Happy new year TSMers,
I have this warning when I start a SAP backup.
Warning: Can not open the message-catalog 'backintv3.cat'.
Make sure that you have the correct $NLSPATH and $LANG environment
settings
and that the 'backintv3.cat' file is installed in the correct place.
Now we use the
anyone using TSM client 4.1.x on Linux Red Hat 7.2 to backup filesystems
and Databases on TSM 4.1.2 running on AIX.
Does TSM support Red Hat Linux 7.2.
Thanks and regards
sree.
Dear Sree,
We use redhat 7.2 for My SQL, Apache and as a filer,
We installed TSM 4.2. and it works fine.
Do not forget to stop and start databases when jou want to have a clean back-up of the database.
Greetz,
Koen.
"Every brilliant
Hi,
Did you maybe change te compression settings on this client? If so, change
them back to be able to restore these files...
Help on a restore.
I have a unix admin who sent me this message:
That's right, I'm not yet sure if I really have a problem, but on 95% of
the files I'm restoring
Hi all,
First of all, I whish you a happy new year.
Does anybody has already perform and Win2000 Defrag disk on a TSM Server ?.
My database file containt about 100K Fragments (Info coming from Win2K
Server Mgmt).
In a general way could we defrag using (W2K Defrag) any kind of TSM Volumes
(DB,
Hi Eric!
W2K defrag will be finished very quickly. Defrag performs defragmentation on
the file level. Since your logvolume contains just one file (the TSM
recovery log file) there isn't much to defragmentize. Same goes for the
storage pool volumes.
A TSM database defrag utility is something on
Make sure file backintv3.cat resides in /usr/lib/nls/msg/en_US and
/usr/lib/nls/msg/En_US.
-Original Message-
From: Gianni Garda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDP warning
Happy new year TSMers,
I have this warning
Our TDP for MSSQL backup is failing.. this is a newly installed
clustered win2k server.. I'm not sure whats happening here. I see the
one error below in sqlsched.log but would that cause it to hang? It
seems to hang and not complete it's backup. At 7:30 it giving up and
marks it as failed.
Hello,
Just need some advice to push me in the right direction.
I am currently running ADSM 3.1 (stoneage I know) with a IBM3570 Magstar.
We have bought TSM version 4.2 and IBM3583 that I will install.
What would the advice be to upgrade the old version of ADSM or to make a
complete new
Both systema are very diferent, so I would do a new installation.
The other cuestion: Yes, you can run several tsm servers on the same network,
please read the information about enterprise server on TSM guide 4.2
Good luck!
Juanma.
Ok I found the summary info:
START_TIME: 2002-01-02 03:00:14.00
END_TIME: 2002-01-02 03:00:54.00
ACTIVITY: BACKUP
ENTITY: UNXR
EXAMINED: 234
BYTES: 16321897
START_TIME: 2002-01-02 03:00:21.00
END_TIME: 2002-01-02 04:20:10.00
ACTIVITY: BACKUP
ENTITY: UNXR
Upgrade or new install depends on whether you need any of your old
backup data or not. Typically when I do an ADSM to TSM upgrade (I am in
the midst of one now for a customer) I do a combination of an upgrade
and a new install. What I mean by that is that I save the ADSM/TSM
database and
Hello,
I suggest an new install. The database engines in version 3.1 are very bad.
So you will have an bad performance when you upgrade to 4.2. It is possible
but not recommended.
For the second question you'll need to reed the manuals. I think it is
possible. The installations wil be in
How to run multiple TSM Server on 1 machine:
- create a new directory for the dsmserv.opt
- copy and adjust the dsmserv.opt
- format and initialize new db and log volumes
- DSMSERV_DIR environment variable points to server executable directory
- Make sure TCPPORT (1502) and HTTPPORT (1582) are
Hendrik,
So maybe you should upgrade first an then start an second TSM-server. Then
migrate all your servers to the second one an finally delete the old
tsm-server.
Ronald Bazuin
Fortis Insurrance
NL
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You may need to also define a seperate scratch and private category for the
new ADSM server.
Jeff Bach
-Original Message-
From: Bazuin R. (Ronald) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrade or new install??
Eric,
The closest thing out there is the UNLOAD/LOAD command for the database. I
did that for a 10GB database with 72 million objects and the performance
enhancement was incredible. But Eric van Loon is right... a defrag for the
database volume would be nice.
Happy New Year!
Brian Scott
EDS -
Hi
Happy new year to u all.
Can u pl help me with this question.
I have seen sometimes Idlewait time keeps incrementing in spite of client
getting backed up.
Thanks in advance.
tsm: TSMquery session
Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name
Number Method State
When we upgraded our server a year and a half ago, we also upgraded our
Tivoli from ADSM Ver. 3.1X to TSM Ver. 3.7X
The method we chose was:
1. Performed a fresh install of Ver. 3.7 to the new server from the CD, and applied
the latest PTF.
2. Set up database volumes, log volumes, defined the
-BALANAND-
Session 2,763 is the Producer session which remains in an Idlewait state
because it obtains a list of file information from the TSM server for the
files that have previously been backed up for this client and places them in
memory on the client machine. It places this list of files in
I believe your answer would be that your idle session is your Hunter
session. This is the process that is scanning the files for which ones to
backup. This session finished scanning but the data mover session is still
transferring data. The idle session is waiting for the data mover to finish
This is because the server is waiting on the client to respond to the
last request for data. During this time the client is not sending data
to the server.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent Consultant IBM Server/Storage Sales Rep.
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified
But I see that recv data gets incremented .That's the surprise ?
