Hi Jim,
Honestly I had a similar reaction when I first heard the suggestion -
considering how quiet the AP-WG has been of late, do we really have the need
for three chairs now?
As Gert wrote earlier, we have heard that some people want a systematic review
of the AP documents performed to
Thanks for the feedback so far Peter, Jan and Michiel. All noted.
>From my experience of operating multiple medium to very-large orgs\LIRs with
>many admins and teams of varying roles and responsibilities for RIPE DB
>maintenance, keeping contact data up-to-date for the different types
Hi everyone,
For those not already aware of recent discussions on the topic, there is an
ever increasing need primarily for network operators and others running the
internet, but also CSIRTs, certain governmental bodies, LEAs and more to have
contact details for IP networks correct at all times
+ 1 for Erik
Through his many years of positive contribution to this wg, I trust Erik has
the necessary AP knowledge and PDP experience to be a very good chair.
Hope all planning to travel make it to Marseille. See you there :)
Regards,
James
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Elvis Daniel, All,
Though I would like to read the Impact Analysis before committing, I am in
general support of this policy change. Improving transparency of basic IP
transfer data is a good thing for the community for the aforementioned reasons.
Particularly to improve the accuracy of
Hello,
random sub-groups sitting together in a smoke-filled room, one or two or the
other IRC channels, and throwing around ideas before bringing up something
formal is a good thing - as long as it's clearly understood that this is
informal.
+1
While no one wants this to snowball into
* Tore Anderson
Totally appreciate and agree with the government use case, or other such orgs
with multiple dispersed branches or end sites needing their own ISP
connectivity, especially for orgs that are not an ISP. But these are all of the
one entity, or legal affiliates within an umbrella
Good points, agreed.
It’s normal for some community members feel aggrieved by suspected serious foul
play, be it legit or not. Inevitable really, considering what has become the
(rather ugly) IPv4 gold rush.
However to echo Gert, APWG is not the place for raising claims. Better take
these
Well done to Callum for highlighting this issue. I also commend the /22
hoarding discussion. More should be done to address blatant RIPE abuse for
monetary gain. Turning a blind eye is quite alarming.
Regards,
James
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 May 2015, at 01:18, Infinity Telecom SRL
