3590 slot access problem

2003-10-01 Thread Ganu Sachin, IBM
Hi, I have a 3590 E11 drive shared by 2 RS/6000 servers say server A server B, running AIX 4.3.3 and TSM 5.1. I have a peculiar problem on this drive. The ACF magazine has total 10 slots but server A can not access (labeling, check-in operations are not possible) slot number 7 8 (TSM level

Re: Tape Technology Comparison

2003-10-01 Thread Pole, Stephen
Well, that's a pretty broad question. I am sure someone will get around to an answer soon. Here's my piece for what it is worth. Surprised no one offered 3590 technology!! Price could be it. But the second hand market is pretty ok. Mind you the sales guy would not make as much then would he?

how to disable TSM db mirroring?

2003-10-01 Thread Zosimo Noriega
Hi All, How to disable TSM db mirroring? Please help me. Here is the configuration of my db: Volume Name (Copy 1) Volume Name (Copy 2) Volume Name (Copy 3) /tsm/db/db1.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy1.dsm /tsm/db/db2.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy2.dsm /tsm/db/db3.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy3.dsm

AW: how to disable TSM db mirroring?

2003-10-01 Thread Thomas Carduck
Hi, you can delete the copy volumes from TSM with delete dbvolume /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopyX.dsm with X as the volume Number. After Maintenance you can recreate the volumes with the dsmfmt tool and define the volumes in TSM with : define dbcopy /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopyX.dsm I think it's a good idea to do

Storagetek L180

2003-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I've got a TSM server version 4.1.2 running on Windows2000. The library is a Storagetek L180 with three DLT8000 drives. The customer will change two of the drives with SDLT320 drives. 1. Does TSM 4.1.2 support already SDLT320 drives or is an upgrade to TSM 5.2.x required. 2. How about

Re: restore/retrieve optimalisation

2003-10-01 Thread Remco Post
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:49:45 +0800 Pole, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe this will help. Try this Redbook SG246844 Disaster recovery Strategies using TSM Section 8.3.3 page 179 Tape storage pools Which is more or less the information that the concepts redbook also gives. What

Re: SQL query

2003-10-01 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Steve, Christian and Mark! Thank you very much for your replies! Looks like my diskpool is way too small. I'll have to take some actions here, thanks! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

Novell to NT data migration

2003-10-01 Thread Bernard Rosenbloom
We use TSM v5 to back up Novell netware5 file servers and TSM v5/4.2 to back up Novell netware 4 file servers. We want to restore the data (using TSM) to Windows 2000 file servers.. We won't be restoring applications,O/S or executables from Novell to windows only folders and files. Restoring file

Re: restore/retrieve optimalisation

2003-10-01 Thread Andrew Raibeck
See the client manual chapter Restoring your data, sections Standard restore process and No query restore process. Also see chapter Managing Data for Client Nodes, section Optimizing Restore Operations for Clients in the most current server Admin Guide for additional info on optimizing for

policies

2003-10-01 Thread Wojciech Zukowski
Hi, I have to define and start backups with policies: daily archive - keep for 31 days and on 1st day of every month archive - keep for 1 year. how to do this? with copy storagepools of different schedules? STSM server is running AIX. regards Wojtek

Re: restore/retrieve optimalisation

2003-10-01 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Remco! The old TSM Windows client contained an HTML based live demo which explained the progressive incremental. I can send it to you if you want? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of files

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Trancygier
We are currently having problems performing incremental backups on a file system that has a large amount of files. The daily changes to this file system are small so we are only sending approximately 5 - 10 gig per backup however, since there are around 3,000,000 files to examine, the backup

L700e library with LTO2. Definition problems on AIX

2003-10-01 Thread Ochs, Duane
This is a new install. TSM 5.2.1.1 on AIX 5.2 64-bit enabled. L700e with LTO2 fibre drives. Drives defined fine as Tivoli devices. The robotics will not define, the lsattr comes back empty. From the smit log: lsattr -c library -s 'scsi' -t 'ADSM-SCSI-LB' -D -O I had to apply a lsattr fix

