I have seen this on the 4.2.x.x server code levels. What causes it to hang
is a storage pool related command by an ADMIN. If you do a q sesions, you
should find a admin that has been running for a long time. Cancel the admin
session and the problem will clear.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical
Eric,
try to specify full path to the BLOCK device, not to the character, i.e.
include.image /dev/lv0 mgclass
Maria Ilieva
- Original Message -
From: Eric LANGUILLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2 Backup image raw
Hi
I'm looking at setting up the famous DIRMC trick, with a primary sequential
pool on disk. I have a couple of questions:
1) Is it a requirement to have the recommended setup
DIRPOOL primary DISK: NEXTPOOL-DIRFILE
DIRFILE primary SEQUENTIAL on DISK
or can we have our DIRMC point straight to
Did anyone come across this issue, we have a scheduled back that starts
nat 6am, and usually ends by 9. I just logged on to check on other processes
and noticed that the schedule is still running but the byte count is not
changing:
Primary Pool UNIX_TAPEPOOL, Copy Pool DRM_TAPE_-
Great info,
I don't have any Perm hardware errors, but a lot of drive cleanup requests in
the error report. Unfortunately, the infamous reboot resolved the issue
again.
Thanks!
-kane
I registed a new client and I am unable q the server successfully. These are
the messages in my error log:
2/14/02 18:24:28 ANS1029E Communications have been dropped.
12/14/02 18:24:29 sessOpen: Error 137 from signon authentication.
12/14/02 18:24:29 sessOpen: Error 137 from signon
I killed the session that was running for a while, but still not go. I
bounced the server, and ofcourse, that did it. I'm not sure why this happened
though.
Thanks for your assistance.
-kane
I registed a new client and I am unable q the server successfully. These are
the messages in my error log:
12/14/02 18:24:28 ANS1029E Communications have been dropped.
That's a common error when one spends Saturday night registering clients...
My note in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says:
Does anybody have an idea what is reasonable to expect for the lifespan of a
3494 library?
Given the seemingly unlimited lifespan of the 3x9x cartridge form factor,
I should think that these libraries could outlast us all.