Bob Kline wrote:
> The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.
>> We'll be
>> catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
>> be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
>
>
The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
> Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.
> We'll be
> catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
> be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
Hello, Trent. I think you'