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of files

2003-10-01 Thread Justin Bleistein
there maybe a trade off with a selective backup of that filesystem or an archive since there's no compare operations associated there. You may have to do some benchmarking though to prove it.. thanks!. --Justin Richard Bleistein Unix/TSM Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing) Desk: (856) 566 -

Re: restore/retrieve optimalisation

2003-10-01 Thread Remco Post
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:30:48 -0600 Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See the client manual chapter Restoring your data, sections Standard restore process and No query restore process. Also see chapter Managing Data for Client Nodes, section Optimizing Restore Operations for Clients in

nightly backup

2003-10-01 Thread LeBlanc, Patricia
All of a sudden we are getting an error that we've never seen before. They all are with the adsm.sys folder and they all specify the management class error. We haven't changed a thing on the server where TSM is concerned and our server group swears they haven't changed a thing on the client

Re: SV: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of files

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Trancygier
We are running the TSM client and server on AIX. I thought journaled bakups were only supported on Win 2000 and NT ? Thanks, Mark. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/03 09:51AM You can use journal backup. - Michael -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Mark Trancygier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RMAN crosscheck command and ITSM for DB 5.2

2003-10-01 Thread Neil Rasmussen
Matt, Rman crosscheck will only expire those backups that belong to that node during the RMAN crosscheck. This statement does not belong in the manual, I am glad that you pointed this out. There is no need for your DBA's to be concerned that other data is needlessly getting expired.

Re: SV: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of files

2003-10-01 Thread Karel Bos
One of the things I do wen journaled services aren't a option is splitting the TSM client into 2 or more TSM nodes, each with its own dirs/filespaces. This brought back-up time for large fileservers down by half. Regard, Karel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Mark Trancygier [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: restore/retrieve optimalisation

2003-10-01 Thread Richard Sims
The old TSM Windows client contained an HTML based live demo which explained the progressive incremental. I can send it to you if you want? The TSM online Flash demo would seem to be the same product overview: http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/demos/storage-mgr.html Another good

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of files

2003-10-01 Thread asr
= On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:27:41 -0400, Mark Trancygier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: We are currently having problems performing incremental backups on a file system that has a large amount of files. The daily changes to this file system are small so we are only sending approximately 5 - 10 gig per

Backupsets on FILE devclasses: Mobile or not?

2003-10-01 Thread asr
So, I'm thinking of some DR scenaria, and I was considering: If I make a backupset on a FILE devclass, and somehow consipre to move that backupset to a box that I think might need it, can I restore from it just as a file on disk? Hmm, I think I should experiment, but I was curious if anyone had

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large numb er of files

2003-10-01 Thread Wheelock, Michael D
Hi, I will throw this out there, though it is a wintel solution and will not function as a solution under aix. We had a system with about 3 million files. The disk was SAN attached and quite speedy. The system was gig-ethernet attached and had no cpu/memory bottlencks. Journaling wasn't an

Re: nightly backup

2003-10-01 Thread Hooft, Jeroen
Is the backup of the other files/folders successful? When i saw this error, I deleted a (dummy) storagepool. (I also claimed, I didn't change the setup) Maybe this will help: Check if the adsm.sys folder has got a special managementclass in the include/exlude-list (dsm.opt or clopt) Check to

Re: Moving 3583 from WinNT to Win2000 server

2003-10-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
I have a Win2K server running a 3583 without RSM at TSM 5.1.6.2. NO problems. Documentation is confusing, though. First thing you have to do is disable the RSM service. Then install the 3583 driver that you download from IBM. Then when you boot, the TSM device wizard will see the library.

