Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing, IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

Hi, > From: Peter Hessler > Then come back when you have a solution to force GitHub, Twitter, > Amazon, and a lot more, to launch an IPv6 version of their website. Hopefully it will come soon. At least all have already v6 prefixes used 'inside' their own networks .. signature.asc

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing, IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

> network/services, but they have dropped that in the meanwhile... Please don't tell me it's the IPv4 disposal technician [1] team :) 1. https://youtu.be/cNMQUCeNW78?t=2176 -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi Nick, Le 23/09/2017 à 21:41, Nick Hilliard a écrit : > Willy MANGA wrote: >> being a newbie here can you please explain briefly why, as of today , >> these people really need IPv4 addresses ? > > I'd be tempted to answer, except that you sent this email from an ipv4 &

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

ve any issue for 3rd party > networks -- they all still need IPv4 addresses. being a newbie here can you please explain briefly why, as of today , these people really need IPv4 addresses ? Or at least why they cannot start a transition process towards IPv6? Regards, -- Willy Manga @