Then why was data getting geting xfered.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WHy Idle wait keeps incrementing?
Hello-
I am having a memory problem.
I am runnning AIX 4.3.2 on a H50. TSM is the only application
running on the server. When I run vmstat I get the following...
kthr memory page faultscpu
- --- ---
The idle wait applies to session 2763, while the bytes received applies to
session 2764. These are two separate/independent sessions, so there is no
direct relationship between what happens on one session and what happens
on the other session. However, there is an *indirect* relationship. Based
Happy new year all...
I was freeing up some tapes today and noticed the unreadable bytes number was not
zero. Is there any way to determine what files had a problem. The move data's are
completing successfully according to the act log.
Thanks
Joe Cascanette
The Cumis Group Limited
Server -
Have you tried tsm q content volname f=d ?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Cascanette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unreadable bytes
Happy new year all...
I was freeing up some tapes today and noticed the unreadable
I also found a VERY old APAR which sounds similiar:
APAR= PQ06541 SER=IN INCORROUT
QUERY PROC SHOWS NUMBER OF UNREADABLE BYTES 0 BUT 10 FOR
TAPE TO TAPE MIGRATION
Status: CLOSED Closed: 07/18/97
Apar Information:
RCOMP= 565511901
what does everyone else do for bare metal restores on SGI?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Seay, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2 dsmc errors on irix 6.5 client.
Yeah, I caught that. I do not know of a way to
I tried it, however it does not show what files had problems moving to another tape.
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unreadable bytes
Have you tried tsm q content
I've seen this for a couple of versions. I'm a bad boy in that I have not
reported it. I think there is some slight bug when a move data starts: a
counter is not being zeroed as it should be before the processing starts.
As long as the number of unreadable files stays zero I believe you're OK.
The pi and po columns are pretty normal for AIX, since it uses memory for
I/O buffer space. The SR to FR ratio is what you look at for memory
overcommitment. You start to work when the ratio is 5 or more. The only
outlier is the wait I/O which is very high and should be fixed as Richard
Yep seen that one too, but the bytes are around 140,000,000 (140 megs!), but the move
data is still showing completed successfully.
I have opened a call just to make sure..
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002
I'd trust more experienced help, but here
are my thoughts . . .
pi + po indicate you are constantly paging. This probably
means you need more memory, but could be caused by aggressive
aix filesystem caching. If so, vmtune can help limit
filesystem caching.
Your cpu is hardly being hit. us +
Hi
Pl use crush to solve memory leak problems.
CPU utilization problems CAN BE ELIMINATED WITH ps aux cmd because
its the application. Use TOPAS cmd also which is GUI tool .
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: Denis L'Huillier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002
Hi Denis,
I think your using too much memory for file caching. Here's why:
a couple of things:
your box is out of 'real' memory, 'fre' column.
ignore 'r' and 'b', for now
any number in the pi and po columns are bad
The 'sr' search column is how many pages in the list where searched before 'fr'
Hello,
Can anyone help me with this error. Receiving ANS1312E Server media mount
not possible while running backups. The
error is intermittent, not receiving it on all backups. I am currently
running TSM 4.1.3.0 and the client is 4.1.0.0.
We are backing up straight to tape, and all drives are
Good Afternoon,
A client is having trouble locating archived files using dsmc q ar. The problem
seems to be that the filespace_name and hl_names differ between the files, even
though they were archived from the same place.
Server: AIX, ADSM v3.1
Client: SunOS, ADSM v3.1
An example:
select
Hello Mike,
In UNIX, a filespace for ADSM is a filesystem. So in this case,
it looks like the /work is the filespace unless you have mapped
a directory like /work/data as a nfs at the time of the backup or
perhaps you have used the client option virtualmountpoint.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vo
Hello Tom,
Are these sessions created by the admin command line or by the web?
This could be caused by the APAR IC30203:
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMAND-LINE SESSIONS MAY HANG ON THE TSM SERVER
IF THE SESSIONS ARE CANCELLED WHILE AWAITING SERVER RESPONSE
The APAR is fixed in the 4.1.5.0 server
On 2 Jan 2002 at 14:29, Keith Kwiatek wrote, in part:
what does everyone else do for bare metal restores on SGI?
Bare metal restores? I walk the beach, enjoy the sunsets...
What? Oh. You didn't mean St. George Island, FL? Never mind.
(sorry) Happy New Year to all, wayne
Wayne T. Smith
If the volume is a database backup, Export, or scratch tape that was checked in as
private, it will not show using a q vol. Check your volume history file to see if it
shows
up there.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Levitan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002
What I wanted to know was is it is normal for idle session to scan which is
doing nothing for 3hrs.
And still I see data xfer on recv state session.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm working on setting this up on a new cluster. The redbook that Tivoli
directed me to is a bit out of date. I can tell because when I tried to
install the first service it gave errors of missing options. Maybe someone
can help me a bit on this.
The cluter name is CP-ITS-SQLCL01
the node names
Kelly
I've seen this for a couple of versions. I'm a bad boy in that I have
not
reported it. I think there is some slight bug when a move data starts:
a
counter is not being zeroed as it should be before the processing starts.
As long as the number of unreadable files stays zero I believe
Hi Denis,
It's too early to determine if you need a memory upgrade. First let's
analyze the situation...
At first look your CPU seems to be overcommited because the idle column is
about 11%. But if you sum the columns user and system it's about 23%. This
is your real CPU utilization, so it's too
Does the backup complete after logging the ANS1312E error msg?
If so has the backup been tested by restore?
Any intermittent issues when backing up the Database?
Sam.
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Palm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:05
47 matches
Mail list logo
