Re: [address-policy-wg] Password

Pick one in the list : https://www.random.org/passwords/?num=5=18=html=new Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 9 apr. 2017 om 18:00 heeft Stephen Balogh het > volgende geschreven: > > Need password >

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

Hi Gert, I know you well enough to not take this personal and if you are not responding to me on a couple nudges, you must have a good reason for it. Thank you for the work and lets get started on the last call on this. Regards, Erik Bais > Op 7 feb. 2017 om 17:02 heeft Gert Doering

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

This is also my interpertation... If you use DHCP of any kind on the network to randomly provide a number for a device to connect to the network on a temp lease, it isn't an assignment to the letter of the policy. That is also not how the intent of the policy was written. If you assign a

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-05, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources"

Hi Nikolas, Thank you for the work and this update. Could you or Marco perhaps provide a quick update on what the current status is in the inter-rir transfer status between APNIC and RIPE region, after the APNIC exec-board announced that it would hold transfers until further notice earlier

Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-05, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources"

at 1:24 upto 1:35 at the mic on the topic. Regards, Erik Bais > Op 30 sep. 2015 om 21:05 heeft Erik Bais - A2B Internet > <eb...@a2b-internet.com> het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Nikolas, > > Thank you for the work and this update. > > Could you or Marco perhaps

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

closer to consensus. Nevertheless I think we should start discussing about how to enhance garbage collection, but this should IMHO not be part of discussion on _this_ proposal. BR Jens On 16.05.2015 09:11, Erik Bais - A2B Internet wrote: Hi Gert, There are a couple things that I keep

Re: [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hi Petr, Besides the fact that all discussion and input on the named policy is currently out-side the discusssion phase.. So the input can't be taken into account ... Could you provide insight in which universe the RIPE NCC is still allocating /20's ? I am aware that the IPRA's are trying