+1
Regards,
Adrian
Jonas Lim wrote:
+1
Regards,
Jonas
- Original Message - From: Hiram Chirino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred
+1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time to put
out
a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary release of
ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-847?page=comments#action_36647 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-847:
I think 1) is a duplicate of AMQ-835 maybe?
Memory Leaks
Key: AMQ-847
On 7/20/06, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q1. Can anybody please tell me key differences between Stomp and Openwire.
Which one i should go for if i need to write a C++ Layer to talk to
ActiveMQ. Drawbacks and Advantages can help me a lot.
This was already answered in another thread
Incidentally I've struggled a bit with the release plugin in the past;
have found it a little temperamental. (I ended up not using it when I
released xbean as I just couldn't get it to work after following the
instructions to the letter). The bits I like though are all that
switching of poms,
+1
On 26 Jul 2006, at 06:26, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time
to put out
a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary release of
ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1/
The ActiveMQ Core Build on GBuild's Continuum (http://ci.gbuild.org/
continuum/target/) has been failing since July 7th. See http://
ci.gbuild.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm?
view=ProjectBuildbuildId=5212id=4 for the specific failures.
Are these tests failing for
