Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service Region

2015-05-08 Thread remco van mook
Three years and one day ago, I wrote on this very list: ...Personally I'm rather sick and tired of hearing people say 'yes, let's break IPv4 so we all MUST move to IPv6'. If you think this is good policy or even good engineering, please think again. It will make us end up with a broken internet

Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service Region

2015-05-08 Thread Hannigan, Martin
+1 Best, -M On May 8, 2015, at 9:40 AM, remco van mook remco.vanm...@gmail.commailto:remco.vanm...@gmail.com wrote: Three years and one day ago, I wrote on this very list: ...Personally I'm rather sick and tired of hearing people say 'yes, let's break IPv4 so we all MUST move to

Re: [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv4 Transfers in the RIPE NCC Service Region

2015-05-08 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight
If there was a magical wand that we could wave to make every ISP switch on IPv6 the problems with IPv4 pricing etc., would vanish. Unfortunately it doesn’t exist. Pushing IPv6 adoption is commendable, but we have to be realistic. IPv4 won’t vanish anytime soon. -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

2015-05-08 Thread Carlos Friacas
+1 support. Best Regards, Carlos Friaças On Thu, 7 May 2015, Carlos Gómez Muñoz wrote: Dear all, We, seap.es, the LIR requesting IPv6 space for the government authorities in Spain, are facing the same problem as Switzerland. Therefore, I support the proposed policy change. Best