Urgent: Relocating Filegroupsfrom TDP for SQL into another databse on the same machine

2002-12-17 Thread Marc Layne
Hi All We wish to restore indiviudual filegroups from TDP for SQL from one database and relocate it into another one. Our environment: Win2k TSM server TSM 5.1.5.3 server TDP for SQL 2.2.1.0 MSSQL 2000 service pack 2 We are able to restore SQL files/groups to the same location via the gui but

Re: Can we cut out the me, toos (was Re: TSM Presentation)

2002-12-17 Thread Gerhard Rentschler
Hello, probably a change in the listserv config of this mailing list may help. Each mail I get from this list has the list as reply address. For replying to the sender you have to cut the mail address from the mail and do a forward. This is the case at least with Outlook. It might help a little

Re: preschedulecmd problem

2002-12-17 Thread Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand
Hi, I guess you could use different opt-files combined with different command-lines, where preschedulecmd is defined in opt-file. Rgds. Geirr -Original Message- From: Leif Gustafsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16. december 2002 16:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: preschedulecmd

Re: Urgent: Relocating Filegroupsfrom TDP for SQL into another databse on the same machine

2002-12-17 Thread Clarence Beukes
Partial restores are only available in SQL server 2000. It is only possible to do partial restores on full database backup objects. When performing a partial restore, the primary file group must always be restored, together with the other files you specify. When doing a partial restore on a new

Re: Can we cut out the me, toos (was Re: TSM Presentation)

2002-12-17 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
-- probably a change in the listserv config ... And with this patch you will solve the me too-problem at the cost of introducing new huge problem - replies will be not to the list but to the poster and discussions will be dead. Or we will have to change the address of replies (more than 10k/year)

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
Let's start from the beginning. How this came to your attention? Especially for all models. You missed at least one - IBM Announcement Letter No. ZG02-0381 dated June 11, 2002 (I track EMEA Letters, you ought to easily find U.S one). There you can find the following: Overview To address your need

TSM Journal Messages

2002-12-17 Thread Magura, Curtis
Client 5.1.1 Win NT4 SP6 Server 5.1.1.4 AIX 4.3.3 ML10 We are working through the error messages we are getting from the Journal service one at a time. Can't seem to find any information on this message at all. Anyone have a link to anything that would give more information on exactly what this

[Very OT] Re: Can we cut out the me, toos (was Re: TSM Presentation)

2002-12-17 Thread Remco Post
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:45:05 +0100 Gerhard Rentschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, probably a change in the listserv config of this mailing list may help. Each mail I get from this list has the list as reply address. For replying to the sender you have to cut the mail address from the mail

Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE

2002-12-17 Thread Amini, Mehdi
Hi All, I have a client NT 4 SP6 running TSM 5.1.5.4 When I login to this client immediately I get a Dr. Watson Error on DSMCSVC.EXE Access Violation (0Xc05) Address (0x004a5cb5)... This is the only client out of our 80 clients that I get this message. Any idea. Thanks Mehdi Amini

Re: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE

2002-12-17 Thread Burak Demircan
i also suffer from the same problem. any help appreciated ? regards Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE

2002-12-17 Thread Marc Lowers
Is the memory address shown in the Dr Watson report the same every time or does it vary? If they are the same it is probably bad memory. Marc. Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17-Dec-2002 12:25 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Talafous, John G.
The fact of the matter still remains that my IBM representative and an IBM business partner are telling me I have to move off of the 3466-C00 by April 15, 2003. Seems the rest of the 3466 community is in the dark on this as much as I am. This should pan out to be a real debacle. Perhaps the IBM

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Richard Sims
The fact of the matter still remains that my IBM representative and an IBM business partner are telling me I have to move off of the 3466-C00 by April 15, 2003. Seems the rest of the 3466 community is in the dark on this as much as I am. This should pan out to be a real debacle. A

w2k cluster and lanfree backup/restore

2002-12-17 Thread TSM
Hi , are there any known problems with backup/restore a w2k cluster over san (lanfree) and which is the easiest way to migrate an existing w2k cluster from backup over LAN to lanfree backup? we have two cluster nodes with 2 local disks each, and 4 managed cluster goups. ( 6 tsm nodes) how many

Re: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE

2002-12-17 Thread Mark Bertrand
I hate to give a standard answer, but do you have antivirus software installed. Could be a bad dat file. Mark B. -Original Message- From: Amini, Mehdi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE Hi All,

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Jolliff, Dale
The rumour I heard was that the NSM hardware/software support was going to be unbundled -- So after the upgrade to TSM 5.x, you are no longer forced to maintain NSM configuration compliance to conform with the NSM support scripts. I see this as a good thing, because that means that you can use

Re: tape length issues

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Simpson
At 20:44 -0500 12/16/02, Richard Sims wrote: There's a surprising amount of inconsistency as to the length of Ultrium tape, as reported by various vendors - despite the supposed industry standard. HP quotes 580 meters; others 609 or 610 meters (2000 feet). Yesterday, we had the opportunity to

Re: 3584 library loading

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Simpson
At 20:02 -0600 12/16/02, Mark Stapleton wrote: Try this sequence instead (for =10 tapes): I don't see why that sequence is an improvement over the one Matthew was complaining about. It requires the same number of actions (too many). It is true that in either sequence, you have sixty minutes to

Re: tape length issues

2002-12-17 Thread Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
Hi, same for us, using about 1500 Ultrium, we got 3 completely lost tapes (crumpled) and about 1 daily write error ! With Magstar, 1 error in last 4 years ! René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Talafous, John G.
IBM U.S. announcements: ItemDate Description 302-048 20020402 Modification: IBM Storage Machine Removal Program 102-165 20020611 IBM 3466 Model Conversions Enhance Flexibility 302-124 20020702 Modification: IBM Storage Machine Removal Program 302-216 20021105 Modification: IBM Storage

Tape management tool??

