If you contact Ali Wright at the SWT she can give the criteria for ancient
trees. Girth is important but there are other features as well.
Sarah
John Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this one qualifies, Sarah, but it looks like a very old
tree to me:
I don't know if this one qualifies, Sarah, but it looks like a very old
tree to me:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/755821653/
John
SARAH PATTON wrote:
Something to do on a rainy day
http://www.ancient-tree-hunt.org.uk/project/hunt/
There seems to be a
.
SxBRC is funded by a wide range of bodies; for a full list please see
www.sxbrc.org.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dom Green
Sent: 01 July 2007 13:29
To: adastra@lists.sxbrc.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Adastra] Ancient tree hunt
Yes
Yes, a disappointingly poor show from Sussex, especially given that the
county is still so well-covered in trees.
I know there are loads of very big trees, mainly beeches, in and around
Eridge Park Napp Wood, up on the Kent/Sussex border, as well as a
wonderful yew tree in Rotherfield
Something to do on a rainy day
http://www.ancient-tree-hunt.org.uk/project/hunt/
There seems to be a terrible lack of records from Sussex. I'm about to peruse
through a book I've had for a while - The Sussex Tree Book by Owen Johnson -
just as a starting point for exploring
