Hi,
Do you know, from where i can download IC34566 fix
Thanks
Zlatko Krastev
Ameerul,
Try looking for a possible solution on www.ibm.com.
1. Go to www.ibm.com
2. In the upper right part of the screen, there is
a Search field. Enter the following in that field
ACD5130E
You will find some articles written that address this symptom.
Thanks,
Del
Hi all,
Env: TSM 4.2 on W2K, IBM-3583 library, 2x LTO-1 drives.
Now I am planning migration of all data from one set of LTO-1 media to
another (due to intensive media errors). I will have two new LTO-1 drives
available and new set of media. In TSM v5.2 is possible to define multiple
logical
Hi,
From the IBM website:
Exclusive multi-path architecture increases configuration flexibility with
logical library partitioning.
So, you can define 2 logical libraries with each a set of drive (2 if you
want) and its own set of tapeslots.
Yes, it will work.
Regard,
Karel
Hi,
it's well described in redbook SG24-6502-01.
best regards,
Kirsten Gler
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: Karel Bos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2003 13:59
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Two virtual libraries in one physical (IBM3583)
Hi,
From the
Can someone tell me what is going on with a client(s) that has a status of In Progress
when I query the event? When I query the event for the previous day, the status
indicates that the event is in progress. When I query the event for the current day,
the event status shows future. When I
Your schedule window for yesterday has not expired, hence in progress
your enquiry for today is looking at start time this evening hence future.
cheers,
John
**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be
We are closing in on bringing up Z/OS 1.4 and with it a new version of
TSM server. It looks like 5.1.7 was delivered with our server pac (FMID
HDN5510). In a meeting earlier this week a Tivoli rep recommended that
we go ahead and pull down the latest server level (5.2.1 w/5.2.2 due in
early Dec.)
Am I off base in suggesting that query events is not a
reliable way to check backup status?
We've found that you can have:
--events that say Missed, but you DO have a good backup
(it started late, or was run manually, etc, but it WAS done)
--events that say Completed, but you DON'T have a
Ladies, Gentlemen,
following up to my (maybe confused) question yesterday, I think my
question boils down to this:
How does 'restore ... replace=no' work?
That is, what does it take for a file to not be replaced?
Is name and location already sufficient?
Or does the client check for
Hi *,
we have 2 TSM-Server runs on 2 x AIX-nodes (AIX 4.3.3). Both server runs
with 4.2.2.6 (I know, no support, but I want now migrate to TSM 5.1).
So I update the first server to Version TSM 4.2.4.0
Now (after the update) I observe many many entries during a expiration on
this server with the
Hi,
at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1.
If you are at 4.x you should have a look at:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ80211
We had big problems with the performance during upgradedb (AuditDB run 80h with a 16GB
database and used over 65h CPU).
After the ZAP
Expiration is running without the quiet option. When scheduled update the
command by adding quiet=yes, else modify the dsmserv.opt.
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Frank Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 november 2003 15:12
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joachim,
Thanks, I remember seeing something about this earlier. I wonder if it
applies, though, as we are moving from 4.1.x and the problem description
specifically references 4.2 and 5.1
From what release did you jump to 5.1.6?
Stumpf, Joachim wrote:
Hi,
at the moment we are migrating
Hi, folks.
I'm having a trouble with TSM Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0
Whem I run Expire inventory, I received the following message:
11/04/2003 07:00:10 ANR0106E imarqry.c(4633): Unexpected error 2 fetching row
in table Archive.Descriptions.
11/04/2003 07:00:10
Try increasing the mount retention parameter on your device class. I
don't think it'll affect the behavior after a label operation though.
Mooney
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Ochani
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 19:40
I would recommend that you consult the client manual, which includes a
reference chapter for client options.
If, after reading the information on REPLACE you still don't understand
it, let me know what is not clear.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:58:36 -0200
Jorge Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, folks.
I'm having a trouble with TSM Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0
Whem I run Expire inventory, I received the following message:
11/04/2003 07:00:10 ANR0106E imarqry.c(4633): Unexpected error 2
fetching row
Hi TSMers
TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
What's the best way to make all tapes in our TAPEPOOL read-only. I don't
want the TAPEPOOL itself read-only, just the volumes it's using at present.
Then it can start using new scratch tapes from now on.
Thanks
Farren Minns - John Wiley Sons Ltd
Hi Karel,
thanks for your answer.
The problem is not the detailed output, but the number of entries in the
log. The option was on both server on detaillet.
But I did not see ever so many same entries before.
The expiration runs on this server 1 x hour and I get 1 message per
expiration in the
update volume _volume_name acc=reado
- Original Message -
From: Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: How to mark all TAPEPOOL volumes read only
Hi TSMers
TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
What's the best way to make all
Hi again all
TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
Tomorrow we are having our B1A drives upgraded to H1A (housed in a 3494
library). Once this has been done, I understand that I will need to mark
all TAPEPOOL volumes as readonly (see prev post), but can I assume that I
need to relable all the scratch tapes
i think that this is the feature of new version ...
- Original Message -
From: Frank Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Antwort: Re: ANR4391I during expiration
Hi Karel,
thanks for your answer.
