Greetings,
Jordi, thanks for this work (and the diffchecker really helps!) :-)
This seems to be the simplest approach (organisation=LIR).
I don't believe we should keep the less explicit wording on the policy,
thus i support this proposal.
Best Regards,
Carlos Friaças
(pt.rccn)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:05:18
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Reply-To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR
Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Thanks Gert!
Further, having no inputs removes all the fun of the PDP!
In case you missed previous emails, to make it easier for you to comment, I've
prepared an on-line diff so you can easily track the proposed changes:
https://www.diffchecker.com/2mGPoRbo
Also, the complete text of the proposal is here:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-01
Now folks don't have any excuse to not comment ;-)
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net> en nombre de Gert Doering
<g...@space.net>
Fecha: lunes, 19 de marzo de 2018, 16:48
Para: Marco Schmidt <mschm...@ripe.net>
CC: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR
Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Dear AP WG,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:34:25PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6
Policy" is now available for discussion.
This policy proposal was prompted by the discussion at the last RIPE
meeting, where the NCC brought up the issue that the IPv6 allocation policy
talks about "organization" without ever defining what that is - "one LIR
account", "one legal organization" (which can hold multiple LIR accounts),
etc.
Jordi volunteered to clean up the text, and here's the proposed changes
- but without some feedback from *you*, we can't clean this up.
[..]
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 23 March 2018.
Thus: feedback please.
Like
- "the text matches the original intent as I have always understood the
policy, and we should go there"
- "this is not my understanding of the original policy, because ..."
- "never touch a working policy!"
- "I do not see this as a big problem, but the new text works for me"
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
