On 3/3/2011 2:32 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
>
> That's an old bug, and I believe the fix is simple (see comment #2). Are
> you still looking for a fix in 2.5? Or 2.7?
For our purposes, a fix for 2.7 would be sufficient. Can't speak to
others' needs.
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mai
Hi Bob,
Trent is no longer at ActiveState.
That's an old bug, and I believe the fix is simple (see comment #2). Are you
still looking for a fix in 2.5? Or 2.7?
-srid
On 2011-03-03, at 6:08 AM, Bob Kline wrote:
> Hi, Trent. How's progress on this bug?
>
> http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug
Hi, Trent. How's progress on this bug?
http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=72603
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com
___
ActivePython mailing list
ActivePython@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://lists
>> I'd also ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to verify the reasoning for
>> the change. Now that I think about it, the change could also be that
>> ActivePython's installer just now doesn't create that dir. It is
>> possible that that was an unintended subtle change.
>>
>
> Seems like the most like
Trent Mick wrote:
>> 1. Why the change?
>>
>
> This was a change in core PyWin32. I don't want to put words in the
> mouths of the PyWin32 developers, but I suspect the change was to (a)
> avoid putting temp info in the install area
Hmm. I'm all for having them avoid dropping temporary dr
Bob Kline wrote:
> We're building a new production server for one of our systems, and
> thought it would be a good time to bump up that system from Python 2.4
> to 2.5. Problem is, the web server, running under the machine's system
> account, can't see the registered COM libraries we've hooked
