Hello
I need to be sure about the correct steps to manage a damage tape and the
fastest way:
1. Did I need to make a MOVE DATA and AUDIT VOL fix=yes instead to do
right away a RESTORE VOL from the copypool (I think I will gain time .)
and a DEL VOL of the damage tape.
2. If during a
I personally prefer the mixed scenario:
- using include/exclude list of the API client metadata is sent to a
dedicated disk pool (which *does not* migrate to tape)
- full and differential backups go direct to tape
- transaction log backups go to another disk pool which in turn migrates
to tape
As
Let me first ask a question before answering yours: why are you going to
*downgrade*?? Are you going to use 3583 somewhere else? It can be upgraded
with Ultrium 2 drives.
You can read from and even write to existing tapes without paying
attention what is the name of the new library. You can
mkisofs + cdrecord
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Renee Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09.12.2003 23:11
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Backsets To Removable Media
As any other v4.1 client this one is out of support.
Even if it was supported, I would expect some change after SCO's attempt
to squeeze some money from IBM :-)
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09.12.2003
Hi
We are going to use that existing 3583 library at a new site. We purchased
the 3582 with u2 drives for existing site, as this site has fewer nodes and
the data capacity is more.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 December 2003 10:42 AM
Willem,
what I can see from the accounting log is that the backup has an enormous
amount of media wait. There are two records for that backup which I
interprete as the two mount points. One mount point should be for the tape
that has the meta data and the other mount point for the data itself.
Robert,
1. No, you don't have to do the move data first. You might not even have
the original tape if it were lost or broken. Before you do the restore
volume, you must mark it destroyed, however. The reason for the move data
is to save time if you have the original and some data is restorable
I need to be sure about the correct steps to manage a damage tape and the
fastest way:
1. Did I need to make a MOVE DATA and AUDIT VOL fix=yes instead to do
right away a RESTORE VOL from the copypool (I think I will gain time ...)
and a DEL VOL of the damage tape.
1. No, you don't have to
I just upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2 from 5.1.1.6 on AIX 5.1ML5 64bit.
One thing I noticed is that when I do a Q PR it is not formated correctly
on the screen. Has anybody else seen this is there a fix for it? Also
is there anything else I need to watch out for?
Thanks,
I want to run TDPOSYNC on one of my Oracle DB's.
TSM ver is 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1. TDP ver 2.2.0 with Oracle 8.1.6 8.1.7 on
AIX 4.3.3.
I have noticed that the old backups archivelog backups are not being
expired. These is my settings:
Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt
I have seen this during upgrade to 5.1.1
Did you install using ALL AVAILABLE SOFTWARE in smitty?
You might miss the messages-file. (tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server)
-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 10 december 2003 13:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you set Backdelete=yes in the node definition?
-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 10 december 2003 14:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDPOSYNC
I want to run TDPOSYNC on one of my Oracle DB's.
TSM ver is 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1. TDP ver
Yiannakis
One thought... you should send the meta data to a
disk only storage pool. These meta data objects are always
very small (less than 100K)... and to put them to a
tape is not good for performance. You do that by binding
the meta objects to a management class that points to
a disk only
A drive on an NT 4 fileserver which was mapped to a RAID unit containing
about 120 GB of data has been copied to a new RAID unit with greater
capacity. The data was copied using scopy using appropriate flags to
preserve permissions and modification dates. The original drive letter
was then
Sorry, Richard, you are correct that the tape does not need to be marked
destroyed before the restore is run.
It is, however, good practice to immediately mark a tape destroyed if it has
been destroyed physically or you simply can't find it. I have a customer
who is going through this situation
Yes, we upgraded to 5.2.1.3 on AIX and have the odd formatting
in the q proc output. No fix that I know of, luckily it is just
cosmetic as far as I can tell.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Wednesday,
Hello all,
Can anyone verify (e.g. has anyone got it) that TSM 4.2.x will run on AIX
5.2?
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel
Consultant
IBM CATE, TSM Certified Consultant
Solution Professional Services B.V.
HI Guys
Mark, did you ever get this problem solved, 'cuase I'm now sitting with a
similar problem?
When I attempt to read data of a cartridge with a bad block, the server goes
belly up.
