Expiration

2004-05-01 Thread Kamp, Bruce
Envirnoment: TSM 5.2.1.2 64bit on AIX 5.1 I am having a problem with expiration taking all night to complete! Has anybody seen this? Any suggestions? 04/30/04 22:24:52 ANR0984I Process 302 for EXPIRE INVENTORY started in the FOREGROUND at 22:24:52. 05/01/04 04:46:21 ANR0812I Inventory file

Re: Expiration

2004-05-01 Thread goran
hi, i think this is normal for this number of objects ... - Original Message - From: Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 2:46 PM Subject: Expiration Envirnoment: TSM 5.2.1.2 64bit on AIX 5.1 I am having a problem with expiration taking

linux raw volumes

2004-05-01 Thread Otto Schakenbos
I'm trying to create raw volumes under linux I have a 1700 GB disk called /dev/sdc i tried: raw /dev/raw/raw1 /dev/sdc when trying to add the volume in tsm i get this. ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: DEFINE VOLUME PMPOOL01 /dev/raw/raw1 ACCESS=READWRITE

Re: Expiration

2004-05-01 Thread David Longo
Was this taking less time and just started taking longer? Does sound like a long time for this amount of objects, unless there was a lot of activity going on at the same time, backups etc. Do a q db f=d and look at the Cache Hit Pct, should be aroung 98-99 percent. If not then do a reset

Re: linux raw volumes

2004-05-01 Thread Richard Sims
I'm trying to create raw volumes under linux I have a 1700 GB disk called /dev/sdc i tried: raw /dev/raw/raw1 /dev/sdc when trying to add the volume in tsm i get this. ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: DEFINE VOLUME PMPOOL01 /dev/raw/raw1 ACCESS=READWRITE

AW: Disk and Tape access over the same fibre adapter

2004-05-01 Thread Franco Chiellino
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Bill Boyer Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. April 2004 13:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Disk and Tape access over the same fibre adapter Just got a new client that wants to do some LANfree backups, but they don't believe me

Re: Using subfile backup for specific filetypes ?

2004-05-01 Thread Chang, Calvin
Does it hold true that once you turned subfilebackup=yes in your dsm.opt all backups from then on will use subfile? It seems to be the case because when I backed up my 400 MB .pst file without adding an include.subfile statement in my dsm.opt it went head and backed it up using subfile backup by

Re: Using subfile backup for specific filetypes ?

2004-05-01 Thread TSM_User
The q inclexcl does list the all includes and excludes in top down fasion. I wouldn't say that it processes it in that order. This command is simply a list. The client optionset and dsm.opt files are the things that are processed and they are processed from the bottom up. Of course all the

Re: Using subfile backup for specific filetypes ?

2004-05-01 Thread TSM_User
From the TSM Admin Reference: Set Subfile Client: Use this command to set up the server to allow clients to back up subfiles. On the client's machine, the SUBFILEBACKUP, SUBFILECACHEPATH, and SUBFILECACHESIZE options must be specified in the client's options file (dsm.opt). It would seem that

Re: Using subfile backup for specific filetypes ?

2004-05-01 Thread Chang, Calvin
That's what I thought, but does it mean that all files being backed up will use the subfile backup? I just need one file to be backed up which is my .pst files. -Original Message- From: TSM_User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using subfile backup for specific filetypes ?

2004-05-01 Thread TSM_User
Yes by default all files are subfile backed up. Use include.subfile and exclude.subfile. From the TSM Client manual: After Tivoli Storage Manager evaluates exclude.dir and any other include-exclude options controlling backup, archive, image, and system objects processing, it uses the

Re: Read block size discrepancy between LV image and B/A client backups

2004-05-01 Thread Paul Ripke
On Friday, Apr 30, 2004, at 05:33 Australia/Sydney, Ted Byrne wrote: AIX client v. 5.1.5.5 AIX server v. 5.1.8.0 AIX version 5.2.0.0 We have a customer who is experiencing discrepancies in performance between large-file cold backups of Oracle data and LV image backups, both sent over the SAN to

Re: linux raw volumes

2004-05-01 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Otto Schakenbos I'm trying to create raw volumes under linux I have a 1700 GB disk called /dev/sdc i tried: raw /dev/raw/raw1 /dev/sdc when trying to add the volume in tsm i get this. ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command:

Re: Read block size discrepancy between LV image and B/A client backups

2004-05-01 Thread Orville Lantto
Take a look at the vmtune parameters for read-ahead. (-r and -R). These can have a very large influence of file level throughput. They can be changed on the fly. Watch with topas as you change them to see how far to go. The defaults are very low. I have improved even old, slow SSA by factors

Re: Select Commands

2004-05-01 Thread Hector Chan
Try this *** summary of the transferred bytes per day per node SELECT ENTITY AS Node/Event, ACTIVITY as Activity, - BYTES AS Bytes Transferred, START_TIME AS Start Time, - END_TIME AS End Time, IDLE AS Idle(Seconds), - MEDIAW AS Media Wait(Seconds), PROCESSES AS Processes, - AFFECTED AS Files