Brenda,
Did you check your dsm.opt file on that particular client for DOMAIN options
and check for client option set (q cloptset).
thanks,
C.R.Chandrasekhar.
Systems Executive.
Tivoli Certified Consultant (TSM).
TIMKEN Engineering Research - INDIA (P) Ltd., Bangalore.
Phone No: 91-80-5536113
Works very well. There is a memory assertion error that may not be fixed in
this level, but that problem has always been there.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Gieseke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upgrade TDP for R3
Collocation can also cause fewer tape drives to be used.
-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Server not using maximum number of drives.
The Resource Utilization parameter in your
Patrick,
In order to back up your Domino server using Data Protection
for Domino you must have access to a TSM Server.
DP for Domino will read data from the Domino Server
database files, and send it to the TSM Server via the TSM API.
Your statement:
I know I will not be able to backup the
Not exactly. We are currently running TSM 4.2.1.9 on a 9672-R44 running
OS/390 2.10 and we have been doing an evaluation on moving TSM from OS/390
on to AIX. While the cost of the AIX hardware is relatively cheap we still
need to incur DASD costs in the form of SAN and Tape costs, not to mention
Tony,
1.) Backup up the users individual mailbox (brick level) directly to a
PST
file, so that I do not have to have a hot spare and so that I do NOT have
to
use Exmerge. [if this is true, then all I would need to do is make the
PST
available for the user to import into Outlook and they could
Are your storage pools, db volumes and log volumes on internal or external
disk?
I ask because if you're moving that disk to the new host, it can be much
easier.
I did this on 3/29, moving from an IBM RS6000 S7A to a P670, and it went
very smoothly.
Let me know and I'll post the steps and times I
Hi Guys.
I want to start a discussion on Server-Free Backup.
Server-Free backup is to bee the holy grail in SAN backup. Server free
backup is just when you tell something on the san backup these files, and it
will copy disk to disk or disk to tape or what ever you want. This will make
use of the
Hello everyone!
I have a question about offsite tape pools. Is there any way to
consolidate clients data onto a minimum number of tapes without doing
collocation on the offsite copy pool? I have an NT domain with 1 onsite
and 1 offsite tape pool. When we go to disaster recovery their restores
Very well put and 100% true.
But just remember, if you are in the middle of a necessary recovery and you
are having serious difficulties whether it is unforeseen issues or self
imposed ones, you may be completely reliant on adsm.org as your only
resource to turn to. Everything ran fine for quite
I agree with this. I have a couple of databases that I keep upgrading to
the latest version of SQL server and thus the latest version of TDP for
backup and these databases haven't been used in 2 years, but for regulations
I have to keep them for 5 more years. If I archive them off who's to say
Brian,
In my situation, I'm getting charged for MIPS usage on the mainframe as well as staff
employees that support the mainframe. The tape issue turns out to be a wash for us
since we'd use the same tape
libs. DASD you're paying for in either case.
We did the same exact eval that you're
You are invited to join us for the next meeting of TSMUG, the
Baltimore/WashingtonDC/Northern Virginia TSM user's group --
Date:April 30, 2003
Time:8:30 am - 1 pm
Location:Computer Applications Specialists (CAS)
6201 Chevy Chase Drive
Laurel MD 20707
I would come if I lived closer ;-)
But, I am excited to be going to the IBM Developer Works Conference next
week in New Orleans. Lots of Planet Tivoli sessions there.
see ya,
Tommy
- Original Message -
From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04,
Joe,
We are in a much different situation. Staffing required for TSM server
support of 200 clients 1, staffing for mainframe tape and dasd support 1.
Actually it's just me. We are only backing up about 300gb a night but we
have tuned our system to accommodate TSM and control the CPU that is
Top of message
-- 04-04-03 09:12 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: TSM on Mainframe
I have a similar situation as Brian. 250 clients, running 4.2.3.2
servers on both a 9672-R52 and 9672-R14 which will be replaced with a
z/800 0C1 in the next
Greetings oh wise and varied *SM'ers!
I have an internals question.
I have a primary disk pool BACKUP_DISK, with a collocated primary tape pool
BACKUP_TAPE that BACKUP_DISK spools to when it gets full (or at 16:30,
whichever comes first :). I have enough disk that I seldom need to migrate
data
Can anyone tell me quickly what kind of label is written by the command
label libv library volume devt=3590 checkin=scr
for a 3494 library??
TSM will recognize which, if any, of your data is different and backup only the
different data, it won't make a second copy.
Ryan Miller
Principal Financial Group
Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1
-Original Message-
From: Kai Hintze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running TSM 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10
I am getting calls from clients about slow backups, restores,etc. on TSM.
I went out and looked and there are 100 sessions going for different
clients, but they aren't ending. Some are in the IDLEW status, but a
majority of them are in the run status.
How are your disk pools? Full or still have room?
What is your tape status?
Do you have other communications problems? (Slow printing, slow terminals,
slow FTP...)
-Original Message-
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 04 April 2003 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
We are running an F50, AIX 4330-ML11 with ITSM 5.1.5.4 with scsi LTO-1
drives and library.
The drives and library are connected using a couple of FC 6205 Ultra2 SCSI
cards.
Questions: Are the default (what AIX chooses after installing the card)
settings for this card okay?
Disk pools aren't full. Tape drives are available. There are plenty of
tapes. The db is 88% full. Recovery log is 7% utilized. I did have the
following message, but it said the server would continue:
ANR0390W A server database deadlock situation has been encountered: lock
request for
Joni,
I had this happen on TSM 4.2.1.9 a long time ago, my only option was to
bounce the TSM server. I did not have as many clients active only 10 or so.
Sorry but that was my quickest fix at that time. No other way to free these
sessions up that I know of.
- Brian
Brian L. Nick
Systems
quick ideas:
Maybe your primary storage pool is full and the sessions are in MediaWait
state?
look at Q ACTL on server and
dsmsched.log and
dsmerror.log on clients
Juraj
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. April 2003 21:13
An:
I have seen a deadlock situation when trying to delete objects on the same FS. Are
any of your sessions trying to backup the same fs names/files?
Have you tried killing off the sessions? Is 100 client sessions at one time common?
Are there any helpful messages in the individual client's
If you want support to look at the problem, take a svc dump. Then cycle
your tsm server to clear the deadlock.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/03 02:22PM
Disk pools aren't full. Tape drives are available. There are plenty
of
tapes. The db is 88% full. Recovery log is 7% utilized. I did
Joni, I had left you a v-mail, thought you would like a quick response. We also run
OS/390 r2.10, and have several TSM servers. When we were still on 4.1 code we had
this happen frequently. IBM was never able to find a cause or solution. However, when
we upgraded to 4.2 and now 5.1 the
And the days of IPL'ing frequently are long gone for us. We seldom IPL
and then it only for an hour or so. TSM just takes right up where it left
off.
Shannon Bach
Madison Gas Electric Co.
Operations Analyst - Data Center Services
Office 608-252-7260
Fax 608-252-7098
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Though I'm not advocating someone install TSM or TSM on a mainframe,
I'll offer that we don't IPL our mainframe very often. Here's the
output of a command I just entered ...
q cplevel
VM/ESA Version 2 Release 3.0, service level 9803
Generated at 07/09/98 12:19:20 EST
IPL at 03/18/01 07:17:35 EST
Joni
If you have any processes using server-to-server communications running
concurrently with the backups, try cancelling the processes. This in itself
will probably not free things up but if you then try cancel all the
sessions created by the server-to-server communications, things may resume.
Joni,
I have this happen with TSM 4.1.5 on AIX.
You may or may not like the answer.
Stop and restart the TSM server.
This is the only way to clear up the sessions.
Sias
Get your own 800 number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
Ever tried maxpgahead? That is why you want JFS. Causes things to fly.
-Original Message-
From: Emil S. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Defining TSM Disk pools on ESS wisdom wanted
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at
Does anyone know where to get the kernel-2.4.9-31.i386.rpm for redhat 7.2?
All the sites I have checked only have the much newer kernels and associated
dependencies.
I even checked the source rpm's and the oldest I could get was 2.4.9-34.
Has IBM said anything about releasing newer tape drivers?
has anyone deployed TSM from a B50 or a 43p 140 ?
I need to back up about 4 GB a night on a local network from 2 clients and
maintain a total tape pool of about 2.5 TB on about 100,000 objects or less.
thank you for any assistance or guidance.
Don Levinson
This transmittal may contain
35 matches
Mail list logo