Re: True statement???

definitely NO (if you are not talking about NT v0.357 :) You can have more interfaces limited by number of slots and maximum number of particular adapter combinations supported by the HW platform/drivers/OS. TSM does not deal with SCSI direct but through OS and drivers. NT 4 does not limit to

Re: TSM 5.1

Many customers have installed TSM 5.1. I have been involved with one install personally. -- Joshua S. Bassi Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com IBM Certified - AIX 5L, SAN, Shark eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (415) 215-0326 -Original

Re: LTO don't need clean up?

Sure, my cleaning cartridge is labeled CLNI64L1 ... and it is in library inventory. My premise was using of TSM automated cleaning method with CLEANFREQ=ASNEEDED. This way I can track number of clenanings left on cartridge. In case of library-automated method (you mentioned Zlatko), can I track

Re: LTO don't need clean up?

Of course, cleaner tape is present in library inventory, I have checked it with CHECKIN LIBVOLUME library SEARCH=BULK STAT=CLEANER CLEANINGS=50 ... I think it is OK. Tom -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Stapleton Sent: Tuesday,

Re: server-to-server copy-pools

Other server is related not to copy pool but to the device class. You have only to define second pool over same devclass. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Help about TSM API: partial object retrieve

Hi all, Who can help me that I can't retrieve partial object by TSM API. a part of my source: /*/ dsmGetList getList; // for object list on dsmBeginGetData() PartialObjData partialObjData; // for partial object retrieve

Re: LTO don't need clean up? WARNING!!!

Hi guys. You need to know this! DONT USE HP CLEANING TAPES ON IBM DRIVES. a LTO guru at IBM told me this. That they found out that ther is some other cemiclas on the cleaning tapes form HP than in the IBM tapes. therefore they say that you can destroy your drives by using HP cleaning tapes on

Re: True statement???

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin Is this a true statement? You can have multiple Tivoli SM servers but only two SCSI interfaces per TSM NT server. No. I know that TSM 4.1.x on a Compaq server can handle 3 fast-wide SCSI cards. Where did

Re: True statement???

need more information: I cannot judge this, because I do not know who you are/is. I definitely can have more or less than two SCSI Interfaces per TSM NT server ;) Juraj -Original Message- From: Fletcher, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL

Library Sharing

Can I use the Library Sharing feature without a SAN environment? I have TSM 4.2.1.11 on AIX 4.3.3 with IBM 3584 LTO Tape Library which we want to share with another TSM server if possible. Rajesh ___ WIN a first class trip to Hawaii. Live

Re: True statement???

I have 2 four port SCSI raid controllers and 2 adaptec SCSI controller on my TSM server that is running NT. -Original Message- From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: True statement??? From: ADSM: Dist

Re: Dynamic allocation of FC Ultrium drives ... Is it possible ?

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PAC Brion Arnaud I would like to know if it is possible to share directly attached FC Ultrium drives in a 3584 library, between multiple TSM servers, without using the 3584 library sharing feature. This would mean a

Re: TSM 5.1

Not sure if this is appropriate or will muddy the water. But, we have a 3466-C00 (Network Storage Manager) that will be upgraded this weekend to TSM 4.2.1.x. In the process, the AIX OS will be upgraded from AIX 4.3.3 to 5.1.0.x. My submission is that perhaps you should check your AIX requirements

Re: server-to-server copy-pools

run stg pool backups in more than one session parallel : maxproc=2 update dev mountlimit=2 or higher -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 5 juni 2002 7:47 Aan:

errors with backups

I am having this error show up in the dsmerror log on my client (a lot of files have the same error). 06/05/2002 03:36:46 fioScanDirEntry(): Can't map object 'E:\data\Visual Merchandising\personal Folders\Kathy\KATHY LANGE\bintopguide\bin top

Re: Can't do reclamation

First, you need the answers to a couple of questions. When was the last time you did an EXPIRE INVENTORY command. How many tapes are in the storage pool and what is the storage pool's value for 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed'? Other than that, you should be good to go! John G. Talafous

Re: TSM 5.1

That's great to hear, was wondering if the Migrate install from TSM 4.1.5.3 is fairly smooth? Regards, Charles -Original Message- From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 Many customers have

Re: True statement???

