On 27/07/2015 12:53, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/07/2015 12:55, Saeed Khademi wrote:
As far as I know, having an AS number is necessary for BGP routing.
Now my question is that, if a customer doesn't have multiple links ( at
least 2 )
what is the use of having an AS number?
they may want to
Hi Marco,
I would also like to respond to the point that both you and Matthew made
about the RIPE NCC taking a more liberal approach in our interpretation.
There is a balance to be struck here, between allowing for corner cases, and
the requirements being clearly listed and adhered to. Our
Sorry new message on 2015-01.
No consensus was reached.
Even on RIPE website information that nothing interesting and good in
that proposal https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01
---
After analyzing the data that is currently available, the RIPE NCC does
not anticipate that
But everybody here just understood that nobody listen to them.
Yes. It's good idea to submit new policy canceling this one policy or
making it better! But if nobody listen to members why to do so?
Democracy sucks sometimes... unfortunately, most participants in the
list weighed the arguments
Hello Yuri,
No consensus was reached.
Yes there was. I declared so a few days ago. If you truly believe that my
decision to do that was wrong then please follow the Appeals procedure
described in section 4 of our PDP
(https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642) but please stop repeating
