Re: [Suggestion] Runtime sanitizer, or minimal sanitized binary

2018-03-07 Thread jinb . park7
> > > :: for user-space binary It is similar to memcheck of valgrind. > > How will it be different from memcheck? ASAN is already similar to > memcheck, just faster. So why not just use ASAN? > I have to do investigate more to answer this question... > > > Perform the wrong shift. ==> I

Re: [Suggestion] Runtime sanitizer, or minimal sanitized binary

2018-03-07 Thread 'Dmitry Vyukov' via address-sanitizer
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:48 PM, wrote: > >> >> > :: for user-space binary It is similar to memcheck of valgrind. >> >> How will it be different from memcheck? ASAN is already similar to >> memcheck, just faster. So why not just use ASAN? > > I have to do investigate more to answer this question

Re: [compiler-rt] Use of ESR context in AArch64 sigframe

2018-03-07 Thread 'Dmitry Vyukov' via address-sanitizer
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > On 03/06/2018 08:58 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As part of some recent work to harden the Kernel Address Space Layout >> Randomisation (KASLR) implementation in arm64 Linux, I've proposed a >> patch for the kernel which omits the