Bob Kline wrote:
> The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.
>> We'll be
>> catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
>> be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
>
>
The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
> Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.
> We'll be
> catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
> be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
Hello, Trent. I think you'
Bob Kline wrote:
How much longer does ActiveState plan on using the old Microsoft
compiler (from VS6) for building Python for win32?
Basically we will follow what python.org does for its Python distros, so that
binary compatibility is maintained. This means that ActivePython 2.3.x builds
will be
Fair enough. You're right and I appreciate the correction.
--On Friday, October 01, 2004 9:37 AM -0400 Bob Kline
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Joanthan Gilligan wrote:
As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick
said last May that "a PyPPM-like tool is not
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Joanthan Gilligan wrote:
> As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick
> said last May that "a PyPPM-like tool is not tractable without high
> ongoing maintenance costs," which makes it "difficult to make a
> business case for a PyPPM-like tool."
That's
It's pretty straightforward to build Python and the Win32all extensions
with the newer VC++.NET compiler, so for people who need to build
additional modules there's no real need to use the Active State binary
distro.
As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick said
last
How much longer does ActiveState plan on using the old Microsoft
compiler (from VS6) for building Python for win32? Makes it a little
bit of a pain for building extensions. Especially during this limbo
period while we're waiting for PyPPM's replacement (any word on progress
for that?)
Thanks
