Whats the Risk?

We may need to perform an Unload/Load/AUDITDB process against our TSM server. The problem is, I need a good estimate as to how long everything is going to take. The powers that be want a good estimate before I take the server down before any extended outage. What I was considering to determine

Re: Whats the Risk?

You are looking at about 6 hours per 1 million database pages with a good cushion of extra time. This has been the norm for my load/unloads. Also, there is no audit required if the load is successful. The load will correct any discrepencies if found. If you have a a 40GB database at 50% util you

Re: Whats the Risk?

Robert, The reason for the audit, is due to possible corruption in some objects. IBM has recommended the Unload/Load/Auditdb to correct these. Right now, we are have a way around the problem, but I will need to perform the audit eventually. Thanks for the information!! Michael Moore VF Services

Re: System Object won't rebind to new mgt class

The syntax for include is below. We only allow ALL right now, meaning all system objects are bound to the same mgmt class. include.systemobject ALL mgmtclass Regards deleting filespaces: 1) from the client - issue del fi, a list of filespaces are prompted and you can enter 1, 2, or whatever the

DEFAULT Policy Domain Retention Getting Assigned

We have a situation where the management class on many of our servers and in all our domains is showing up as DEFAULT in the BACKUPS table and during expireration it says it is using the DEFAULT; however, none of the rules associated with the assignment of the default policy domain backup

DB2 Backup using different node names

I want to backup DB2 trough ADSM. I have defined 2 different nodes, and I want to backup a DB2 database using both of them. I have defined 2 different option files for each of them, and I also have defined the DSMI_LOG, DSMI_CONFIG and DSMI_DIR environment variables. But when I launch the backup

Re: new version of the Atape and atldd driver

ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/AIX/ Note that the microcode in the drives sometimes needs updating regardless what the documentation says in order to work correctly. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon Inc. 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Ricardo

JBB support

I have some questions related to Journal Based Backups : - Is journaling supported in a MScluster environment with Geospan on EMC disks ? If so, which TSM client version is it ? - Is journaling supported on standalone nodes with TSM client AND TDPs (MSSQl, Exchange) installed ? - Is there

AW: AW: Group by problem for Storagereports

Thanks for that trick - it works for me. I made 6 new Domains - for each servercategory. My Result: tsm: ADSMselect cast(sum (filespaces.capacity/1024) as decimal(8,2)) as Instal led GB ,cast(sum(filespaces.capacity*pct_util/102400) as decimal(8,2)) as Used GB , domains.description from

64bit client on 32bit aix5l

hi *sm'ers, I'm asked to install a tsm client on a aix5L 32bit running server, due to the fact that one of our tsmservers runs adsm3.1 I have to use at last client level 4.2. As far as i see this is only available for aix 5L as a 64bit client. Doe anyone have a clue if there is a 32bit client

Re: Question about full Restores Part 2

Farren, while I cannot help with Solaris part, for the Windows part there is a redbook SG24-6141-00 Deploying the Tivoli Storage Manager Client in a Windows 2000 Environment Even it is rather old (for v4.1 client) suggestions and procedures there are very good. I used it with success (and even

Re: 64bit client on 32bit aix5l

32-bit client is for both AIX 4.3 and 5L. Thus you have to install packages with names ending on .aix43 Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Michelle Wiedeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.11.2002 10:59 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor

Re: Library Problem

Hi good people, We have tried the first option, deleted the library and the drives successfully. We left the device class. The problem now occurs when defining the drives, it says library is currently unavailable. I have even tried to define new devclass and library, but when it is time for the

Web admin interface problem ...

Hi *SM'ers I would like some advices on following problem, although I know most of you do not like this kind of interface ;-) I recently upgraded from TSM 4.2.1.15 to 4.2.3.0 using the Maintenance level found at

How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000

Hi *SM'ers, I would like some advices on following problem: How can I post an archive-command using an at-Job. My first idea was to use the cmd-interface and then an cd to the tsm-client-folder, but it doesnt work (ANS0101E.. unable to open Message repository). thanks Gerhard Gerhard

Re: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000

Why dont you use client scheduler and define a scheduled command from tsm server? //Henrik Heinrichs Gerhard

Re: Web admin interface problem ...