The problem is not the
this will do it:
upd vol * wherestg=TAPEPOOL acc=reado
Regards,
Al Barth
t-14 days
Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/05/03 09:08 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Jim,
I didn't recognize that you are at 4.1.
I think theres no problem with the upgrade for you, because the problems we had were
with the systemobjects of windows nodes which were included with 4.2.
Our migrations:
3.7 -- 4.1.3 -- 4.1.5 -- 5.1.0.0 -- 5.1.1.6 -- 5.1.5.0 -- 5.1.5.3 -- 5.1.6.1
The following is the proper (and only) method to restore a damaged
volume:
1. Run UPDATE VOLUME 100ABN ACCESS=DESTROYED. This will enable step
#2.
2. Run RESTORE VOLUME 100ABN PREVIEW=YES. Review the results in the
activity log to get the
names of the copy pool volumes required to rebuild the
Or..
(if your storage pool name is TAPEPOOL, then)
update volume * access=readonly wherestgpool=tapepool
goran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/05/2003 09:16 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
In the past when I went from B1A to E1A: besides marking all the private
tapes READO, I also Deleted all the scratch tapes and put them back into
category FF00 and then followed up with a LABEL LIBV. Other people have
claimed this isn't neccessary. I figure why guess? Better to know.
Regards,
Lan,
In general, DOMAIN is used to specify drives or special objects such as
the system objects, system services, etc. Since \\nodename\g$\inetpub is
most likely a directory, not a drive or share name, it is not a valid
DOMAIN item. As I mentioned before, I would recommend that you read the
Hi,
This was some of the things that changes in one of the upgrades, and one of
the reasons we turned detailed off...
Regard,
Karel
ps Reclamation once every hour??? Nice that you can, but why?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Frank Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 5
Could someone with TDP Exchange experience comment on what
the following copy group definition for TDP Exchange clients
would mean for tdp object retention?
Versions Data Exists 90
Versions Data Deleted 90
Retain Extra Versions 90
Retain Only Version 90
Thanks.
Tom
Thomas L. Fought
Does TSM support Exchange 2003 yet?
Thanks
Mehdi Amini
LAN/WAN Engineer
ValueOptions
12369 Sunrise Valley Drive
Suite C
Reston, VA 20191
Phone: 703-390-6855
Fax: 703-390-2581
**
This email and any files
Not that I'm aware of. We're waiting for this as well because we moved
from 2000 to 2003 and the TDP no longer functions.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Amini, Mehdi
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will, if you use the correct TDP version:
Software Requirements
-
Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange version 5.2.1
requires the following MINIMUM software levels:
- Microsoft Windows NT Server SP5
Microsoft Windows 2000 Server SP3
Microsoft Windows Server
Hi,
TSM supports Exchange 2003 as of TDP Mail for Exchange 5.2.1 which is
avaiable electronically (I haven't gotten my cd yet). We have it installed,
and have tested everything short of a complete disaster recovery.
Michael Wheelock
Integris Health of Oklahoma
-Original Message-
From:
Hi *,
o.k. when this is normal with the new version I will change also the
parameter!
Reclamation once every hour??? Nice that you can, but why?
You are right. This is very often and I reduce it to 1 per day. The library
on this server has only few volumes, therefore I must often create place.
I guess I should rephrase the question.
Can someone tell me what the when I query an event what in-progress in the status
column means?
This isn't making much sense to me. For example, today I queried the events for my
nt_backups. I queried my events for the past 3 days. The output seem
Hi,
Be very careful about clients in the event record recorded as In Progress.
In Progress means the back-up is still running. Because you sent your Q
SESS output, we know that the TSM server hasn't any running back-up
sessions, so someone isn't on track.
I would recommend that you either take a
actually I just did a migration from 4 3590B to 6 3590E
You do not have to change access on all tapepool tapes to read-only, only the ones
with the status of FILLING although doing it to the entire pool will not cause any
problems. you will however have to move the data from the filling volumes
Thanks to all who answered these question for me.
Very much appreciated
All the best
Farren Minns - John Wiley Sons Ltd
|+---+|
|| Bill Fitzgerald ||
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andy, all,
On 05.11.2003 16:01, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
I would recommend that you consult the client manual, which includes a
reference chapter for client options.
This is from ansbc550.pdf, page 194, obtained from
http://web.urz.uni-heidelberg.de/ADSM/ibmdoc.tsm51/aix/pdf/unixc/ansbc550.pdf
,
We have Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle running on two systems. In each
case we have defined a separate node name for TDP as the documentation
recommends. We are currently backing up one Oracle instance on each system
but are getting ready to extend TDP coverage to additional instances.
Our
There is a separate issue that has never been clear to me. If a file
is not written to disk because of the replace=no option, does the TSM
server refrain from reading the file from tape, or does the TSM server
read the file and send it to the client, only to have the client code
discard the data?
To me, not clear is the meaning of existing file.
Given a file in my backup, foo.avi, with a creation
and modification date, and a size of 1 Gigabyte.
Given a file foo.avi (same name) on my harddisk in
the same location from which the backup has been
created, with the same creation date as
We are using a diferent tdpo.opt file with a diferent filespace on each
one for diferent oracle instances. So always the same node.
