collocated storage pool issue

Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty

Error backuping Certificate Server Database on win2k client

Hi list, W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v 5.00.2195 SP 3) using a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup consistently finishes with status failed, and following message can be found in dsmerror.log : 07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while

Re: collocated storage pool issue

Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30

Re: q drive = status unknown

Thanks Kenny, that did it. Still trying to figure out what caused it. -Original Message- From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown You might want to check the defined path as well. They

Re: q drive = status unknown

I was having this problem with IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an IBM 3583 library until I upgraded the firmware for the drives and the library itself. And the RMU for good measure. I didn't find out what the original problem was. Regards, Steve Rivers -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand

Re: q drive = status unknown

Mark, We had a similar issue with our W2K Library clients. The way around it is to either reboot the server or use NTUTIL to close the drives. the issue is a scsi reserve has been set on these drives therefore now they are back online they have the reserve still in place which will not

Antwort: Exclude issue

Hi, try exclude.dir *:\documents* Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Markus Veit

SV: Tivoli and GWTSA.NLM

Hi Lee I have been asking the same question, and here what's come up: There is no roadmap since we have no plans at this time to implement this. I would recommend that you or any other customers interested in TSM support for Novell GroupWise (or for any new feature, for that matter) open a

Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?

Hi all I've been restoring some data on a NetWare Cluster... and I have had several problems doing this: The TSM Server is a 5.1.6.2 on a AIX 4.3.3. Client software, NetWare 6, SP3 and TSM Client 5.1.6.0. Problem: Every time I tried to start a restore on the cluster, the following happened: -

Re: Error backuping Certificate Server Database on win2k client

W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v 5.00.2195 SP 3) using a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup consistently finishes with status failed, and following message can be found in dsmerror.log : 07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while processing

Re: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?

... On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node NODENAME (NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds. ... Sounds like your server COMMTimeout value is unrealistically low for major client operations. Richard Sims, BU

SV: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?

Hi Richard Note that the problem only occurs while restoring a NetWare Cluster!!! And in a situation in which there are no processes occuring... the restores works fine... So I don't believe it has anything to do with the COMMTimeout... in that case the problem should be more persistent!

Re: TSM SYSBACK

Yes, you can convert-- they migrate it to the Passport Advantage program (which has it's own section just to migrate folks) and you provide them with the number of processors that you had it running on when it was sold as a services offering, and then they whip up an offer on maintenance of

lan-free tape dismount retention

Hello! I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount retention set to minutes, but as you can see below the volumes is being dismounted seconds after the archive session to the tape drive has completed for the storage agent. Is there a parameter that must be set on the storage

RES: lan-free tape dismount retention

Hi Joni, You it restarted the TSM Server after modifying the Mount Retention (min): 9,999? Att, Elenara -Mensagem original- De: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 10:08 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: lan-free tape dismount retention

Re: collocated storage pool issue

I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however

Re: collocated storage pool issue

Hi, Issue a q vol volumename and see if the output has Scratch Volume?: Yes in it. If this is set to NO the volume remains in the storage pool it was defined to. If it is set to YES, you have to do an audit vol volumename fix=yes. Regard. Karel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jacques

checkin of volume

Here is a new one. The system had problems mounting volume 000551. -I reset it offsite -took it out of the library ( it said it wasn't present in the lib when i tried doing a checkout) -tried checking it in and got: 07/16/03 09:40:17 ANR8422I CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Operation for library IBM3494A

Re: collocated storage pool issue

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still

RMAN-06003

Hi, I want to do a restore procedure of a database Oracle 8i runnig over Sun Solaris. I tried to restore this database in other server that have a different file system ( AIX 4.3.3 ) and I had the following message error: RMAN alter database mount; RMAN-03022: compiling command: alter db

Open file support

Hi all, a collegue just installed the TSM 5.2 client and required add-ons to be able to properly back-up open files. After some fooling around with the settings, we still got no further than: 07/16/2003 16:30:24 ANS1327E The snapshot operation for 'C:\*' failed. Error code: 673. 07/16/2003

Re: collocated storage pool issue

Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July

Re: collocated storage pool issue

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200 Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Re: Exclude issue

The '?' character matches exactly one character. Examples of matches for your *:\documents? pattern: c:\documents1 f:\documents$ Examples that do NOT match: c:\Documents and Settings t:\documents If you are interested in excluding all directories whose names begin with documents,

Re: collocated storage pool issue

Hi Remco! You are right, but aren't empty volumes always in a pending or scratch state? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated

Re: TDP Oracle config question

Steve, Can you answer me this? Does your backup actually fail, or is this just something that shows up during a successful backup? The /adsmorc filespace is a TSM Server filespace and is the default for TDP Oracle and will get created during the backup, if it doesn't already exist. Unless of

Re: TDP Oracle config question

Neil, Im still waiting to find out from the DBA running it if he thinks it is succeeding or failing. Right now we dont have TDPO_FS defined so it is defaulting to adsmorc. My question is: is this only a filespace created within TSM Server storage or does there need to be an actual

Help Q auditocc or other query

The information in q auditocc tells me a lot but I wonder if there is a way to get the same information and order it by megabytes/gigabytes/terabytes from the heaviest hitter to the least. I would also like to have a column that includes the number of files each of the nodes TSM is tracking. This

Re: Help Q auditocc or other query

select * from auditocc order by total_mb asc ;-) Gill, Geoffrey L. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GEOFFREY.L.GILL@cc: SAIC.COMSubject: Help Q auditocc or other

Re: Help Q auditocc or other query

sorry, one of these days I'll learn to read... here is more along the lines of what you are looking for... (not much data here because this is the test serve tsm: TSMSRV08select auditocc.node_name,auditocc.total_mb,sum(occupancy.num_files) as file_cnt from auditocc,occupancy where

? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??

Hello all, I am working with a some Oracle people to define a backup solution. I suggested using the Oracle TDP for doing HOT backups. They said that the TDP does nothing for them because they do NOT use RMAN. They write their own scripts to freeze/release the table spaces and do

Re: ? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??

Yes, Same reason our DBAs did not want to use it. They didn't want to deal with learning RMAN. SQL-BACKTRACK apparantly generates the RMAN scripts and so we use that. But there, they claim they need full backups because thuer is no difference in size/ length of time between an incrmental and a

Re: TDP Oracle config question

You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular

Re: collocated storage pool issue

Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the time it's defined in a stgpool until the time of the first file write commit onto that volume.

Re: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION

Elenara, It actually looks like you're selecting from the backups table here. When you do your restore, try displaying active and inactive versions (green diamond button, or view menu). That should show the file. If not, please describe more closely exactly what you do when you attempt the

RES: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION

Thank you Alex, My problem was solved yesterday by our friend Andrew Raibeck. Att, Elenara -Mensagem original- De: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 15:46 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION Elenara,

backup of volhist and devconfig files

I am currently trying to backup devconfig and volhist to a networked drive under windows Here is the command I use Backup volhist filenames=f:\test\volhist.out Backup devconfig filenames=f:\test\devonfig.out I always get the error ANR2391E BACKUP DEVCONFIG: Server could not write device

Fw: ? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??

That's correct! It's true that work with RMAN is a little bit hard, but if use LTO2 you will see the advantage of using TDP for Oracle. There's no disk subsystem so fast as LTO2. Those drive units can transfer at 70MB/s compressed. So to utilize the LTO2 drives with it's full capacity you have

Re: TDP Oracle config question

Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this

Re: TDP Oracle config question

No idea about the missing -. I believe the long name is built by Oracle/RMAN and not TSM. So need to look there. I don't know how that is put together, need to get with your DBA or Oracle on that. (I just looked at mine and all my RMAN backups use _ as separators and have different numbering

Re: backup of volhist and devconfig files

Have you checked the access permissions to F: ? Doug Thorneycroft County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058 FAX (562) 699-6756 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tae Kim Sent:

Re: TDP Oracle config question

Thanks again. One more quick question... does the filespace name, such as /adsmorc need to be included in the include/exclude list as the docs state? I suppose if so it would be on the TDP client? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16,

Re: lan-free tape dismount retention

in dsmserv.opt of Library Client: SHAREDLIBIDLE YES -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lan-free tape dismount retention Hello! I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount

Re: TDP Oracle config question

We use it here, well sort of. We have a separate node name for the RMAN backups on each client, that is one node name for B/A on this machine and a separate node name for the RMAN/TDPO client. Therefore we have two stanzas each in dsm.sys and dsm.opt and have separate backup.excl files. For the

Version 4.1.0.0 to 5.x. upgrade procedure ?

Hi, I need a little help to upgrade the TSM Server from version 4.1.0.0 to 5.x. So far I installed a test server running a 4.1.0.0 a I am following the steps of Quick Start book (TSM 5.1 for Windows pag. 31) but the DB was not upgraded. What is the exactly procedure ? I´m running W2K. Thanks

Re: backup of volhist and devconfig files

If I remember correctly the TSM service process, which runs under a service context has no visability to networked drives. This is a Microsoft issue (I've had that problem with other products being run as a service). Drives are networked and visable in a user context. To demonstrate, if you stop