chuck Gafford
Systems Architect
Unisys
, October 31, 2005 1:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
From a book proposal I wrote:
According to the United States Small Business Administration (the US SBA, at
http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/arsbfaq.txt), small firms:
* Total
A new FAQ was published on this topic yesterday:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/10/31/413382.aspx
I love the wording in this one.
***
Q: Do we support Exchange on other virtualization platforms?
A: Microsoft has a general support policy for running Microsoft software
in
, 2005 4:44 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
A new FAQ was published on this topic yesterday:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/10/31/413382.aspx
I love the wording in this one.
***
Q: Do we support Exchange on other
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Of course it's always best, but I have to wonder what
- SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:29 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I would just like to point out that the person who has SBS Rocks as part of
her email address did not post that
I was thinking
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I would just like to point out that the person who has SBS Rocks as part of
her email address did not post that
I was thinking that though. :-)
Ed Crowley [MVP] wrote:
Less than 50 means SBS, doesn't it? Who needs
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I would just like to point out that the person who has SBS Rocks as part of
her email address did not post that
I was thinking that though. :-)
Ed Crowley [MVP] wrote:
Less
: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware [okay so
now we're getting a bit OT]
Susan, SMTP isn't a client retrieval protocol (like POP), it's a mail
delivery protocol. IMAP, POP, and MAPI are your client retrieval
protocols. SMTP and (IIRC) MAPI are mail delivery protocols. MAPI doing
double
: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
From a book proposal I wrote:
According to the United States Small Business Administration (the US
SBA, at http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/arsbfaq.txt), small firms:
* Total approximately 23 million in the United States
- 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:39 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware [okay so
now we're getting a bit
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I would just like to point out that the person who has SBS Rocks as
part of
her email address did not post that
I was thinking that though. :-)
Ed Crowley [MVP] wrote:
Less than 50 means SBS, doesn't it? Who
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I disagree. Exchange on ESX can work out quite well in
certain situations...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL
of Presley, Steven
Sent: Sun 10/30/2005 8:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
We are quite a large ESX shop (number of guest OS's are in the 1000's I
believe) and while I fought it for quite some time we have ended up
using ESX for our
being offered for this type of setup.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 12:25 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
]
phone: (+65) 6330-9740 - temp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Presley, Steven
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:18 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Oh I agree...I'd
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I could not have worded that better.
Sincerely,
Jose Medeiros
ADP | National Account Services
ProBusiness Division | Information Services
925.737.7967
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 10/29/2005 5:40 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
It's possible on ESX but I'm still inclined to recommend not virtualizing
Exchange. I
PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:39:35 -0700Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Hi Tony,
I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can just virtualize any
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:53
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I couldn't agree more with Tony -- Exchange is a re
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coleman,
HunterSent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:35 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now
supported on virtual hardware
"It depends..."
We're running some production Exchange front-end serve
What's your sizing of mail stores and mailboxes there --
Chuck
-Original Message-From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSent: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:35:27 -0600Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
"It depends...&qu
Typically 20GB and 800 users per store, with 3 stores per
server.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 10:17
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Good thought on the consolidation scenario -- I can see a few more places
where it might be helpful.
Chuck
PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:53 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I couldn't agree more with Tony -- Exchange is a resource hog and should
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
I could not have worded that better.
Sincerely,
Jose Medeiros
ADP | National Account Services
ProBusiness Division | Information Services
925.737.7967 | 408-449-6621
Of Tony Murray
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Microsoft has introduced support for Exchange 2003 SP2 and later on Virtual
Server 2005 R2. This article has just been released.
http
, October 27, 2005 6:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Hi Tony,
I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can just virtualize
any application because of all
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Microsoft has introduced support for Exchange 2003 SP2 and later on Virtual
Server 2005 R2. This article has just been released.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;320220
I
Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Ultimate bare metal restore capability on any hardware comes to mind
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Microsoft has introduced support for Exchange 2003 SP2 and later on Virtual
Server 2005 R2. This article has just been released.
http
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Friday, 28 October 2005 11:40 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Hi Tony,
I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can just
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
41 matches
Mail list logo
