Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

I think we introduced IPv6 PI because we needed to be able to give address space to entities that only need internal address space, want to be multi-homed, but would never allocate to 3rd party networks because they would only use it internally for their own business (for example a SAAS provider

Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

>> > Responding below, in-line. >> >> *PLEASE* use some meaningful way to quote and answer inline so a >> reader can distinguish between the original text and your answer. You >> current mode of answering is making this really hard. > > I will use [Jordi] to make it clear.

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2018-02 Assignment Clarification in IPv6 Policy - comments from today meeting

Hi Kai, Responding below, in-line. Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: address-policy-wg en nombre de Kai 'wusel' Siering Organización: Unseen University, Department of Magic Mails Fecha: miércoles, 16 de mayo de 2018, 20:37

Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

I will use [Jordi] to make it clear. Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: address-policy-wg en nombre de Maximilian Wilhelm Fecha: jueves, 17 de mayo de 2018, 17:36 Para: Asunto: Re:

Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

Hi Max, Thanks for your inputs. Responding below in-line. Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: address-policy-wg en nombre de Maximilian Wilhelm Fecha: viernes, 18 de mayo de 2018, 2:38 Para: