Re: Using Scratch Volumes

2001-07-18 Thread Jörg Nouvertné
You have to checkin the scratch volumes beforehand, *SM won't ask for them. Kind regards, Jörg -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug McLauchlan Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 03:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using Scratch

Preemption not working

2001-07-18 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers! Today, again all my client backups were hanging. Again I encountered a 100% full diskpool, but this time it was caused by a very long running backup stgpool. Migration was running, but waiting for mountpoints. According to the Admin Guide, migration processing has a higher priority

offsite copy

2001-07-18 Thread Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IST)
How to implement offsite backup copy ... I have two primary tape storage pools for backup and archive. I need to send offsite the backup copy of my primary tape storage for archive. I created one copy storage pool and backup my primary tape storage pool. Then, how do i send this backup copy

Re: Tivoli for Domino

2001-07-18 Thread Andre Schwier
Hi together, hi Del i´m running version 1.1.1 of TDP for Domino. Plattform is Windows 2000. Transaction logging is set to archival an the command domdsmc archivelog is working from the console also. But when i´m running my scheduler which is the same scheduler i´m using for my other clustered

Antwort: Preemption not working

2001-07-18 Thread Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
Eric, it really is a deep s***, and you could report it, but the answer would be: Works as designed When you read the Preemption section of the Admin Guide, you'll see, that only the following actions would cause TSM to cancel another process when needing mount-points = Backup database, Restore,

Re: Backupsets question

2001-07-18 Thread Matthew Large
None specifically about backupsets, but the admin guide and reference manual have plenty. Do you have a problem? -Original Message- From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2001 21:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backupsets question Is there any

Output query

2001-07-18 Thread Marc Lowers
Could someone explain to me the log file output from a backup below? ie. what is meant by 'Full: 0' and the 'Read' and 'Written' columns? Being a bit new to this I'm not sure why I see this on some of the files we backup and not others. Thanks. Backing up database \CDM\CDMOPER.NSF, 1 of 2.

Re: offsite copy

2001-07-18 Thread Herfried Abel
Zosimo, 1) backup stg_pool copy_pool 2) q vol * stg=copy_pool acc=readwr shows a list of volumes for each volume ( a_vol ) in this list do 3) upd vol a_vol acc=offsite 4) checkout libv yourlibrary a_vol 5) take all checked out volumes and ship them offsite :-) herfried Zosimo Noriega

selective backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Eugene Awyong - Singapore
I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in one of my servers. It is run via crontab, this is how the script file looks like dsmc selective /documentum/ /oracle7/ However, I realise when I do it, it doesn't quite seem to back up the directories below that of

Re: selective backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Reinhard Mersch
Eugene Awyong - Singapore [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in one of my servers. It is run via crontab, this is how the script file looks like dsmc selective /documentum/ /oracle7/ However, I realise when I do it, it

Re: selective backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IST)
Eugene, just add -subdir=yes option from your script. like this: dsmc selective /documentum/ /oracle7/ -subdir=yes regards, -Original Message- From: Eugene Awyong - Singapore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: Preemption not working

2001-07-18 Thread Horst Scherzer
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: Hi *SM-ers! Today, again all my client backups were hanging. Again I encountered a 100% full diskpool, but this time it was caused by a very long running backup stgpool. Migration was running, but waiting for mountpoints. According to the Admin Guide,

General PREEMPTION Question

2001-07-18 Thread Herfried Abel
Hi to all, The long story: We are running a rather old ADSM server version : 3.1.2.20 and we will upgrade to 4.? in august. With the version we are running now, I have problems related to the default preemption strategy. In gernal I think it is a good thing, but we have one special application

TDP for Domino - Brick level backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Ofer vaknin
Hi Does TDP for Domino can do a brick level backup?

TSM modules for Perl

2001-07-18 Thread Jörg Nouvertné
Hi all, because of the large interest in the TSM for PERL Module, I've created a homepage which will be used for updates and news for the time being (don't blame me on the design ;-)). Have a look at: http://home.wtal.de/the_swordsman In regards to the name space: I discussed this issue

Re: Antwort: Preemption not working

2001-07-18 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Gerhard! You are right, the backup stgpool command is not on the priority list. If this means that a backup stgpool will never be canceled, I think this is a really serious problem. What if a client, or several (new) clients are generation a lot of backup data. In this case your backups

Re: TDP for Domino - Brick level backup?

2001-07-18 Thread J?rg Nouvertn?
What do you mean by Brick Level Backup? If the question is Does TDP for Domino can do a document level backup? the answer is No. The behaviour has changed from Notes Version 4.x to 5. The TDP for Domino is using the Domino transaction functionality to perform incremental backups, which means

Re: TDP for Domino - Brick level backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Ofer vaknin
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino provides two types of database backup—incremental and selective—and a log archive function. Incremental backup provides a conditional backup function that creates a full on-line backup of Domino databases, when necessary. The specific conditions that

Re: TDP for Domino - Brick level backup?

2001-07-18 Thread J?rg Nouvertn?
Hi, the answer is yes and no, since brick level does not apply to the Domino infrastructure. No, you cannot restore just a single document, you have to restore the DB and copy the document over. Yes, if you are talking about a user's mail box. In Domino, every user has his own database, you

Re: selective backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Richard Sims
I use the selective backup function to do a daily backup of 2 directories in one of my servers... ... However, I realise when I do it, it doesn't quite seem to back up the directories below that of these 2 directories? ... Two things... 1. You don't want to back up directories every time you do

Re: offsite copy

2001-07-18 Thread Richard Sims
1) backup stg_pool copy_pool 2) q vol * stg=copy_pool acc=readwr shows a list of volumes for each volume ( a_vol ) in this list do 3) upd vol a_vol acc=offsite 4) checkout libv yourlibrary a_vol Tip: Consider using the often-overlooked Query MEDia command to generate command lists that

OS error reports

2001-07-18 Thread Matthew Large
Perhaps you can help me.. I need to know what facilities each of the TSM supported OS's has to report problems.. ie NT = Event Log, AIX = errpt What is there for: Solaris HP OS390 AS400 MVS VM ? Any responses greatly appreaciated! Many Thanks Regards, Matthew Matthew Large TSM Consultant

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Preemption not working

2001-07-18 Thread Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
Eric, it is a problem, I guess we all know that. And the same happens, when you have only 2 mount points and Reclamation is running, or something else and the Migration cannot clean up the Diskpool by migrating to tape, because of the missing mount point. We solved the problem by 1) defining 3

Re: Output query

2001-07-18 Thread Del Hoobler
Marc, Full: tells you how many data transfer buffers are fill at a current instance in time. The number of buffers can be changed by using the BUFFERS option/preference setting. Read: tells you how many bytes of data have been read from the database file at a current instance in time. Written:

ACL Notes Database

2001-07-18 Thread Maurizio Conti
With ADSM Connect for Lotus Notes , when j launch a dsmnotes restore ,is it important l'id file used? After the restore i verify the user activity on the database properties, and result the id server that had modified the documents... Is This Important??? Thank Maurizio COnti

Re: What would you think would happen..........

2001-07-18 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Thanks for the info. Yes, we are doing a point in time restore. Churchfield, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/17/2001 05:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re:

Re: Tivoli for Domino

2001-07-18 Thread Del Hoobler
Andre, We have not seen this problem yet. It should not matter whether the server is a member of a Domino server cluster or not. Please call IBM support. A trace may help determine what is going on. Lotus will also need to get involved since it is the Lotus API that determines when logs are

Maxsize problem?

2001-07-18 Thread Ton de Wekker
We have recently installed an NSM C01 with an IBM 3584 LTO library. TSM level is V4.1 We use a DISKPOOL and a TAPEPOOL. We defined a MAXSIZE=1G for the DISKPOOL. TAPEPOOL is the nextpool of the DISKPOOL. When we are backing up files we notice that all files smaller than 1 GB are not being backed

Multiple IBM3570 libraries on a single TSM Server.

2001-07-18 Thread BENTON Michael
My Current TSM server has ONE IBM3570 B12 tape library attached and defined. I do not use DISK storage pools, but write backup/archive data direct to tape storage pools. I would like to add another IBM3570 B12 tape libary to the same TSM server ? Can this be done ? What are the implications for

Re: Archive Question

2001-07-18 Thread Bill Wheeler
Thanks for all the help. Now I can understand why there is a fluctuation in the amount archived when looking through the activity log. -Original Message- From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Archive

Re: selective backup?