Re: Tape Technology Comparison

2003-10-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
Same here. Our robotics are 9840 (A's) in 9710 libraries, the previous generation before the 9940/L700 combination. The STK robotics are incredibly elegant, fast, and reliable. The 9840's are also rock solid and will take an incredible pounding; we have had periods when we RUN the drives, 4 at a

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number offiles

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Trancygier
Thanks Allen. I think the virtualmountpoint option will be the best way to go, as we have a pretty hearty SAN environment and I don't believe we have client disk contention. Are you aware of any limitations on the number of virtualmountpoints per client ? Thanks, Mark. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tape Technology Comparison

2003-10-01 Thread Richard Sims
... If I were running a shop that supports TSM/HSM functions, I would argue for the highest-end product you can buy and go with either 3590 or STK. In a shop with a goodly amount of money, based upon my experience I'd go for tiered tape technologies: something like a 3590 library for primary tape

TSM DR

2003-10-01 Thread Rowan O'Donoghue
All, The one thing I've always found to be a downside to TSM is the ability to easily identify the EXACT amount of tapes required to rebuild an environment to it's most current state. I have wrote SQL scripts previously which performs a query against each TSM client and it's filespaces for those

disk for library

2003-10-01 Thread Otto Schakenbos
We are researching on getting a big disk array we want to use in tsm as a virt. library. So we define this disk array as a filetype library and use it to backup the clients. Then we make a copy storage pool using a normal tape library and take these tapes off site. We have a pretty small

Re: TSM DR

2003-10-01 Thread Richard Sims
The one thing I've always found to be a downside to TSM is the ability to easily identify the EXACT amount of tapes required to rebuild an environment to it's most current state. ... That has been a Holy Grail quest for us customers. There remains no feasible way to get such a list from the

Re: TSM DR

2003-10-01 Thread Rowan O'Donoghue
Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming! In terms of when a DR is performed for a client, surely the TSM client performs a similar query with the TSM server to identify the files required to be restored? Maybe there's a smooth streamlined script for this purpose that IBM just dont

SAP User Exits

2003-10-01 Thread Shawn Price
Hi all, I sent this out a few days ago but never saw it on the list, so here goes again. I have a question regarding Lan_free and db2 user exits. We are currently running in an AIX environment (AIX 5.1 and a 5.1.7.1 TSM server and 4.33 on the clients) with SAP on DB2. Last week we implemented

TSM and command logging

2003-10-01 Thread Stanley, Jon
Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of inexperienced (in TSM) staff. We want a way to audit (beyond the normal activity log)

Re: TSM DR

2003-10-01 Thread Steve Roder
show volumeusage [nodename] certainly helps...note too that the show commands are undocumented and unsupported. On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rowan O'Donoghue wrote: Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming! In terms of when a DR is performed for a client, surely the TSM client performs

TSM Operational Reporting Tool

2003-10-01 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone! I have just installed TSM's Operational Reporting Tool and I am having problems with the email notification connection. It keeps telling me that it is having problems with the SMTP server name. Here is the information I have been given for the 2 mainframe servers that I am

Re: Exporting a TSM Server Across Platforms

2003-10-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
I believe you have to export the client data as well. IF not, you are assuming that data written by MVS drivers (yes, I know we don't call them drivers in MVS, but still...) is in a format that can be read by AIX drivers. The whole point of EXPORT is to create a portable format that can move

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large numb er of files

2003-10-01 Thread Alex Paschal
Michael, that's weird. I believe you, but I just had to say that it's weird. Mark, for AIX, since there's no journaled backups there, have you considered -incrbydate's during the week, then a regular incremental on the weekend? This greatly sped up the backup of one of our very large file

Ghost dtabase volume

2003-10-01 Thread Ward, Stuart
I have a database volume that appears in Storage Manager - labelled as off-line, but I cannot delete as it says it is not defined?? The file itself does not exist. Any suggestions on how I remove it? Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may

LOG.NSF - backup it up or not?

2003-10-01 Thread Bill Boyer
Domino R5 and TDP Domino 5.1.5 The sample DSM.OPT file supplied by the TDP agent excludes the LOG.NSF file. I just had a Domino admin question why it wasn't being backed up... I had no answer to that. Would backing up LOG.NSF be a good thing to start doing? Or just leave the default Exclude?