See Subject - IBM 3584 L32 LTO configuration question Kevin Fletcher SSCI Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them all yourself. -Original Message- From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:45 AM To: [EMAIL

IBM 3584 L32 LTO configuration question

I have an IBM 3584 L32 LTO library. It has 4 drives. I have it connected to an HP LH3 server running NT 4.0 and TSM 4.2. I have 1 Symbios SYM22910 SCSI controller card with 2 channels connected to this library. One channel is interfacing with two of the drives + the library and the other

TSM 5.1 and W2000

Has anyone upgraded to 5.1 from 4.1 on Windows 2000 platform? Any issues? Mark Kordsmeier St. Joseph Mercy Health System

5.1 Database Restore; External Library Manager

I came across an interesting anomaly when restoring the 5.1 TSM Database when an external library manager is implemented. With 5.1 TSM, external libraries are supported using DEFINE PATH. Well, the result of DEFINE PATH does NOT put EXTERNALMANAGER=blah in the devconfig file. What this means is

Re: TSM 5.1

I have one server upgraded, AIX 4.3 running TSM 5.1.0.2. The issue I am having is with copy storage pool. It will not use any tape unless the tape has been previously used by the backup pool. I am working with TSM level 2. They are trying to duplicate this. I am getting the same results on a

AIX TSM Client 4.2.2.1 released

Guys, In case you didn't know, 4.2.2.1 client has just been released for AIX. You can grab it from:- ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r2/AIX/v4221/AIX43 Kind Regards, Roy Lake RS/6000 TSM Systems Administration Team Tibbett Britten European I.T.

Re: Library Sharing

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rajesh Oak Can I use the Library Sharing feature without a SAN environment? I have TSM 4.2.1.11 on AIX 4.3.3 with IBM 3584 LTO Tape Library which we want to share with another TSM server if possible. Not really. In order to

Re: 5.1 Database Restore; External Library Manager

Good idea. Tried it. No difference. EXTERNALMANAGER=blah parameter still not in devconfig. -Original Message- From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 5.1 Database Restore; External Library Manager Did

management class question?

Does anyone know how to tell what management class a filespace belongs too from the server side? Is there a select or a query command? --Justin Richard Bleistein

Re: errors with backups

Hi, What error ANR or ANS, show up in the dsmerror log on your client ? --- Kind Regards, Elenara Geraldo Analyst Support MML Systems Phone: 55 41-342-7864 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:50:39 Rob Schroeder wrote: I am having this error show up in the dsmerror log

Re: Library Sharing

I'm not sure what is meant by library sharing here. the way I know it is kind of like Mark here says: you can share a 3584 in the sense that, since the library has multiple control paths you can partition it between heterogeneous OSs (which is what you cannot do with the 3583, being that single

Re: Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

To the best of my knowledge, TSM 5.1 is not supported for Win9x clients. Regards, Matt Adams Tivoli Storage Manager Team Hermitage Site Tech Deloitte Touche USA LLP 615.882.6861 -Original Message- From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:07 AM

Re: The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message

You need to do a full backup. And make sure you have available drives when you start it. -Original Message- From: Rob Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message Hello all, This is my

AW: errors with backups

I think this is a unicode problem. The question mark in OStep14mens?17 denotes the character that can't be mapped to the local ANSI codepage. I think you have to go to TSM 4.2 server to solve this problem. Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards Thomas Rupp UIS - Informatik Services Vorarlberger

Re: Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

TSM 5.1 is supported on Windows Me (which is technically a member of the Win9X family/architecture), but not Windows 95 and 98. Regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: AW: server-to-server copy-pools

Not exactly. Keep in mind that for target server the source one is just a node of type server. So it depends on domain settings source server node resides in to which primary pool virtual volumes go. And how many mount points you have there. Also you may want more than one mount points in copy

Re: management class question?

filespaces as a whole, aren't bound to a managmement class... I would check the include/exclude file and see how it is coded. Also remember, if you change the include/exclude list, that will apply it to all files previously backed up so the include/exclude list would be the place to look. an

Re: Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

remember, the general way the ~supported environment matrix~ works is client down one version.release from server client equal to server client ahead one version.release from server so the 4.1 client to a 5.1 server would place the whole environment so it falls outside the support matrix

TSM Encryption, Again :)

Hi everyone. For those who don't remember this discussion a few months ago here is some update. A few months ago we had a chance to offer TSM to one of the largest company here. Soon it became obvious that security where a large concern to them. They asked a lot of Encryption questions witch we

The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message

Hello all, This is my first time posting a question so please don't confuse my newbie frustration with my dire hopelessness. We ran Tivoli 3.7 Server on AIX before I came to this office. It was working fine till the crash and burn. The log files filled up and TSM stopped and couldn't be

Re: data tansfer time ???

