Soon or late it will end up here to “IPv4 is DEAD, go and develop IPv6”, that’s
a regular answer here when you bring up something related to IPv4 J
Your idea looks like a disk defragmentation procedure, but first you need to
check how many percent it is defragmented and how much free
Hi
Clarification question.
Are you requesting that non-continuous IPv4 blocks be exchanged for the
equivalent size in a single continuous IPv4 block that does not match the
previously issued IPv4 addresses, or do you want to take continuous IPv4
blocks and combine them?
On 2016 Sep 22 (Thu) at
Guten Tag,
> Hello,
>
> One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd like to
> suggest the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange number of
> blocks of IP ranges for a greater block.
>
> For example:
> LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User can exchange
> these
Hello,
One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd like to suggest
the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange number of blocks of IP
ranges for a greater block.
For example:
LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User can exchange
these subnets for 1 x /20
Hello
The suggestion help IP broker to made bigger IP block and earn more
money. bigger IP block is more expensive than smaller one. :)
Also why RIPE NCC should return "Spam dirty" IP range and assign new one
to a user?
Thanks
On 9/22/2016 4:07 PM, Ping IP wrote:
Hello,
One of the