The correction is very simple - wait for a patch. This is described in numerous APARs. Bill Boyer reported IC34860 on 31.10. Visit http://www.tivoli.com/support/knowledgebase/ - Ask Tivoli and search for 252F will show up everything. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant PAC Brion Arnaud [EMAIL

Re: Poor Performance

Hello, up to my (non-expert) knowledge you can set tcp window size on various cisco devices. The default seems to be 4128, the command to change it is ip tcp window-size 0-65535 I never tried to change it ;) regards Juraj Salak Es gibt tatsächlich auf den Cisco Geräten einen Befehl der die

Re: Library Problem

actually you've tried the option 2a. From your post it seems that the actual problem is somewhere in option 1 (as I guessed) - there is something malfunctioning and library/changer device does not respond. Verify: - is the library in manual/off-line mode (receiving commands from panel and not

Re: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000

hi gerhard, you have to setup the necessary environment variables. like DSM_CONFIG=E:\TSM\dsm.opt DSM_DIR=E:\TSM\baclient\ DSM_LOG=E:\TSM\ and add the installation-directory to the PATH environment variable. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Uwe Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

TSM on W2K Cluster with TDP for SQL

HI All I'm having a problem with a scheduler for TDP for SQL v. 2.2.0.1, on a MS Cluster. I installed it several months ago, and it has been running good for all this time. Now I have a situation where the cluster resource for the scheduler service can't start the service. It tries 3 times, and

AW: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000

Thanks, it works. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Gerhard Heinrichs -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Uwe Schreiber [mailto:Uwe.Schreiber;DAIMLERCHRYSLER.COM] Gesendet am: Freitag, 15. November 2002 12:54 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in

Re: dsmcad scheduler and multiple tasks

could u give the sample script regards Raghu Thomas Denier Thomas.Denier@MAITo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L.TJU.EDUcc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Re: dsmcad scheduler and multiple

Re: Library Problem

There is nothing that has been updated or changed. The library is set to automatic. -Original Message- From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:acit;ATTGLOBAL.NET] Sent: 15 November 2002 12:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Library Problem actually you've tried the option 2a. From your

Linux Backup

Hello All, I am having an Issue with my Linux backup. Soon as I start the backup, it instantly completes. When I try to see the filesets backed up there are none. It appears as if the server does not recognise the linux filesystems. In the dsmsched.log there's a message indicating that there is

Re: Linux Backup

More details, please. Linux Version/Level/Kernel. What TSM client level ? Sounds like the problem with EXT3 file systems. Simplest answer is a higher level TSM client ! Nelson Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/2002 09:34 AM Please respond to

TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

We were running tsm 4.2.2.4 on an S7A AIX server. We were putting through approx 1.7 TB nightly with approx 85% going to disk storagepool and the remaining going direct to tape. We were also testing Lan-free with Gresham EDT-Distributape and STK acsls/9840 tape drives and we were consistently on

Re: moving ATL's

As long as the Library retains the same IP address in the ibmatl.conf file. If not, you will have to edit accordingly. --- Kai Hintze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, oh wiseness of *SM! We are about to move all my 3590 tapes from one ATL to another one. It looks to me like I can change

Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

Did you go to 64 bit mode when you went to 5.1.1.6? We have some clients that start out backing up at a good rate and then shift into a mode where they are running very very slow. We now think this might be a 64 bit mode server problem. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/02 09:20AM We were

Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

no we are still using 32 bit -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01;LOUISVILLE.EDU] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation Did you go to 64 bit mode when you went to 5.1.1.6?

Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

I am in the same predicament however I am in 64 bit mode both Aix and TSM. We have 2 network segments - The core segment where all app traffic is supposed to traverse (however we sneek backups in for litely populated servers) is exhibiting this performance degradation. The backup segment

Re: dsmcad scheduler and multiple tasks

One solution will be to have the TSM server kick off one and the OS to kick off the other one via crontab or any scheduler program... Allen Barth allen.barth@DB. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM cc:

Problems with 3583 Library

I am going nuts here. I have been having lots of problems with this library since day one. Two of the three drives were reporting I/O errors while reading the labels on tapes and TSM would mark those volumes as being unavailable. IBM sent a CE to replace the drives. But that didn't help. I am

Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

Hello, there is a known AIX TCP/IP problem that was recently discovered with AIX 5.1 64 bit. It is known as IY36925. It may cause severe performance degradation during TSM backups. At this time, you will have to call in for support to get an e-fix as the ptf is not yet available. Regards,

Re: Problems with 3583 Library

I am - I have a 3584 lib with fibre drives 4 drives are on fabric a and 4 drives on fabric b All drives on fabric a are working ok - Whenever I activate any of the drives on fabric b I get the same symptoms as u. Havent had a chance to really look at this tho Jose Rivera Ris Infrastructure

Re: Problems with 3583 Library

We had major problems starting out, but all is well now. Here's what happened: Errors on drives... replaced drives worked for a month Errors on drives... replaced drives (IBM said there were some bad drives out there) Replaced drives (again) and just about everything else as well. It turned out

Re: Linux Backup

I resolved the same problem by upgrading my TSM client to 5.1.1.0 -Original Message- From: Nelson Kane [mailto:TSMUser;AOL.COM] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linux Backup Hello All, I am having an Issue with my Linux backup. Soon as I start the

Apply Logs.

O.K. TSM server 4.2.1.9 running on OS/390 2.10. TSM client is 4.2.1.3 and TDP for Domino is 1.1. Domino is at 5.08. We are able to restore a data base with out error but when we attempt to apply the transaction logs we receive a message: Recovery Manager Log Scan in Progress:Try again later.

Re: Problems with 3583 Library

Check the version of the Atape and atldd driver, if you are on AIX... Anwer Adil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BIA.EDU cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Problems

Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation

Check your tcp_mssdflt settting. It sets the default packet size for non-local networks. It sounds like that's the situation you're in. The clients are sending packets in 1460, but you're sending them back out at 536. That's 3 times as many packets and acks for the same amount of data. We

Re: dsmcad scheduler and multiple tasks

Hi, Al. I've read some of the other suggestions, but I think the easiest way would be to create two command files. first.cmd start c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmc.exe inc [whatever] second.cmd start c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmc.exe inc [whatever] The start will cause the

new version of the Atape and atldd driver

Hello! I would like to know if somebody can answer me, what is the latest version of the Atape and atldd driver for AIX 4.3.3 and TSM 4.2? Also, where can I download the latest version? Thank you!

Re: new version of the Atape and atldd driver

Ricardo, Should be Atape 7.1.5.0 atldd 5.2.2.0 in index.storsys.ibm.com Good day, Hoa. -Original Message- From: Ricardo Ribeiro [mailto:ricardo.ribeiro;ADVANCEPCS.COM] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new version of the Atape and atldd driver

Re: Apply Logs.

Brian, This looks like a hung process to me. That message is obtained from the Domino Server when TDP for Domino makes a Domino Server API call that is failing. I can't tell what operating system your Domino Server is running on. (I see that your TSM Server is running on 390... but I wasn't

more on moving atl

AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2 I currently have a 3494 ATL that I share with the mainframe. 3 3590K drives are fibre attached to my aix. The ATL control is lan attached. They want to move my tape drives and all my tapes to a new ATL. As best I can tell if I just edit /etc/ibmatl.conf to use the new IP

Re: Apply Logs.

Sorry about that Del. We are running the TDP client on NT. I know that killing processes on this platform can have inconsistent results so I agree that we might need to recycle Domino server. Thanks for the information. Brian Del Hoobler [EMAIL

Re: more on moving atl

Of course it can't be quite that simple. move media doesn't like to work with tapes in Pending status. I guess that makes sense, the original reason for move media is to hold mountable tapes outside the library, and pending tapes aren't really mountable. I guess I will just check them out, then