Hi Jens,
* Opteamax GmbH
as far as I am informed each V6- allocation made by RIPE had always a
reserved space after the actual allocation which allows extending
upto /27 ... so returning seems not to be necassary ... at least not
as long as /27 is sufficient.
Actually, the reservation is
If you want to be cheated, I won't be prevent it :)
12.07.2015, 20:12, Petr Umelov p...@fast-telecom.net:
What do you mean cheap talk?
One company can not setup more than one account. Is it enough for you?
But when you will understand it, it will be too late. Or the RIPE NCC wants
to
What do you mean cheap talk?
One company can not setup more than one account. Is it enough for you?
no. there is a simple a process (eurocratic though it may be). submit
a proposal. it is not that hard. as you said, marco is kind enough to
help.
fwiw, i, and i assume many others, would
Guten Tag,
What do you mean cheap talk?
One company can not setup more than one account. Is it enough for you?
...
I don't see any reasons of this proposal creation. Here are people who can
calculate all part of the transfers. But they are lazy and trust for WG.
(was it you who complained
Because of sellers won't be sell allocations and will consult how to open
multiple LIR accounts and their clients will be get more allocations than if
they would buy it as transfer from other LIR.
And clients will alert their partners and partners their partners and many
members will know
Procedural question: 2015-01 is still on track and this thread is not
influencing it in any way, correct?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
What do you mean cheap talk?
One company can not setup more than one account. Is it enough for you?
But when you will understand it, it will be too late. Or the RIPE NCC wants to
deplete IPv4 purposely to help to switch to IPv6.
I don't see any reasons of this proposal creation. Here are