I've upgrade from 5.1.5.0 to 5.1.8.0, along with the device driver. I'm sure
this problem only started after
I guess:
have a look at TSM - assigned Filespacename:
Query Filespace your_nodename
This gives you a view what TSM found to be different
and maybe an opportunity to change it.
I recall that with NT4 and an older version of TSM
the LABEL of the disk/FileSystem made the difference as
5 Million files on ext2? Hope you never have to fsck that monster. You
may want to talk to the admin about using reiserfs
-Lloyd
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:49:39 -0500
Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote thusly:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:29:59 -0500
Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a problem that keeps getting fixed and then coming back in
almost every release!
IMHO, the real problem is the way the STATUS field is formatted in the
PROCESSES table. It's formatted to be readable by humans. It's very
difficult to parse in scripts because it contains new lines to
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:23:48 +0100
Richard van Denzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Can anyone verify (e.g. has anyone got it) that TSM 4.2.x will run on AIX
5.2?
why would you want to install an ancient, unsupported version of TSM?
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:58:01 -0500
Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2 from 5.1.1.6 on AIX 5.1ML5 64bit.
One thing I noticed is that when I do a Q PR it is not formated correctly
on the screen. Has anybody else seen this is there a fix for it? Also
is there
Amen to that!
-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Lead Architect
www.servergraph.com
512-482-6138 ext 105
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Robin Sharpe
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We can't remember what the file name is that the license registration is
looking for. Can anyone help?
Tammy Schellenberg
Systems Administrator, MCP
Prospera Credit Union
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DID: 604-864-6578
Chaos, panic, disorder - my work here is done.
This email and any files
Yes
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
We can't remember what the file name is that the license registration is
looking for. Can anyone help?
Look for *.lic files in the server installation directory.
On the TSM server admin command line the format to register is REGISTER
LICENSE FILE=. NUMBER=x
You get those file name in the bin directory of the tsm server
All are listed with the extension .lic
For example, msexch.lis is for exchange
Or mssql.lis is for Microsoft SQL
Renee Davis
Thanx I think I got it.
Tammy Schellenberg
Systems Administrator, MCP
Prospera Credit Union
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DID: 604-864-6578
Chaos, panic, disorder - my work here is done.
-Original Message-
From: Renee Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 10, 2003 9:40 AM
To:
The vendor of the DVD-RAM drive normally provides the software to write to
the DVD.
-Original Message-
From: Renee Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Backsets To Removable Media
We are testing the feature on TSM that
I'm having a hard time finding a good reference for doing a restore of the
TSM server itself without using DRM. Can anyone point me in the right
direction. I think I have looked through every redbook and white paper out
there.
Thanks in advance.
Yes
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server
5.2.0.0C FIBM Tivoli Storage
Manager
Server Messages, US
English
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial
Thanks Del and Matt for your inputs. It turned out to be a password
problem that would only be resolved using dsmcutil updatepw.
Larry McNutt
Timken Company
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:05 PM
To:
Did you try manual backup of just the system object?
When I've seen that happen, it was always something in the backup of system
objects that was hanging it.
Only solution was to upgrade, but we are at 5.1.6.2 and running OK.
-Original Message-
From: Debi Randolph [mailto:[EMAIL
All I can recommend is that you do some TESTING (you can use FTP) as soon as
possible
.
You won't likely be able to achieve the full 100-Mbit/sec throughput, and
will you have the full bandwidth dedicated to you?
And there can be many pieces of hardware (hubs routers gateways, oh my)
beween you
I am backing up my NDS tree on one server but I keep getting the following
errors:
12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1228E Sending of object '.[Root].O=SBHD.OU=ICU3'
failed
12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1304W Active object not found
12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1228E Sending of object
Your right Wanda, it is something with the system object. I did a 'backup
systemobject' and it just sat there after the successful completion of the
backup of the RSM Database. It's been 1 hour and it's still just sitting
there. The active sessions are gone from the query session. The
Bruce,
One of our W2K / NT / NetWare gurus researched this very problem at our
site. For completeness, I have included his entire report to our group on
the problem. The bottom line is that it is a Novell issue. Hope the attached
helps.
Regards,
Jack Coyle
Rex Healthcare
(919) 784-3792
[EMAIL
Hi Debi,
Well I'm glad you at least found the culprit.
