Re: Windows 2000 - not backing up all drives

2003-04-04 Thread Chandrasekhar, C.R
Brenda, Did you check your dsm.opt file on that particular client for DOMAIN options and check for client option set (q cloptset). thanks, C.R.Chandrasekhar. Systems Executive. Tivoli Certified Consultant (TSM). TIMKEN Engineering Research - INDIA (P) Ltd., Bangalore. Phone No: 91-80-5536113

Re: upgrade TDP for R3

2003-04-04 Thread Seay, Paul
Works very well. There is a memory assertion error that may not be fixed in this level, but that problem has always been there. -Original Message- From: Dale Gieseke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: upgrade TDP for R3

Re: TSM Server not using maximum number of drives.

2003-04-04 Thread Seay, Paul
Collocation can also cause fewer tape drives to be used. -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM Server not using maximum number of drives. The Resource Utilization parameter in your

Re: TDP, TSM-API OS/400

2003-04-04 Thread Del Hoobler
Patrick, In order to back up your Domino server using Data Protection for Domino you must have access to a TSM Server. DP for Domino will read data from the Domino Server database files, and send it to the TSM Server via the TSM API. Your statement: I know I will not be able to backup the

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Brian L. Nick
Not exactly. We are currently running TSM 4.2.1.9 on a 9672-R44 running OS/390 2.10 and we have been doing an evaluation on moving TSM from OS/390 on to AIX. While the cost of the AIX hardware is relatively cheap we still need to incur DASD costs in the form of SAN and Tape costs, not to mention

Re: Exchange 2000 and TSM's TDP for Exchange

2003-04-04 Thread Del Hoobler
Tony, 1.) Backup up the users individual mailbox (brick level) directly to a PST file, so that I do not have to have a hot spare and so that I do NOT have to use Exmerge. [if this is true, then all I would need to do is make the PST available for the user to import into Outlook and they could

Re: server onto another server

2003-04-04 Thread Jeff G Kloek
Are your storage pools, db volumes and log volumes on internal or external disk? I ask because if you're moving that disk to the new host, it can be much easier. I did this on 3/29, moving from an IBM RS6000 S7A to a P670, and it went very smoothly. Let me know and I'll post the steps and times I

Server-Free Backup is it for real or is it just a Hype

2003-04-04 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
Hi Guys. I want to start a discussion on Server-Free Backup. Server-Free backup is to bee the holy grail in SAN backup. Server free backup is just when you tell something on the san backup these files, and it will copy disk to disk or disk to tape or what ever you want. This will make use of the

offsite tape pools

2003-04-04 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone! I have a question about offsite tape pools. Is there any way to consolidate clients data onto a minimum number of tapes without doing collocation on the offsite copy pool? I have an NT domain with 1 onsite and 1 offsite tape pool. When we go to disaster recovery their restores

Re: End Of Support V4.2

2003-04-04 Thread Ochs, Duane
Very well put and 100% true. But just remember, if you are in the middle of a necessary recovery and you are having serious difficulties whether it is unforeseen issues or self imposed ones, you may be completely reliant on adsm.org as your only resource to turn to. Everything ran fine for quite

Re: End Of Support V4.2

2003-04-04 Thread Murray, Jim
I agree with this. I have a couple of databases that I keep upgrading to the latest version of SQL server and thus the latest version of TDP for backup and these databases haven't been used in 2 years, but for regulations I have to keep them for 5 more years. If I archive them off who's to say

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS)
Brian, In my situation, I'm getting charged for MIPS usage on the mainframe as well as staff employees that support the mainframe. The tape issue turns out to be a wash for us since we'd use the same tape libs. DASD you're paying for in either case. We did the same exact eval that you're

TSM User Group for Baltimore/WashingtonDC/NorthernVirginia meets April 30

2003-04-04 Thread Prather, Wanda
You are invited to join us for the next meeting of TSMUG, the Baltimore/WashingtonDC/Northern Virginia TSM user's group -- Date:April 30, 2003 Time:8:30 am - 1 pm Location:Computer Applications Specialists (CAS) 6201 Chevy Chase Drive Laurel MD 20707

Re: TSM User Group for Baltimore/WashingtonDC/NorthernVirginia meets April 30

2003-04-04 Thread Tommy Templeton
I would come if I lived closer ;-) But, I am excited to be going to the IBM Developer Works Conference next week in New Orleans. Lots of Planet Tivoli sessions there. see ya, Tommy - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04,

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Brian L. Nick
Joe, We are in a much different situation. Staffing required for TSM server support of 200 clients 1, staffing for mainframe tape and dasd support 1. Actually it's just me. We are only backing up about 300gb a night but we have tuned our system to accommodate TSM and control the CPU that is

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Sam Sheppard
Top of message -- 04-04-03 09:12 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: TSM on Mainframe I have a similar situation as Brian. 250 clients, running 4.2.3.2 servers on both a 9672-R52 and 9672-R14 which will be replaced with a z/800 0C1 in the next

How many copies in copypool?

2003-04-04 Thread Kai Hintze
Greetings oh wise and varied *SM'ers! I have an internals question. I have a primary disk pool BACKUP_DISK, with a collocated primary tape pool BACKUP_TAPE that BACKUP_DISK spools to when it gets full (or at 16:30, whichever comes first :). I have enough disk that I seldom need to migrate data

What kind of label?

2003-04-04 Thread Fred Johanson
Can anyone tell me quickly what kind of label is written by the command label libv library volume devt=3590 checkin=scr for a 3494 library??

Re: How many copies in copypool?

2003-04-04 Thread Miller, Ryan
TSM will recognize which, if any, of your data is different and backup only the different data, it won't make a second copy. Ryan Miller Principal Financial Group Tivoli Certified Consultant Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1 -Original Message- From: Kai Hintze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Joni Moyer
I am running TSM 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 I am getting calls from clients about slow backups, restores,etc. on TSM. I went out and looked and there are 100 sessions going for different clients, but they aren't ending. Some are in the IDLEW status, but a majority of them are in the run status.

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Kai Hintze
How are your disk pools? Full or still have room? What is your tape status? Do you have other communications problems? (Slow printing, slow terminals, slow FTP...) -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 04 April 2003 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM 6205 SCSI Card and LTO-1

2003-04-04 Thread Marc D. Taylor
Hello All, We are running an F50, AIX 4330-ML11 with ITSM 5.1.5.4 with scsi LTO-1 drives and library. The drives and library are connected using a couple of FC 6205 Ultra2 SCSI cards. Questions: Are the default (what AIX chooses after installing the card) settings for this card okay?

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Joni Moyer
Disk pools aren't full. Tape drives are available. There are plenty of tapes. The db is 88% full. Recovery log is 7% utilized. I did have the following message, but it said the server would continue: ANR0390W A server database deadlock situation has been encountered: lock request for

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Brian L. Nick
Joni, I had this happen on TSM 4.2.1.9 a long time ago, my only option was to bounce the TSM server. I did not have as many clients active only 10 or so. Sorry but that was my quickest fix at that time. No other way to free these sessions up that I know of. - Brian Brian L. Nick Systems

AW: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Salak Juraj
quick ideas: Maybe your primary storage pool is full and the sessions are in MediaWait state? look at Q ACTL on server and dsmsched.log and dsmerror.log on clients Juraj -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 04. April 2003 21:13 An:

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Vraspir, Mary J.
I have seen a deadlock situation when trying to delete objects on the same FS. Are any of your sessions trying to backup the same fs names/files? Have you tried killing off the sessions? Is 100 client sessions at one time common? Are there any helpful messages in the individual client's

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread David E Ehresman
If you want support to look at the problem, take a svc dump. Then cycle your tsm server to clear the deadlock. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/03 02:22PM Disk pools aren't full. Tape drives are available. There are plenty of tapes. The db is 88% full. Recovery log is 7% utilized. I did

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Miller, Ryan
Joni, I had left you a v-mail, thought you would like a quick response. We also run OS/390 r2.10, and have several TSM servers. When we were still on 4.1 code we had this happen frequently. IBM was never able to find a cause or solution. However, when we upgraded to 4.2 and now 5.1 the

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Shannon Bach
And the days of IPL'ing frequently are long gone for us. We seldom IPL and then it only for an hour or so. TSM just takes right up where it left off. Shannon Bach Madison Gas Electric Co. Operations Analyst - Data Center Services Office 608-252-7260 Fax 608-252-7098 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TSM on Mainframe

2003-04-04 Thread Wayne T. Smith
Though I'm not advocating someone install TSM or TSM on a mainframe, I'll offer that we don't IPL our mainframe very often. Here's the output of a command I just entered ... q cplevel VM/ESA Version 2 Release 3.0, service level 9803 Generated at 07/09/98 12:19:20 EST IPL at 03/18/01 07:17:35 EST

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Neil Schofield
Joni If you have any processes using server-to-server communications running concurrently with the backups, try cancelling the processes. This in itself will probably not free things up but if you then try cancel all the sessions created by the server-to-server communications, things may resume.

Re: HELP!!! EMERGENCY!!!

2003-04-04 Thread Sias Dealy
Joni, I have this happen with TSM 4.1.5 on AIX. You may or may not like the answer. Stop and restart the TSM server. This is the only way to clear up the sessions. Sias Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more

Re: Defining TSM Disk pools on ESS wisdom wanted

2003-04-04 Thread Seay, Paul
Ever tried maxpgahead? That is why you want JFS. Causes things to fly. -Original Message- From: Emil S. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Defining TSM Disk pools on ESS wisdom wanted On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at

Linux kernel for Redhat

2003-04-04 Thread Levinson, Donald A.
Does anyone know where to get the kernel-2.4.9-31.i386.rpm for redhat 7.2? All the sites I have checked only have the much newer kernels and associated dependencies. I even checked the source rpm's and the oldest I could get was 2.4.9-34. Has IBM said anything about releasing newer tape drivers?

Small TSM deployment

2003-04-04 Thread Levinson, Donald A.
has anyone deployed TSM from a B50 or a 43p 140 ? I need to back up about 4 GB a night on a local network from 2 clients and maintain a total tape pool of about 2.5 TB on about 100,000 objects or less. thank you for any assistance or guidance. Don Levinson This transmittal may contain