Well, it took 1 hour 45 minutes to scan 12,987 files on that node. Only 29 changed and needed backing up. So, it took 47.07 seconds to backup up those 20 files which changed, but the bulk of the time was still the incremental checking of all your files to see if they had changed. Rob L. Jones

checking inclexcl syntax

Greetings, friends and comrades! Can you please help me confirm that I have my include/exclude list set up correctly? I am using TDP for Informix 4.1.3 with TSM API 4.2.2.1. My DBA's want to do 1 level0 backup on the weekend, and 1 level1 backup during the week. They want to keep a month's worth

Re: 5.1 Database Restore; External Library Manager

Did you issue a backup devconfig command from a admin session with your server ? ? ? I would think that would put all required info into the devconfig file... I have an admin schedule that performs that on a daily basis across all my tsm servers. try a rename of your devconfig and issue the

TDP for Domino not working

Hi all, I need some help with TDP for Domino on NT. Aparently all is working well but, when we execute domdsmc incremental * . the last message we can see is the following: Querying Domino for a list of databases, please wait... We wait for hours but the backup never

Re: The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message

Hi Pattie, Thanks for responding. I believe I did a full backup the first time and even did one just now with same errors. ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: BACKUP DB DEVCLASS=ULTRIUM1 TYPE=FULL SCRATCH=YES WAIT=NO 06/05/02 11:45:38 ANR0984I Process 115

Re: TDP for Domino not working

Rafael, Do you backup the databases to tape or disk? If tape, check to make sure the TSM server can mount a tape. Also, what does your dsm.opt look like? Any Excludes? Are you running the incremental from a script? If so, do you pipe the output to a log file or just leave it at the default

Re: management class question?

On 5 Jun 2002 at 11:18, David Longo replied, in part: select node_name,filespace_name,class_name from backups where node_name='NODE' and filespace_name='FSNAME'. You might want to change /class_name/distinct(class_name)/. But then, while there is a default (and perhaps other) management

Re: Can't do reclamation

You'll need to provide more information then that.. be a lot more specific. Specifically why can't you perform reclamation? Did you configure a reclamation pool? Is it a problem in the configuration of the reclamation pool? I recommend posting some details/output about the storage pool you're

Daily registry backup

Hi all, Does anyone know what is the daily registry backup? Thanks in advance for any comment. Rafael ___ Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!.

Re: The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message

First see that u have scratch volumes. Say dsmadmc q vol se that u have scratch file. Audit lib Say help for these cmds u will see results. -Original Message- From: Rob Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The old

Re: management class question?

select node_name,filespace_name,class_name from backups where node_name='NODE' and filespace_name='FSNAME'. Node has to be all UPPER CASE and filespace_name may be all UPPER or mixed depending on platform etc. This can give long display if lot of files in filespace, I think there is a SQL way

Re: The old SCRATCH TAPE NOT FOUND message

Rob, Based on your comments and log output it appears you have one or two problems. In your command (BACKUP DB dev=Ultrium1 type=INCREMENTAL scratch=YES wait=NO) you are specifying that the DB backup use a scratch tape. By specifying the use of a scratch tape the server must use a scratch

Re: Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

Thanks Andy for straightening me out on this... ;- Matt Adams Tivoli Storage Manager Team Hermitage Site Tech Deloitte Touche USA LLP 615.882.6861 -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

Hello, Have a win98 client machine that had a hard disk failure. It was running TSM 4.1, so I install the new disk, and OS, and then install Tsm 5.1... but when I try to restore with the 5.1 client, it restores about 10,000 files and then consistently throws a generic application error and dies!

TSM 4.2 server on Solaris 2.8

Anyone have any idea why a second instance of TSM server on Solaris will ignore HTTPORT setting in the dsmserv.opt file?

