That's fugly if I've ever seen it. How many boxes
are actually affected?
This
would require some serious white board time to figure out and a *good* network
engineer, but what about bypassing NAT for the exposed systems? The issue as it
stands right nowis that the remote DC's are
-homing would be a feasable
solution for NATed networks?
Thanks,
Guido
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Willem
KasdorpSent: Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 20:42To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD in NATed
environments
I ran into this once. I
managed
I ran into this once. I managed to
convince the customer that it was a really bad idea. Youre right of
course, DDNS is a nono, you need some smart conversion of DNS records. That is
a big puzzle and a real administrative nightmare if you think it through. Some
other technical hurdles you
