Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Review Phase Period extended until 10 February 2015 (Allow IPv6 Transfers)

2015-01-26 Thread Andre Keller
On 26.01.2015 10:38, Marco Schmidt wrote: We request your feedback, even if you have provided it during the initial Discussion Phase, so that the Working Group Chairs can determine whether there is rough consensus. Support Regards André

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-02 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Keep IPv6 PI When Requesting IPv6 Allocation)

2015-06-11 Thread Andre Keller
On 08.06.2015 15:43, Marco Schmidt wrote: We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 7 July 2015. support.

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)

2015-07-13 Thread Andre Keller
Hi, On 09.07.2015 14:19, Marco Schmidt wrote: We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 7 August 2015. tl;dr: I support the proposal in the current state. I do not really think this will help the routing table growth as

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

2014-12-09 Thread Andre Keller
Hi, On 09.12.2014 16:20, Marco Schmidt wrote: - Removal of the IPv6 requirement to receive Pv4 addresses from the RIPE NCC - Related wording adjustments in the title, summary and rationale of the proposal I support these changes and the proposal as it now stands. Regards André

Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

2015-04-23 Thread Andre Keller
Hi, On 23.04.2015 15:28, NTX NOC wrote: So the most profit comes to RIPE, but we still have the same LIR fees, Thats just not true. Regards André

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

2015-05-11 Thread Andre Keller
Hi, On 11.05.2015 13:43, Marco Schmidt wrote: We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 9 June 2015. I support this proposal. I do not think that this will have a big impact, but it certainly brings the policy in alignment with the