2002-12-17 Thread Roger Ward
Hi TSMers, I read this on the last daily notice. Life is easier with the 3494 and the OS/2's library/tape managment program. Is there a tape management system that helps manage Tivoli backups for AIX?? Thanks, Roger

Re: Tape management tool??

2002-12-17 Thread Pearson, Dave
If I understand you question right ... We use Tivoli Storage Management (TSM)... We have been using TSM for the last 7 or 8 years. David C. Pearson IS Production Support Analyst System Network Service Snohomish County PUD # 1 ole0.bmp Phone: 425.347.4420 Pager: 425.290.0944 FAX:

TDP for Domino

2002-12-17 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
On 3 of 10 TDP Domino backups I can see filespaces listed within TSM that belong to the C$ drive. See below. One of the 3 also shows the Platform as WINNT, yet the others report as TDP Domino NT. I'm not sure how to see the actual last time the filespace in question was backed up, since it doesn't

System Object

2002-12-17 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
Question: How did everyone actually see the System Object problem in some releases when everything I've seen always shows it at 0.0? ARISTOTLE SYSTEM 4 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 OBJECT Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support

Re: Mangled administrator commands

2002-12-17 Thread William F. Colwell
Tom, I have the same setup as you except the server is at 4.2.3.1. I saw the same thing, mangled commands; I am glad someone else saw it. I thought of opening a pmr, but didn't - it is too random and not really a big deal. Bill At 02:44 PM 12/16/2002, you wrote: I recently installed 5.1.5.0

Re: Performance pathology

2002-12-17 Thread John Naylor
Thomas, How long has your server been up since a halt of TSM. I am on OS390 TSM Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 and I find that it does get slower the longer I leave it between a recycle. So if its been a few weeks since your last, I would do that, as soon as you can. John Thomas Denier

Re: TDP for Domino

2002-12-17 Thread Del Hoobler
Geoff, Someone must have run a BA client backup using the same NODENAME. DP for Domino will only create and use 2 filespaces per Domino server: servername.DOMDBS servername.DOMLOGS As far as the platform field... the TSM Server will update the platform for all filespaces under that node

Re: TDP for Domino

2002-12-17 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
As far as the platform field... the TSM Server will update the platform for all filespaces under that node based upon the application that connected to it LAST. It looks like your dev02 box must still have a BA client backing up to it using the same NODENAME as DP for Domino. I wouldn't

Is there a tsm client that will run on a sequent box DYNIX/ptx(R) V4.4.4

2002-12-17 Thread Cook, Dwight E
I didn't see anything but I'm going blind in my old age... Is there any tsm client that will run on a Sequent box with DYNIX/ptx(R) V4.4.4 Dwight

Re: 3584 library loading

2002-12-17 Thread David Longo
I would also point out to the original issuer of this discussion that if having more than 10 tapes is a problem, you can upgrade to a 30 slot I/O station, just like on the 3494. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536

Idle system fails with Media mount not possible

2002-12-17 Thread Conko, Steven
strange one... and ive looked at everything i can think of. In client dsmerror.log: 12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tibco/logs/hawk/log/Hawk4.log' failed 12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible 12/17/02 15:01:57 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible

Re: 3584 library loading

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew Glanville
At 20:02 -0600 12/16/02, Mark Stapleton wrote: If you're loading 10 tapes: 1. Leisurely stroll to the library, open it up, place all tapes directly into empty slots into the library. Even easier--there's no request to reply to. Yeah, but it requires taking the library offline while the tapes are

Re: 3584 library loading

2002-12-17 Thread Richard Cowen
... Is that called a paradox or a conundrum? I would call that a Catch-22.

Re: Idle system fails with Media mount not possible

2002-12-17 Thread Todd Lundstedt
How strange.. I just went through something similar. Running on AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.1.7. What are you running? The short answer was to reboot the AIX operating system, and everything started working fine.. The long answer follows (well, not really an answer, just my situation, and what I tried to

Re: 3584 library loading

2002-12-17 Thread Dan Foster
Hot Diggety! Matthew Glanville was rumored to have written: But, I have found bulk loading tapes with the door open on the 3584 is a problem when tapes are in the drives. I had to figure out which slots NOT to put tapes into because those are the slots that the tapes in the drives use. When

Re: Idle system fails with Media mount not possible

2002-12-17 Thread Richard Sims
ANR0535W Transaction failed for session 1356 for node SY00113 (AIX) - insufficient mount points available to satisfy the request. There is NOTHING else running on this TSM server. All 6 drives are online. Nothing running can itself be an indication of things suspicious... It may be that TSM

Re: Idle system fails with Media mount not possible

2002-12-17 Thread David Longo
You didn't mention the Maint Level of AIX 4.3.3. If you have less than ML 10, then I would upgrade to that as one step. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17/02 05:15PM How strange.. I just went through something similar. Running on AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.1.7. What are you running? The short

managed services

2002-12-17 Thread Burak Demircan
hi, i use managed services to start my schedules. before using that method i was using standard schedule services and restart the service after changing dsm.opt file what can i do to change dsm.opt and apply new changes to my schedules if i am using Acceptor service? Should i restart