Re: getopt long

2008-04-13 Thread Bill Luebkert
/Getopt/Long.pm > > My local 5.8.8 installation works fine because it appears to have 2.37 > "built-in", so I never had to install or upgrade. Older distributions > seem to have either not Getopt::Long or an antiquated version (I'm > relying on a function in 2.36+).

Re: getopt long

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Ellery
Bill Luebkert wrote: > Michael Ellery wrote: >> Michael Ellery wrote: >>> I've been under the impression that Getopt::Long is included with >>> most (if not all) distributions of perl. Recently I've encountered a >>> few Activestate versions that d

Re: getopt long

2008-04-13 Thread Bill Luebkert
Michael Ellery wrote: > Michael Ellery wrote: >> I've been under the impression that Getopt::Long is included with most >> (if not all) distributions of perl. Recently I've encountered a few >> Activestate versions that don't seem to have it installed. W

Re: getopt long

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Ellery
Michael Ellery wrote: > I've been under the impression that Getopt::Long is included with most > (if not all) distributions of perl. Recently I've encountered a few > Activestate versions that don't seem to have it installed. What the > current policy with this pa

getopt long

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Ellery
I've been under the impression that Getopt::Long is included with most (if not all) distributions of perl. Recently I've encountered a few Activestate versions that don't seem to have it installed. What the current policy with this package - is it included? As of which version