Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

thank you for fast feedback >>>the RIPE NCC and Geoff Huston, and both independently have shown that the pool has an expected remaining lifetime of 4 to 4.5 years last 5mln will be enough for 2 3 years. and rest 14mln for much more from now. aprox 10 years or more. i dont agree with numbers.

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Greetings! As additional information for oppose this proposal I would like to say next: 1) RIPE has reserved space/free pool that it's also will be used under current polices for LIRs, there are a lot of space in it. And those space will be used for new LIRs. You can see that it will be enough

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

Hi, just to prevent any remote possibility of misunderstanding, I support this policy. Regards, - Håvard

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

I support this version of the policy proposal - all of my concerns I've voiced previously have been addressed. Remco > On 27 sep. 2016, at 15:08, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > The draft documents for version 4.0 of the policy proposal 2015-04, "RIPE >