That is what I can tell you.
If you need more details about how to make it, do not hesitate to ask for
files details.
Juan Manuel López.
ING National Nederlanden
Reading all these messages I think its clear that the client documentation
has to be updated to answer all these questions from a users point of few
and not to the experience of the user.
replace = no story. If you try to save a file with the same name to a
directory the OS will not let you, so
Andy,
On 05.11.2003 17:58, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
Now I restore this file to the original location,
with replace=no - what happens?
Because foo.avi already exists, foo.avi is not restored.
Ok, got that. Thanks! :)
Does TSM not replace the file, since the existing
file (even though with different
Tom,
First... I am assuming you are referring to
Data Protection for Exchange version 2 or higher.
Version 2 and higher use standard TSM policy management.
(Version 1 used different policy management.)
These settings basically mean that you will be
able to restore any full backup for that last
Thanks Del.
Now that I understand that, how about commenting on
each of the copy group items in my example, supply a
definition which is easily understandable, an example
would suffice. I have read the redbook and I am still
confused.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler
Tobi,
To (kind of, but not really) address your question from yesterday, when
doing a restore of large disk volumes, it's good to use the command line
client and tee your output into a file. You can often avoid these kinds of
issues by looking at that output file to see which file the restore
I believe, when IBM was working on the zap, I was told that there was a
problem moving from the 4.1 version - something about a legacy member table
instead of the backup groups table problem. I'm running at the 5.2.1.1 level
with the zap.
-Original Message-
From: Stumpf, Joachim
You can check Redbook sg246147 Using TDP for MS Exchange Server
Chapter 2.3.1 Policies and management classes ; there is really good and in depth
explanation of how the backup works.
I didn't fully understand it when I read it, but after I setup test environment and
tried it everything cleared
Tom,
VERExists
Specifies the maximum number of backup versions to retain
for storage groups/databases that are currently on the Exchange Server.
VERDeleted
Specifies the maximum number of backup versions to retain
for storage groups/databases that have been deleted from the
Exchange
If you have anymore questions about my system layout, contact
me:
1. The server is a Sun 4500 with 4 400MHz Sparc III procs and 4GB RAM.
Attached to the system is 1 D100 disk array used to hold the OS. All of
the TSM volumes are held on A5200 fiber channel arrays (3 of them
containing
Client Info:
Netware 5 sp6
Client level 4.1.3.0
When I upgrade the client to 5.1.5.15, will I have to reboot netware?
Thanks,
Marc
No, in fact once I've expanded the client once my upgrade process
involves renaming the existing Tivoli folder out of the way and copying
the new one in. You will need to manually load and run a backup to
reestablish the passwords and ID's, although you can cheat on that as
well.
Even if you
Hello Group,
I'm trying to restore a TSM database to a disaster recovery copy of
one of our remote TSM servers without success. I installed TSM onto the DR
box, copied the DEVCFG.OUT and VOLHIST.OUT files into the directory where
the new server was built. When I try to restore the
I ran into this a few weeks ago. I had to format the log and DB
volumes before the restore would work. Something like:
dsmserv format numberoflogfiles logfilenames numberofdbvolumes
dbvolnames
ie
dsmserv format 1 /adsmlog/log1 1 /adsmdb/db1
You only need to do the prime
Eric,
Oracle 9i introduced the concept of autobackups for the control file.
During the autobackup process, Oracle dynamically generates the
backuppiece name for the control files that are being saved. During this
backup processing, a unique name is generated by Oracle prior to backing
it up and
I have received a similar error using TDP 2.2.1.0 for Oracle 8 with TSM
server at 4.2.1. This setup has been functional for over a year and then
out of the blue one night.
from the actlog on the server:
ANE4994S (Session: 732, Node: XX) TDP Oracle
AIX ANU0599
Does anyone have a good understanding of the Lotus Notes Data Protection
Agents and their history? From what I can gather there are/were 3 versions..
1.1.x
2.1.x
5.1.x
Similarly there are different versions of notes - 4.x, 5.x, 6.x..
What is restore-compatible with what in this matrix? If I
Alex,
On 05.11.2003 19:04, Alex Paschal wrote:
Tobi,
To (kind of, but not really) address your question from yesterday, when
doing a restore of large disk volumes, it's good to use the command line
client and tee your output into a file. You can often avoid these kinds of
issues by looking at
Gerald,
There was an old client called ADSMConnect Agent for Lotus Notes.
That worked at the item level, and was only supported on Notes 4.
Lotus introduced a backup API starting with Domino 5.
Data Protection for Lotus Domino supports Domino 5 and Domino 6.
The history of the releases looks
Thanks Mark and Ted
Increasing the retention setting worked.
On 5 Nov 2003 at 6:49, Mark Mooney wrote:
Try increasing the mount retention parameter on your device class. I
don't think it'll affect the behavior after a label operation though.
Mooney
-Original Message-
From:
Hi to all
I have a question regarding TSM Client.
How can i restart the TSM Client on Windows2000?
Thanks
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and
may be subject to legal
65 matches
Mail list logo