You can expand the SYSTEM OBJECT and back up the pieces one at a time to
find which one is really hanging, but I'm not sure that will help you.
You can:
1) try to fix it with a new patch level (This is the first time I've heard
of this
What is the most current TSM AIX 5.2 Backup/Archive client available? Where can I
download it from. My normal download site only has 5.2.0 client code available for
download. I can't believe there is not a newer release than this.
Thank you for your help,
...Monte
This communication is
You can also do a help reg lic and it will list every license
file with a description of what it is.
Michael French
Savvis Communications
IDS01 Santa Clara, CA
(408)450-7812 -- desk
(408)239-9913 -- mobile
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Hmm, the service.boulder.ibm.com seems to be having a problem
right now, but last time I checked the 5.2.0 version for AIX was the
latest available. Typically I get it at
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/
client/v5r2/
We are in the process of
First the facts:
AIX level 4.3.3-11
Client level 4.1.3.0
Server level 4.1.4.0
Here is the problem, when using the AIX BA GUI, I do not have any data in the
rightmost pane of the GUI when I select a directory to backup or restore. IE, no
files show under the directory. If I click the find
In your selection process, are you clicking on the name of the directory and
not the selection box for that directory? When you click on the directory
name, it sometimes takes a while before the GUI populates the right window
with information depending on the amount of files at the top of that
Yes, I was clicking on the directory name, but found the problem, I needed to click on
the tiny gray box to the left of the directory name, and not just the name.
User error.
-Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/10/03 03:41PM
In your selection process, are you clicking on the name of the directory and
Hello All,
We have prospect customer with Microsoft Navision database.
Does anybody know if we can backup these files with regular Backup/Archive Client or
we need some kind of TDP agent.
Another thing is; on service.boulder.ibm.com there is a folder 5.1.8.1 for TSM Windows
server for couple
I'm having a hard time finding a good reference for doing a restore of the
TSM server itself without using DRM. Can anyone point me in the right
direction. I think I have looked through every redbook and white paper out
there.
Thanks in advance.
The Protecting the Server part of the
Hello,
TSM 5.1.7 on AIX 5.1, Library 3494 and 4x 3590 H-drives FC-attached.
We are in the process of taking into production 4 new 3590 H-drives. We were
using E-drives.
Last weekend we set all the tape (1100) to read-only status, and check-in
some new scratches (using collocation). Now we need
Has anyone had any experience with a Exabyte X200 Library? I am trying to
install it on a p660 with AIX 5.1ML4 and TSM 5.2.1.3 . When we try to define
the library path we get an error saying that the device is not in the
correct state to complete the task. All devices show up as available when
you
Newer versions of AIX come with the Linux Toolbox, and on that are the
mkisofs/cdrecord utilities (may be under the cdrtools package...can't
recall). That's what smitty uses to generate mksysb's to DVD-RAM.
That may do what you want.
-Lloyd
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:05:16 -0500
Prather, Wanda
Have those new scratch tapes been labelled?
-Lloyd
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:15:34 +0100
brian welsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote thusly:
Hello,
TSM 5.1.7 on AIX 5.1, Library 3494 and 4x 3590 H-drives FC-attached.
We are in the process of taking into production 4 new 3590 H-drives. We
were using
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To upgrade a Solaris package you have to delete it and then install
the new one. If those files were left in the usual place, they would
be deleted with the uninstall and you'd lose your customisations.
By linking to /usr/bin they are left alone.
Fine, but
...
When we start move data with a tape written on an E-drive, it moves the data
to a scratch volume. So far so good, but when the scratch tape is defined in
an storage pool we see the message anr8359, Media fault detected and status
is changed again to read-only.
...
Brian - I think we need to
Steven,
Make sure that SCopy preserved the *inheritance* security properties.
We've migrated Windows servers in the past using either SCopy or XCopy /O.
On the target server, the files and folders had the correct permissions,
but they were applied rather than inherited. I'm not sure which tool
From: Steven Bridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, it now looks like TSM ( client 5.1.0.1 , server 5.1.6.3 )
is backing up everything in the drive again. With a throughput of
only about 1 GB an hour, it looks like it is going to take several days
to complete.
1GB/hour is manifestly
56 matches
Mail list logo
