Hi Dave,
El 22/01/2015 a las 18:15, Dave Wilson escribió:
Note that arguments supporting the proposal says that the status quo
is actively troublesome for users of IPv6 PI space: to get a /22, they
have to disrupt their IPv6 installation to return their PI assignment
and get a PA allocation.
Hi Aleksi,
I'd like to state again, that sticking to the current policy is only
hurting people that have already adopted IPv6 using PI space. The bad
guys that aren't even planning to ever adopt IPv6 will happily reserve
an IPv6 block just to get more IPv4 addresses.
And I state again,
Hi,
Thats means policy is approved?
Regards,
El 14/04/2015 a las 11:28, Marco Schmidt escribió:
Dear colleagues,
The discussion period for the proposal described in 2015-01,
Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations has ended.
The RIPE NCC Impact Analysis will now be prepared
Support!
El 14/04/2015 a las 14:52, Marco Schmidt escribió:
Dear colleagues,
A proposed change to RIPE Document IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment
Policy
is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-02
Sorry, the IRC is NOT replacing this list.
The IRC is to complement this (and the others) lists.
I think is the perfect place to cook proposals, learn, know people (not
in the fb way) and just chit chat about whatever.
Here are good people with more or less experience that can help/teach on
El 12/08/2015 a las 16:53, Jim Reid escribió:
No. It can *never* be an official communication channel (whatever you mean by
that).
The only communication that matters for WG business is the mailing list.
Everything else is just noise.
It can be *just official noise* :)
Hello Carsten,
What I think David is trying to say is to make LIRs elegible for another
/22 out from the 185/8.
And He gives as example the recieved blocks from IANA:
45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255
45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255
45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255
This is a good example of a discussion
I thing he understand end user as a residential customer user.
But a residential customer user is not recieving the PA space, is the
ISP of the customer who recieve it.
LIR is not ISP. You can be a LIR and not an ISP and vice versa.
El 07/07/2015 a las 14:55, Nick Hilliard escribió:
On
Hi,
There is already 2015-01 to prevent abusing of the last /8 so we totally
oppose 2016-03.
Regards,
--Daniel
