Hot Diggety! Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC was rumored to have written:
Eric, following some unmount failures, IBM recommended to install 36U3 (36U5
was chosen because it appeared on the IBM ftp site the day before).
I noticed that several people installed 36U5 but it does not appear to be
on
Estarei ausente do escritório a partir de 01/09/2003 e não retornarei até
05/09/2003.
Assuntos relacionados a Administração de Rede e TSM, favor entrar em
contato com Marcos Nava ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello,
I wanted and tried to move a nodes data to a different storagepool,
non-collocated to collocated.
From dlt-standard with copypool to dlt-monthly with copypool-monthly.
(move nodedata xxx from=dlt-standard to=dlt-monthly)
Move within primarypools went ok and I thought that admin schedules
Dan,
I really mean 36U5, please find here output of Service panel from the web
interface for the drives:
whtm_service_drive_vpd.pdf
This version of firmware has been downloaded by the IBM CE
Regards,
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global
Abdulaziz,
Take a look at the IBM knowledge base for IBM TSM for Mail.
(The knowledge base is getting filled with more articles every day.)
Here is the direct URL for IBM TSM for Mail:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManagerforMail.html
Put the word
Hi TSMers
Here's a quick question for you. I have some tape volumes in our 3494 tape
library that contain data for clients that no longer exist. I want to
remove these tape volumes from our library to free up some space, but keep
the volumes just in case.
Now, the problem is that I no longer
Hey Farren,
Yes, it should be as simple as marking the volumes as UNAVAILABLE.
...deon
---
Have you looked at the A/NZ Tivoli User Group website?
http://www.tuganz.org
Deon George, IBM Tivoli Software Engineer, IBM Australia
Office: +61 3 9626 6058, Fax: +61 3 9626 6622, Mobile: +61 412 366
Here's a quick question for you. I have some tape volumes in our 3494 tape
library that contain data for clients that no longer exist. I want to remove
these tape volumes from our library to free up some space, but keep the volumes
just in case.
Now, the problem is that I no longer want them to
Hiya Henrik,
I have recently been doing pretty much what you are trying to achieve. The
problem you have is the biggest issue with the move nodedata command. From
reading across the many articles on here, it appears that the only way to
get rid of the old copypool data is to delete the volumes
Hello all,
(I've searched the list archive and the server readme's
to see if this a known problem but I can't find anything)
Does anybody understand why the second select doesn't
find the node BLAAT2 ?
I must be missing something, but I've been staring
at this for quite some time and I can't see
After restoring a Domino mail database, we were able to open the person's
mailbox even though the use had a password on the file. Is this because we
opened the file from the Domino server and the server id is all powerful?
Bill Boyer
Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. -
Hi Len:
The problem showed up after the migration with the library where we
have our copypools. It reported no tapes to mount. After doing a few
useless things, I called TSM support. The issue was fowarded to level 2
and they requested a trace.
They came back within a day with the cause.
It only
alright they changed the ibm ftp site again!!!. So my hardcoded ftp script
which goes out once a week to check for tsm updates failed once again. Now
if I go under the AIX directory it shows aix32bit, and 64bit. They're use
to be sub-folders for the tsm client under aix according to my hard coded
Hi TSMers
Ok, I have been asking questions about this recently and am trying to work
out what the best order of actions would be. Firstly, the TSM set-up is as
follows :-
TSM Server 4.2.2.12 running on a Solaris 2.7 server. This is connected to
one IBM 3494 library containing two 3590B1A tape
Anyone have experience using Tivoli Decision Support for Storage
Management Analysis?
Thanks,
Bill Sherrill
Hi Bill!
I have! Well... sort of... I tried configuring it some time ago. After a day
or two I gave up. This is some complex piece of software! I call this
implementation software piling. You have to install several components (the
rather expensive Oracle client is one of them) on the client and
To what level downwards are clients compatible to server version 5.2?
