Hello, Sander!
> - Did the NCC end the membership for violation of policies or
non-payment? In that case: yes, you don't have any rights to those
resources anymore
It's like a blast on resource users and I believe that exactly new address
policy can fix such situations.
Even violation of policies
it's just like an
administrator. We can fire administrator but current policy respectively
destroy building where administrator has worked.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 23:22, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 10:42:17AM +0300, Maxim A Piskunov wrote:
> > A
Thanks, Nikolay.
Also I should append that for stability of Internet end-users should be in
safety.
It's mean that never-never-never resources can not be under stress if they
currently in use!
Part of that - RIPE NCC should not have a rights to terminate SSA without
holding status for arbitration
will be closed.
And no another way for end-user.
One end least way for end-user - use PA and have risk of recall.
As result PI can't help cuz PI can't be issued anymore.
So time to change policy is coming.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 01:30, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote:
> Moin,
>
> on 06.03.2019 22:
sage IPv4,
for dropping not needed administrative obstacles.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 03:16, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote:
> Moin,
>
> am 06.03.2019 um 23:40 schrieb Maxim A Piskunov:
> > Hello, Kai!
> >
> > As I know, PI for IPv4 not possible to obtain for new users.
>
> Sure
ou wouldn't need CGN and also HA
> would be much easier (multiple routers on segment and so on). Technically
> the
> IPv6 should be faster, allows more freedom in network architecture and
> should
> require less logic in the network itself. It is mainly political problem,
> not
Hello, Gert, Community.
IPv4 - it's not outdated, exact about IPv4 we are talking. Not about IPv6.
And we discuss way to continue support and effective use IPv4 while IPv4
will be not needed anymore.
And while we still need IPv4 I wake up members to solve issues:
1. End-user should have
ain viruses. Clouvider Limited nor any of
> its employees therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
> omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy
> version.
>
> On 7 May
Hi, all!
Since time when AS was obtained to time when network will become multihomed
may passed some time, up to several years.
It's mean several kilometers of cables should be buried in the ground
before it happens. In some cases. Or the same onether kinds of tasks should
be done.
It's not mean
I explain a little more detailed.
Obtained in advance AS has about zero cost.
Real network resources has a solid costs. Resources should be registered at
first, like we register a firm before start to do something. We need some
lawful resource ability confirmation at first.
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at
I strongly take position that at least one AS any company may have in
advance. It's nothing, but it's make further pain is void.
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 16:55, Hansen, Christoffer
wrote:
>
> On 07/05/2019 14:18, Aled Morris via address-policy-wg wrote:
> > I'm in the process of helping a startup
n actions.
Anybody can't try to disable this possibility. I am shame people who trying
to take it from us.
Anybody can be applicant for AS. Even if currently network not multihomed.
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 17:03, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:51:13PM +0300, M
delegate pre approved AS-list to LIR for assigning
to their customers.
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 17:55, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
> > On May 7, 2019, at 10:16 AM, Maxim A Piskunov wrote:
> >
> > Possibility to have AS in advance - it's operator freedom in actions.
>
> > A
13 matches
Mail list logo