2001-07-18 Thread Matthew Large
The option subdirectory=yes needs to be included in the statement. your backup script would read: dsmc selective -subdir=yes /documentum/ /oracle7/ Try this. if it doesn't work (which it should) let us know.. Regards, -Original Message- From: Eugene Awyong - Singapore [mailto:[EMAIL

Session lost after upgrade to TSM 3.7.2.17

2001-07-18 Thread Ruomiao Wang
We upgrade a TSM client from ADSM 3.016 to TSM v. 3.7.2.17. Ever since the upgrade, the client has been experiencing session lost: This is from the dsmsched.log: 07/18/2001 08:18:50 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 10058 07/18/2001 08:18:50 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 07/18/2001

Windows Client Tcp Read Errors

2001-07-18 Thread Bruce Lowrie
Is anyone out seeing this on their Windows NT clients (TSM Version 4.1.2). 07/18/2001 10:29:41 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 10058 07/18/2001 10:29:41 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. Some receive this and some don't even on the same same subnet. Bruce E. Lowrie Sr. Systems Analyst

Shared Memory driver on Server startup

2001-07-18 Thread Block, Clemens
Hi all! Today I installed a TSM 4.1x Server from scratch on a Solaris 8 machine. I started with installation of release 4.1.0.0 form the CD (server and client). I made a minimum Configuration in the server and client config files. Then I started the server once, only to test if it could run

Re: Shared Memory driver on Server startup

2001-07-18 Thread west suhanic
I do not think that Shared Memory is supported for TSM 4.1 under Solaris. I believe TSM 4.2 will provide this. - Original Message - From: Block, Clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:50 PM Subject: Shared Memory driver on Server startup Hi

Re: Offsite volume in strange state

2001-07-18 Thread Thomas Denier
Quoting Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bring the volume back (it's empty, anyway). Check it in, run AUDIT VOL FIX=YES. That usually fixes this problem. I had the volume retrieved from the vault and inserted into the tape library. TSM under OS/390 does not have a check-in procedure of its

TransWin32RC(): Win32 RC 1 from FileRead(): ReadFile

2001-07-18 Thread Paul Zarnowski
Has anyone seen the following error on a WinNT system? This happened on a system running client v3.7.2.17, but I have not been able to reproduce it on a test box here. The error is preventing the partition from getting backed up. Thanks in advance. 07/10/2001 04:02:38 ANS4018E Error

Re: Offsite volume in strange state

2001-07-18 Thread Rushforth, Tim
The command failed with the following message: ANRD ASVOL(2751): Volume 600206 cannot be deleted to SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references. Attempts to run the 'audit volume' command again fail because the access is offsite. Attempts to change the access to read/write or read-only fail

AIX 4.3.3 and ML8

2001-07-18 Thread Lisa Cabanas
Has anyone successfully applied ML 8 to 4.3.3 and NOT have SCSI adapters and 3590 drives disappear? We just updated to ML8 and upon IPL lost one of the SCSI adapters and four of our 3590 drives, and running cfgmgr doesn't get them back. We are at 4.1.3.0 TSM server level, and the latest for

Re: AIX 4.3.3 and ML8

2001-07-18 Thread Leven, Chris
I applied it a few weeks ago with no problems. Possibly the microcode level on the scsi adapters was too backlevel? Christopher Leven Senior Programmer/Analyst IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration IBM Certified Specialist AIX Support IBM Certified Specialist RS6000/SP - PSSP 3.1 Garlock

Re: AIX 4.3.3 and ML8

2001-07-18 Thread Lisa Cabanas
The CE just installed these less than a month ago-- we are sharing the drives between two TSM servers. I tried to find the microcode level, but couldn't (I am the TSM admin, and am (always) learning AIX. Would you please tell me what command to use, and what microcode level is current. The

Mismatch between bytes transferred and data in storage pool

2001-07-18 Thread Eric Winters
I have a mismatch between the quantity of data being backed up overnight (according to the accounting log) and the amount of data within my disk storage pool in the morning. My accounting log says I've backed up 360 GB. The activity log confirms this (adding up entries like this one). 07/19/01