SERVER
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Tab Trepagnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cleanup backupgroups
The one thing I've missed in this discussion
See my reply inline.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:09:25AM -0400, Thierry ITTY wrote:
we have an automated tape library, something custom (a GRAU/ABBA-J with ibm
3590e drives and ca 1000 cartridges),
we backup/archieve ca 80 GB every day from our servers and workstations
over our lan
we
Hi
What kind of ATL you wish to use, is normally bound to your budget. But if
I could rank the tape libraries, I would do it in the following order:
1. StorageTek PowderHorn 9310 with 9840B fibre drives
This is probably the most powerful tape library on the market today. The
robotics are alot
On dinsdag, oktober 15, 2002, at 05:31 , Mark Stapleton wrote:
From: Dave Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've recently taken a look at the new TSM 5.1.5 client for Mac OS/Mac
OS X. Some serious issues still remain, and I'd like to know IBM's
official position on these issues:
What is the show command to see who has the log pinned? Is it in AIX server
5.1.1.6 level?
SHOW LOGPIN is not in v5.1.1.6. It was added back in on the newest
maintenance/patch - v5.1.5.1.
The command is:
show log pin
...and it works on 5.1.1.6 on AIX
Gretchen Thiele
Princeton
SHOW LOGPIN is not in v5.1.1.6. It was added back in on the newest
maintenance/patch - v5.1.5.1.
The command is:
show log pin
...and it works on 5.1.1.6 on AIX
But it's not the 'same' command. 'show log pin' is different from
'show logpin'. For example, on a v4.2.2.12 system (looks the same
Hello,
we are using trend micro server protect on our fileservers. During backup
(4.2.2.0 NT40-Client) the cpu-usage is nearly 100% and last on one Server 17h
instead of 2h without virus protection. OK, this is clear because tsm touches
every file, and the scanner scans it because its changed.
I've just put v5.1.5.1 into test and it looks like the SYSTEM OBJECT
problem (failure to expire the elements in the SYSTEM OBJECT filespace
for Win2K and WinXP) is back. Has anyone else seen this?
My test server: Solaris 2.8, TSM v5.1.5.1
Clients: WinXP, TSM v5.1.1.0 and Win2K, TSM v4.2.1.0
I
correction:
the command is tsm show log
whatever is placed after the 'log' is ignored.
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
-Original Message-
From: Steve Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 13:50
To:
Installer error. Thanks for letting me know, I will look to get this
straightened out ASAP.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to
Hello All,
I have a simple question. Is it possible to use a Quantum M2500 Tape
library with TSM 4.2? If so is there documentation on how to do this?
Thanks in advance.
Ray Baughman
Engineering Systems Administrator
TSM Administrator
National Machinery LLC
Phone 419-443-2257
Fax 419-443-2376
Hello TSM'ers,
I'm trying to find out my utlization of tapes per client
in order to calculate room for expansion next year.
Does anyone have a select command to fit?
FYI, I'm running TSM 4.2.1 on AIX 4.3.3
Regards,
Bassam
I'd be interested to hear if anyone out there is backing up a 2TB or bigger
Oracle DB from IBM Enterprise Storage Server (SHARK). We are likely to have
to backup such a beast in the near future and I'm wondering how we can
protect so much data. We will in all likelihood be backing up the
Just got word from Tivoli that APAR IC34462: BYTES FIELD IN SUMMARY TABLE SHOWS VALUE
0 IF THE BACKUP SESSION IS LOST AND WHEN REOPENED AGAIN is fixed in maintenance
level 4.2.3.0 and is now available.
Guillaume Gilbert
CGI Canada
Williams, Tim P {PBSG} [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on
Hey all,
I'm having difficulty planning a Solaris 2.8 exclude list - not sure what is
ignored by TSM and what needs to be excluded.
All suggestions welcome!
Regards,
Matthew
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
Hi TSMer's
Please help.I am running TSM 4.1 server on Windows 2000 and have an LTO
3583 library with two drives. We first installed the library with one drive
and it worked perfectly.we now have upgraded and added a 2nd drive and
are experiencing problems..the second drive will load
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/requirements.html shows all
supported devices. You can look for yours here.
Kelly J. Lipp
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax:
I have just installed 4.2 server with update to 4.2.2. I am having problems with help
not formatting
correctly for display in dsmadmc. Has anyone else seen this before and more
importantly
how can I fix this?
Jacque
We are just under 2TB with SAP. We are sitting on a shark. We are using 10
3590E1A drives attached to 2 San Data Gateways attached to 2 2109 S16
switches with 4 fibre adapters on the host. Our tsm server and database
server are the same server. We backup in around 7-8 hours for a full
backup.
:)
it is 'show logpin', and my 4.2.2.10 server understands this perfectly.
On dinsdag, oktober 15, 2002, at 02:53 , Large, Matthew wrote:
correction:
the command is tsm show log
whatever is placed after the 'log' is ignored.
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Eric, this may serve as a starting point for extrapolation --
We do 680 GB of SAP/R3 - Oracle in about 2 hours and 30 minutes. I'm NOT
using a SAN (yet).
The ESS is fiber-channel (3 fibers) to a 660-6M1; From there, we use four
sessions to four tape drives. Two sessions each over gigabit
Mike,
I have conducted testing with TSM and most the popular Antivirus Software.
Although I can't endorse a particular brand, I can say I had the most issues
with both Norton and Trend Micro's.
Sam.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Kindermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had enough issues with McAfee that we decided to switch to Norton.