Re: Tsm client 5.1 fails to restore tsm 4.1 client backups ??

yeah... but your web site matrix is a little misleading. You might want to updated it http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/clients.html#intel Keith - Original Message - From: Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:29 AM

Re: Dump file backup for MS SQL server

I'm trying to back up only 4 dump files from MS SQL server through TSM 3.7. When the client scheduler started, there was an error message 'protocol violation...' I checked TCP/IP setting and it looked OK. My question: Did this happen because I didn't install TDP for MS SQL? We thought there

Re: Daily registry backup

In what context? Please explain more! -Original Message- From: Rafael Mendez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Daily registry backup Hi all, Does anyone know what is the daily registry backup? Thanks in advance for any

Re: TSM 4.2 server on Solaris 2.8

Dale, doublecheck the option spelling .. HTTPPORT Jolliff, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05-Jun-2002 15:39 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L cc: Subject:TSM 4.2

q libv showed 'private' STATUS but blank LAST_USE

TSM 4.1.4 running in AIX 4.3.3 After I came back from the Memorial weekend, I noticed a bunch of tapes with 'private' Status but blank Last_Use when I did a 'q libv'. 'q vol volume_name' on these tapes returned with 'NO MATCH'. There were problems with one of the tape drives over that weekend

Re: q libv showed 'private' STATUS but blank LAST_USE

If TSM tried to pull them from scratch to private to use in a pool, and the drive problem happened, then TSM will mark them as Private as to not use them as scratch again. If this is the case, you can just update them back to scratch - update libvol libraryname volumename stat=scratch for each

Re: TSM 5.1 and W2000

Yes, no problems seen, the upgrade works fine., make sure before upgrading that you make a full db backup and save some volhist en devconfig files. good luck Peter At 08:26 05-06-2002 -0500, you wrote: Has anyone upgraded to 5.1 from 4.1 on Windows 2000 platform? Any issues? Mark

USS Client under OS/390 V2R10

We upgraded to OS/390 V2R10 from V2R7 over the weekend and users are now unable to retrieve archives done by a schedule. It seems that OS/390 V2R7 allowed users the retrieve these files even though they were not the ones that did the archive. Under USS the node name remains constant, but the

TSM 4.2 possible IP problem

Does anyone know if the TSM server would have a problem with a client attempting to connect via an IP address with the last octet being 255? I have a server that will not talk to the TSM server, it has been rebuilt several times, I have tried several different client versions and still no luck.

Re: TSM 4.2 possible IP problem

Sean the octet 255 is broadcast address, not to be used. Two machine address octets never to use are 0 and 255. 0 is ok for network octets but don't use 255. Allan McNeill, Sean Sean_McNeill@JDED To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: management class question?

I already looked there sometimes people use the archive option: -archmc= and I don't know what management class they used from the server side. Thanks! --Justin Richard Bleistein Cook, Dwight ETo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Deleting a portion of a filespace

Hi All, Client version: 4.2.1.0 Client OS: Solaris 5.6 Server OS: Solaris 8 TSM Server Version: 4.2.1.15 We have a NFS mounted NetApp filer that retains their critical data. The data is is library with a number of different subdirectories for each project. They require we keep all data forever

Re: q libv showed 'private' STATUS but blank LAST_USE

Check the tape out and then back in with a status=scratch. On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Chuck Lam wrote: TSM 4.1.4 running in AIX 4.3.3 After I came back from the Memorial weekend, I noticed a bunch of tapes with 'private' Status but blank Last_Use when I did a 'q libv'. 'q vol volume_name' on

Re: data tansfer time ???

In a nutshell, this can be thought of as the total amount of time that TSM required to transfer the data across the network. In this case, it found 29 objects, that were 1.7GB in total size. To transfer that data accross the network took 47.07 seconds. At 08:37 AM 5/31/2002 -0400, you

Re: Can't do reclamation

Hi all, Thanks for all reply. Here is the details of the storage pool that can't perform reclamatoin. Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status

Re: data tansfer time ???

Not long ago, I have the same question about the definition of this term and here's the answer: Data Transfer Time - the total time it takes to send the total backup data from TSM client to TSM server over the network. *** My understanding of this definition is : client process will read

Re: Can't do reclamation

Hi Max, Is this all the volumes in this storage pool? At first glance it would seem that you have no scratch tapes available to perform reclamation with. Yours Truly, Eric -Original Message- From: Max Kwong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:41 PM To: