Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] append vs append_rows

2009-05-25 Thread Anthony Eden
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Thibaut Barrère wrote: >> Also, while you are making changes, how about Google Groups for the mail >> list?  I saw a few other +1's on that.  Mailman archives are not nearly as >> easy to search and often seem to miss messages some messages from the >> archive.  Se

Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] append vs append_rows

2009-05-24 Thread Thibaut Barrère
> > Also, while you are making changes, how about Google Groups for the mail > list? I saw a few other +1's on that. Mailman archives are not nearly as > easy to search and often seem to miss messages some messages from the > archive. Searching google group archives is much easier and I suspect

Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] append vs append_rows

2009-05-24 Thread John Dell
Awesome! For the database extraction bits, I tried it as it reads, but it wouldn't work until I added :type => :database to the hash options (I read this somewhere in the list archives). Seems redundant. Anyway, I added that to the wiki docs. Any objects to breaking that page apart into several

Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] append vs append_rows

2009-05-24 Thread Carlo Cabanilla
Hooray! Thanks. I made the :append change. Might wanna throw up a redirect page on the old docs so people don't get confused. .Carlo On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Anthony Eden wrote: > Your wish is my command: > > http://wiki.github.com/aeden/activewarehouse-etl/documentation > > Consid

Re: [Activewarehouse-discuss] append vs append_rows

2009-05-24 Thread Anthony Eden
Your wish is my command: http://wiki.github.com/aeden/activewarehouse-etl/documentation Consider this the definitive source now for the AW ETL documentation. All are welcome to add to it. Sincerely, Anthony Eden On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Carlo Cabanilla wrote: > Hi, > > I found a bug i