[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-468?page=comments#action_36504 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-468: ------------------------------------ We mght want to weight consumers via * the session (so replies tend to go to the session which sent a message) * the connection that sent the message * VM connections (which are generally cheaper to use) I guess we might want this to be configurable. > Queue load balancing - optionally give highest priority to the local > connection, then local broker then networks > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-468 > Project: ActiveMQ > Type: Improvement > Reporter: Rob Davies > Fix For: 4.1 > > > For Queues, as an option assign the highest priority for dispatching to the > local connection, then the local broker, then the cluster etc. > Right now we favour consumers on the local broker above consumers on remote > brokers. However we should prioritise consumers on the same session, > connection or VM transport above consumers in other processes etc -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