Issues included:
Frequent Dr. Watsons
Viruses slipping through
If outbound file scanning was turned on, then when TSM backed up, it would
back up the changed files but 95% of the files on the fileserver had their
access time
I have been working with TSM for about a year now but have no experience
with archiving.
Recently I have been asked to look into archiving for long term storage of
our Exchange, SQL and Oracle database backups. We are currently using TDP
for our normally backup schedules and would like to
What exactly is the problem with the display output? What platform are
you on?
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My bad.
I am working on AIX 5.1
The problem is that when I ask for help within dsmadmc, I get a nonformatted
wordwrapped
output that is pretty incoherent.
Jacque
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue
Hi,
take a look at the installed language packages., there is your problem Had
the
same problem: make an smitty install_all_available software on the
packages.
This helped on aix 4.3.3 tsm-server 4.2.2.7.
Sorry, cant remember the name of the packages but you need the correct
versions.
Recently I have been asked to look into archiving for long term storage
of
our Exchange, SQL and Oracle database backups. We are currently using
TDP
for our normally backup schedules and would like to retain an
annual\monthly
copy of those databases.
I know this list has an overwhelming
I have a failed restore session that isn't going away on its own, and when I
try to cancel it, it says it is cancelling the session but it isn't getting
rid of it. I can't restart the restore because it says there is an active
restore in progress--which is the session that won't go away.
Is
cancel restore all
Rob Schroeder
Famous Footwear
608-827-3495 phone
608-662-6495 fax
Thach, Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OM cc:
Sent by: ADSM:
goto the client if it's unix and type in cancel restore then select the
number of the restore you want to cancel. Or you can just type in: q
restore from the server command line and cancel it from there otherwise
recycle dsmserv.
--Justin
Thach, Kevin
Hi All, we are running TSM 5.1.1. on a AIX 5.1.0.0 . Since the upgrade TSM has got a
lot pickier about condition codes from the client. What I have below is acondition
code of 8. Backup runs fine, but gives the code. Below, is part of a Dsmsched.log
file. What I want you to know is, there is
TSM Community,
I was able to obtain more detailed information regarding System Object Filespace
issue and the Cleanup Backupgroups utility, compliments of Tivoli.
4.2.3 was released 10/14/2002. This official PTF level resolves issues
with expiration of file groups which are typically used for
I keep seeing references to 4.2.3 being released yet I can't find
it..At least not for OS390 - z/OS based servers ???
Can someone tell me if they have found these updates ?
TAZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/2002 02:55 PM
Please respond to
Date: 15 October, 2002Time: 3:44 PM
From: Jerry Lawson, Specialist
The Hartford Insurance Group
860 547-2960
Beeper: Numeric: (860) 802-0364Messages: (800) 347-2574
Pin # 60088
A software bug in Windows XP or TSM? Seems like Windows XP is touching
those files therefore making TSM assume they have been modified in some
secret strange way. If that's the case, put them in the exclude list.
-
Tom Walker
-Original Message-
From: Lawson, Jerry W (ETSD, IT)
The following errors were reported in the activity log during a cleanup
backupgroup operation:
10/15/2002 16:09:26 ANRD imutil.c(8400): ThreadId23 Fetch Object.Ids
row
for member 0:4894474 failed, rc=43260504. Audit DB
required. CLEANUP
These files are part of the system object (the system files) that are backed
up EVERY TIME.
With the 5.1.5 client you can exclude the system object - before that you
could not do anything.
-Original Message-
From: Lawson, Jerry W (ETSD, IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 15,
Zoltan,
There will be a lag for MVS...usually 2 weeks.
Sam.
- Original Message -
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS SYSTEM OBJECT
I keep seeing references to 4.2.3 being
Well, that wasn't quite true. In earlier clients you could change the
domain statement to
domain C:
for instance and that would exclude the system object.
Kelly J. Lipp
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or
In addition to setting up a pool (or using an existing pool), the more
important thing is to set up an archive copy group with the desired
retention. The key here is that an archive is a distinctly different
function than backup. The stuff that is archived is managed per the archive
copy group.
Check the archives for SYSTEM OBJECTS -- that's what you're backing up; what
you can do about it depends on which client version you're running.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: Lawson, Jerry W (ETSD, IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:57
I have an interesting problem. One of my TSM servers is running on Win2K
Server. The server is connected to a Brocade FC switch and the FC switch is
connected to an FC-SCSI bridge. The library is an HP SureStore 6/60 with
DLT8000 drives. Every once in a while I get I/O error on a tape drive and
Yes, this is true. And, according to the Level 2 person involved with this
APAR 4.2.3 requires a upgradedb as a result. He thought for this fix.
Sorry, I was the one that opened the APAR. But, at least they may have
fixed it this time.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
Actually, show log is what is happening when you do show log pin. The
pin is just ignored.
I asked today for the APARs not included in 4.2.3.0 that were in previous
patch 4.2.2.13.
I think it is legitimate to ask what APARs or missing things are not in
5.1.5.1 that were in 5.1.1.6. Who wants
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Remco Post
So you're sugesting that while we are willing to pay as much for backing
up a Mac as for a PC, IBM doesn't have to put as much effort in building
a decent TSM client.
No, what I'm saying is that, given a finite
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Crawford, Lindy
Please help.I am running TSM 4.1 server on Windows 2000 and
have an LTO
3583 library with two drives. We first installed the library with
one drive
and it worked perfectly.we now have upgraded and
47 matches
Mail list logo