(I can't seem to find that in the readme's / references (or I am looking in
the wrong place in which case I would like to be pointed in the right
direction ;-)
We are planning for a server upgrade (windows) from level 4.2.2.6,
I believe you also need a 4.2 Server.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Kirkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 28, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fioScanDirEntry errors
Windows 2000 server running 5.1.5.15 client code. Initial backup
generated many, many of the following
Hi,
5.1.
Supported by Tivoli is +/- 1 client version. If you have a 5.1 server you
can use 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2 clients.
//Henrik
Tuyl Adrie, A.C.
van To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
Yes, this is correct SQL behavior.
If you examine the COLUMNS table for this column, you will see that the
CONTACT field supports null values:
tsm: STORMANselect * from columns
where tabname='NODES' and colname='CONTACT'
Andy,
Thanks for the explanation. I was totally unaware
of this behaviour and I assumed that it was sufficient
to test for the string.
Thanks again.
Kind regards,
Alexander
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02,
I would say it is not correct statement. TDS is product for creating OLAP
reports over management information collected by diverse Tivoli management
products while TSM Operational Reporting is for only for TSM daily
operational reports (Oh, how I hate to repeat the same words twice). TDS
for
-- Has anyone tried eliminating the old copypool data by tweaking the
copygroup parameters down to pretty much nothing ...
Andy, you are suggesting something useless but VERY VERY dangerous!
Tweaking copygroup parameters will force expiration of *primary* pool
copies and only as a consequence
So for me from all I've read it sounds that the choice is between:
a) upgrade to 3590H and be forced to upgrade to v5.1.6 at once with all
bridges burned behind
b) upgrade quickly (but not at the speed of the light) to v5.1.6 and have
a step back available
In best case scenario both ways ought to
If this was not possible on the original database, it ought to be
considered a bug, proved as re-createable and reported through support to
an APAR (if one is not already opened).
If the behavior seen was there before the backup (if you can check it), it
ought to be normal. Check in Notes:
1. File
I have tried, but I can't figure out how to get more than one
reclamation process going at a time. Any ideas?
thanks
Gene
One process per storage pool is the limit for TSM.
But you can accomplish the same thing yourself by cranking up MOVE DATA
vv RECONSTRUCT=YES.
-Original Message-
From: Gene Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
However, all inactive versions will still expire due to mgmtclass retention
or domain grace period. If you only wat active data retained, then that's
fine, but if you want to retain everything as exists at this moment,
including inactive files, you might consider doing an EXPORT NODE
Hi folks,
I currently have:
TSM server on AIX
TSM server 5.1.7.2 (32-bit)
AIX 5.1 (64-bit kernel)
The hardware is a 6H1
How do I upgrade/convert from the 32-bit binaries to the 64-bit binaries?
I currently have this installed:
tivoli.tivguid 1.1.0.0C FIBM Tivoli GUID
I have some old database files that are no longer useful hanging around in
my backups and I'd really like to expire them so that I can recalim the
media they are sitting on. Is there a way to expire specific files or
backups in a certain date range for a specific client?
Thanks.
--
Chris
Hi List ...
Has this ever happened to you?
I have only two tape drives, so they pretty much run non-stop.
But when someone goes in to do a restore, whatever is running gets
preempted and the restore gets completed as a priority.
But sometimes.for some reason..TSM does not preempt
Hi,
I've loss a recovery log. Is there a way to repair the DB or to I need to
format the DB an LOG files and restore the DB?
FF
Back in the dark days before I saw the light of TSM :) ... there was another
product
on another platform. ( Syback on IBM VM, from SyncSort Inc. ) It has a
wonderful
restore interface, that was easy for END USERS or anyone else to do restores
with.
It would allow any user that had WRITE
I have some old database files that are no longer useful hanging around in
my backups and I'd really like to expire them so that I can recalim the
media they are sitting on. Is there a way to expire specific files or
backups in a certain date range for a specific client?
You don't specify your
Delete Filespace may be what you're looking for.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/02/03 04:39PM
I have some old database files
From: Rothecker, Chris ISC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have some old database files that are no longer useful hanging around in
my backups and I'd really like to expire them so that I can recalim the
media they are sitting on. Is there a way to expire specific files or
backups in a certain date
36 matches
Mail list logo
