Hi All,
A customer has got the following problems with a tsm restore of a
client.
In de gui: data unavailable to server and activity log messages shown
below.
There seem to be no volumes unavailable and the drives are online.
Would increasing the Maximum Mount Points Allowed value help?
What
q mount to see the situation on the library
- Original Message -
From: Klaas Talsma - KTL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:18 AM
Subject: data unavailable to server/insufficient mount points
Hi All,
A customer has got the following problems with
plus
Q DEVC
to check mountlimit
Juraj
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: goran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 01. März 2004 11:24
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: data unavailable to server/insufficient mount points
q mount to see the situation on the library
Zosimo
A very important question you need to answer is:
Are you are running Data Protection for SQL
backups using multiple stripes?
If you are, then you need to keep the data on separate tapes.
That is because during restore, you will also be using
striping and therefore those tapes will be
it might be useful 4 some1 ... here it goes ...
select activity, cast(sum(affected) as integer)as Attempts,
cast(sum(failed) as integer) as Failed, cast((1-(cast(sum(failed) as
decimal(18,3))/sum(affected)))*100 as decimal(8,2)) as % Success from
summary where start_timetimestamp(current_date-8
Is the TSM Windows 5.2.2 server supported on Windows 2K3 ?
When I check in Passport for what I can download, it says:
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V5.2.2 Windows Server, Multiplatform,
Multi-Language
Platform(s)
Windows 95,Windows NT,Windows 98,Windows 2000
I thought it was a little odd that
Hello,
I'm having difficulty getting a drive back on-line. When I perform a q
drive, it says that it's on-line, but the q path show that it's not. My
server is running 5.1.6.2. Any advice or assistance would be greatly
appreciated.
Thank you,
Angelo
Angelo Proen
EDS
248.265.9753
[EMAIL
update path
- Original Message -
From: Proen, Angelo G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:20 PM
Hello,
I'm having difficulty getting a drive back on-line. When I perform a q
drive, it says that it's on-line, but the q path show that it's not. My
As far as I know, under Windows it's just a matter of reporting back the
right errorlevel.
I experienced also a problem with the TDP for Oracle (Rman) reporting.
In both cases I had to set the returned errorlevel (by the script) from 3 to
2 to get the TSM-server report the failed backup.
In a
Greetings, *SM folks.
I'm working on a design for installation of a new set of TSM hardware, and a
set of several servers to run on it. I'm interested in having some other
folks look over what I've planned, and invite tomato-throwing.
Anyone interested?
- Allen S. Rout
- UF TSM type
The command script you run for the TDPExchange needs to complete with the
correct return code. If you are using the sample, this should be the return
code from txpexcc.exe. Some of the TDP sample scripts run this by the start
/b command. This will put the command in the background and return right
What I did was create another report that goes through the activity log
looking for ANE4993E.
Anybody know of any other error messages I need to be looking for?
Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
Thank you, that worked. I'm obviously a novice but improving.
Thanks again,
Angelo
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
goran
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
update path
- Original Message
I just discovered the following in the Administrator's Reference for
the 5.2.2 level of the Linux TSM server, as part of the documentation
for the 'register license' command:
drm.lic
License for Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition (this includes
server-to-server virtual volumes for database
Also, if you've swapped out the drive with a different one, make sure that
the serial number is updated. TSM will not let you use a drive/path with an
altered serial number for security reasons until you change that to reflect
the new drive.
(went through a three-drive-swap recently...)
- Mike
Thomas, I have implemented a TSM for Linux DRM environment - it is full
function as of December (5.2.2.0, 5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2).
Someone in pubs should update the Admin Ref as both the 5.2 original book
(anrlrf51.pdf) and the current 5.2.2.x book (anrlrf522.pdf) contain the
same text.
Joerg Pohlmann
Dear Del,
I'm using single stripe (STRIPes 1) for TDP for SQL.
Regards,
Zosi
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP for SQL Collocation
Zosimo
A
My client has an existing TSM setup that is quite different from the
textbook examples ;
They are running TSM v5.1.5.4 on Windows 2000, and also have DRM.
Currently, they are keeping seven (7) versions for 150 days, and the
backups are going to a 6TB array. That's right -- currently, there is
Weird requirement.
Not something that I'd recommend. And I don't see the logic for having only part of
the data, but, its an intellectual challenge as to how this can be done.
Try this
Set up a random diskpool big enough to hold one nights backup. Point backup at this.
Set up a main
Hi
Have you looked at the option of generate backupset and also look at the option of
define backupset
It may help you with your requirement.
Thks
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Michael D Schleif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