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number offiles

2003-10-01 Thread asr
= On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:56:41 -0400, Mark Trancygier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thanks Allen. I think the virtualmountpoint option will be the best way to go, as we have a pretty hearty SAN environment and I don't believe we have client disk contention. Are you aware of any limitations on the

Path definition

2003-10-01 Thread Sylvia Nergard
Hi folks! My environment is TSM 5.2 on Windows 2000, tapelibrary is 3583 lto on the SAN. II wonder.when defining path for tapelibrary and drives, should the device parameter be \\.\Tape0 and Changer0 (which is how Windows sees the devices?)etc, or mt0.0.0.1 an lb1.0.0.1(which is how TSM

Re: Path definition

2003-10-01 Thread Himanshu A Madhani
Hi Sylvia, Use mt0.0.0.1 and lb1.0.0.1 to define path it will work - Himanshu Sylvia Nergard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/2003 01:49 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:

Re: Path definition

2003-10-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
I am TSM 5.1.6.2, Win2K, 3583, LTO1, SCSI not SAN. I use the mt0.0.0.x and lbx.0.0.1 names in the path defs. If you will start the TSM device configuration wizard from the TSM console icon, those are the names that show up, and the wizard will even create the device path defs for you.

Re: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large numb er of files

2003-10-01 Thread Dave Canan
One comment I would like to make here is with Michael Wheelock's post. He makes a comment that journaling wasn't an option as this was a clustered system. This is not correct. Windows journaling IS supported and does work on a MS Clustered system. We have had several instances of this

Moving TSM from one platform to another

2003-10-01 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Is it possible to move from MVS to AIX without having to export all client node data so long are your storage device is the same on both environments? i.e. if my current environment has 2000 tapes full of client data, and I want to move my environment from MVS to AIX, do I essentially have to

Re: Moving TSM from one platform to another

2003-10-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
Yes, it's ugly. Yes, as far as I know, exporting all the client data is the only supported method. Yes, it's a HECK of a lot of work. Yes, it takes your 2000 tapes, creates 2000 portable tapes, which get imported to create 2000 tapes. I forget which version of TSM you are running; starting in

Re: Path definition

2003-10-01 Thread Dmitri Pasyutin
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 22:49, Sylvia Nergard wrote: My environment is TSM 5.2 on Windows 2000, tapelibrary is 3583 lto on the SAN. II wonder.when defining path for tapelibrary and drives, should the device parameter be \\.\Tape0 and Changer0 (which is how Windows sees the

Re: Moving TSM from one platform to another

2003-10-01 Thread Patrick Boutilier
I am currently replacing an ADSM 3.1.2.90 AIX sever with a TSM 5.1.5.x Linux server. My solution was to export the server and policies without any file data. I created a file device on an NFS filesystem and have been exporting/importing a node at a time. If you have the ability to run two servers

Subfile backup on Netware

2003-10-01 Thread John Stephens
Question: Is the subfile backup feature available with the Netware clients. I know it is used on the Win2k platforms, but have not seen any info about it not being supported on different clients. Thanks John Stephens

Re: Moving TSM from one platform to another

2003-10-01 Thread Alex Paschal
I'm not sure what the difference is between MVS and os/390 and z/OS. I only saw TSM 4.1 for MVS, but I saw 5.2 for os/390 and z/OS. If you can run 5.2, then you can EXPORT NODE TOSERVER=aixtsmserver. That ought to greatly ease your migration. That being said, I think I'm going to wander over

TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Ferraretto
All, I am running TSM 5.1.6.1 on AIX 5.1ML3. In the last few weeks it's started exhibiting a rather strange problem where the scheduler seems not to contact the clients to start the backup schedule. Halting TSM and restarting it seems to fix it for a few days and then it will start again.

Re: TSM Scheduler not contacting clients

2003-10-01 Thread Deon George
Hey Mark, Could your TSM server be running out of sessions (as per MAX SESSIONS?) - perhaps you have tape mounts holding running sessions, (thus holding their completion for new sessions)? The prompter will only contact nodes when it has session slots available during the backup startup window.